Cite
Koolen KH, Mol KA, Rahel BM, et al. Off-site primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a new centre is safe: comparing clinical outcomes with a hospital with surgical backup. Neth Heart J. 2016;24(10):581-8doi: 10.1007/s12471-016-0872-0.
Koolen, K. H., Mol, K. A., Rahel, B. M., Eerens, F., Aydin, S., Troquay, R. P., Janssen, L., Tonino, W. A., & Meeder, J. G. (2016). Off-site primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a new centre is safe: comparing clinical outcomes with a hospital with surgical backup. Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 24(10), 581-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-016-0872-0
Koolen, K H A J, et al. "Off-site primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a new centre is safe: comparing clinical outcomes with a hospital with surgical backup." Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation vol. 24,10 (2016): 581-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-016-0872-0
Koolen KH, Mol KA, Rahel BM, Eerens F, Aydin S, Troquay RP, Janssen L, Tonino WA, Meeder JG. Off-site primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a new centre is safe: comparing clinical outcomes with a hospital with surgical backup. Neth Heart J. 2016 Oct;24(10):581-8. doi: 10.1007/s12471-016-0872-0. PMID: 27595816; PMCID: PMC5039129.
Copy
Download .nbib