Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 1081 to 1083 of 1083 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
QUADAS-C: A Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.

Annals of internal medicine

Yang B, Mallett S, Takwoingi Y, Davenport CF, Hyde CJ, Whiting PF, Deeks JJ, Leeflang MMG.
PMID: 34698503
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Nov;174(11):1592-1599. doi: 10.7326/M21-2234. Epub 2021 Oct 26.

Comparative diagnostic test accuracy studies assess and compare the accuracy of 2 or more tests in the same study. Although these studies have the potential to yield reliable evidence regarding comparative accuracy, shortcomings in the design, conduct, and analysis...

Top 10 list. AHRQ identifies safety practices for better care.

Modern healthcare

McKinney M.
PMID: 23593896
Mod Healthc. 2013 Mar 11;43(10):12.

No abstract available.

Introducing GRADE across the NICE clinical guideline program.

Journal of clinical epidemiology

Thornton J, Alderson P, Tan T, Turner C, Latchem S, Shaw E, Ruiz F, Reken S, Mugglestone MA, Hill J, Neilson J, Westby M, Francis K, Whittington C, Siddiqui F, Sharma T, Kelly V, Ayiku L, Chamberlain K.
PMID: 22406196
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;66(2):124-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Mar 08.

OBJECTIVES: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) is a system for rating the confidence in estimates of effect and grading guideline recommendations. It promotes evaluation of the quality of the evidence for each outcome and an assessment...

Showing 1081 to 1083 of 1083 entries