Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 37 to 38 of 38 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
Core Outcomes and Common Data Elements in Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature Focusing on Reported Outcomes.

Journal of neurotrauma

Chari A, Hocking KC, Broughton E, Turner C, Santarius T, Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG.
PMID: 26295586
J Neurotrauma. 2016 Jul 01;33(13):1212-9. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.3983. Epub 2015 Nov 06.

The plethora of studies in chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has not resulted in the development of an evidence-based treatment strategy, largely due to heterogeneous outcome measures that preclude cross-study comparisons and guideline development. This study aimed to identify and...

Cite
Chari A, Hocking KC, Broughton E, et al. Core Outcomes and Common Data Elements in Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature Focusing on Reported Outcomes. J Neurotrauma. 2015;33(13):1212-9doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.3983.
Chari, A., Hocking, K. C., Broughton, E., Turner, C., Santarius, T., Hutchinson, P. J., & Kolias, A. G. (2016). Core Outcomes and Common Data Elements in Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature Focusing on Reported Outcomes. Journal of neurotrauma, 33(13), 1212-9. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2015.3983
Chari, Aswin, et al. "Core Outcomes and Common Data Elements in Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature Focusing on Reported Outcomes." Journal of neurotrauma vol. 33,13 (2016): 1212-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2015.3983
Chari A, Hocking KC, Broughton E, Turner C, Santarius T, Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG. Core Outcomes and Common Data Elements in Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature Focusing on Reported Outcomes. J Neurotrauma. 2016 Jul 01;33(13):1212-9. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.3983. Epub 2015 Nov 06. PMID: 26295586; PMCID: PMC4931358.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Inclusion of Effect Size Measures and Clinical Relevance in Research Papers.

Nursing research

Davis SL, Johnson AH, Lynch T, Gray L, Pryor ER, Azuero A, Soistmann HC, Phillips SR, Rice M.
PMID: 33323832
Nurs Res. 2021 May-Jun 01;70(3):222-230. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000494.

BACKGROUND: There are multiple issues that arise when researchers focus on and only report "statistical significance" of study findings. An important element that is often not included in reports is a discussion of clinical relevance.OBJECTIVES: The authors address issues...

Cite
Davis SL, Johnson AH, Lynch T, et al. Inclusion of Effect Size Measures and Clinical Relevance in Research Papers. Nurs Res. 2021;70(3):222-230doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000494.
Davis, S. L., Johnson, A. H., Lynch, T., Gray, L., Pryor, E. R., Azuero, A., Soistmann, H. C., Phillips, S. R., & Rice, M. (2021). Inclusion of Effect Size Measures and Clinical Relevance in Research Papers. Nursing research, 70(3), 222-230. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000494
Davis, Sara L, et al. "Inclusion of Effect Size Measures and Clinical Relevance in Research Papers." Nursing research vol. 70,3 (2021): 222-230. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000494
Davis SL, Johnson AH, Lynch T, Gray L, Pryor ER, Azuero A, Soistmann HC, Phillips SR, Rice M. Inclusion of Effect Size Measures and Clinical Relevance in Research Papers. Nurs Res. 2021 May-Jun 01;70(3):222-230. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000494. PMID: 33323832.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Showing 37 to 38 of 38 entries