Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 301 to 309 of 309 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
How to compare cross-lagged associations in a multilevel autoregressive model.

Psychological methods

Schuurman NK, Ferrer E, de Boer-Sonnenschein M, Hamaker EL.
PMID: 27045851
Psychol Methods. 2016 Jun;21(2):206-21. doi: 10.1037/met0000062. Epub 2016 Jan 25.

By modeling variables over time it is possible to investigate the Granger-causal cross-lagged associations between variables. By comparing the standardized cross-lagged coefficients, the relative strength of these associations can be evaluated in order to determine important driving forces in...

Cite
Schuurman NK, Ferrer E, de Boer-Sonnenschein M, et al. How to compare cross-lagged associations in a multilevel autoregressive model. Psychol Methods. 2016;21(2):206-21doi: 10.1037/met0000062.
Schuurman, N. K., Ferrer, E., de Boer-Sonnenschein, M., & Hamaker, E. L. (2016). How to compare cross-lagged associations in a multilevel autoregressive model. Psychological methods, 21(2), 206-21. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000062
Schuurman, Noémi K, et al. "How to compare cross-lagged associations in a multilevel autoregressive model." Psychological methods vol. 21,2 (2016): 206-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000062
Schuurman NK, Ferrer E, de Boer-Sonnenschein M, Hamaker EL. How to compare cross-lagged associations in a multilevel autoregressive model. Psychol Methods. 2016 Jun;21(2):206-21. doi: 10.1037/met0000062. Epub 2016 Jan 25. PMID: 27045851.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Societal, Individual, and Illness Uncertainty.

Issues in mental health nursing

Flaskerud JH.
PMID: 26514262
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2015;36(10):831-5. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2015.1022845.

No abstract available.

Cite
Flaskerud JH. Societal, Individual, and Illness Uncertainty. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2015;36(10):831-5doi: 10.3109/01612840.2015.1022845.
Flaskerud, J. H. (2015). Societal, Individual, and Illness Uncertainty. Issues in mental health nursing, 36(10), 831-5. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2015.1022845
Flaskerud, Jacquelyn H. "Societal, Individual, and Illness Uncertainty." Issues in mental health nursing vol. 36,10 (2015): 831-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2015.1022845
Flaskerud JH. Societal, Individual, and Illness Uncertainty. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2015;36(10):831-5. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2015.1022845. PMID: 26514262.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
You ≠ me: individual differences in the structure of social cognition.

Psychological research

Shaw DJ, Czekóová K, Pennington CR, Qureshi AW, Špiláková B, Salazar M, Brázdil M, Urbánek T.
PMID: 30324265
Psychol Res. 2020 Jun;84(4):1139-1156. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1107-3. Epub 2018 Oct 15.

This study investigated the structure of social cognition, and how it is influenced by personality; specifically, how various socio-cognitive capabilities, and the pattern of inter-relationships and co-dependencies among them differ between divergent personality styles. To measure social cognition, a...

Cite
Shaw DJ, Czekóová K, Pennington CR, et al. You ≠ me: individual differences in the structure of social cognition. Psychol Res. 2018;84(4):1139-1156doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1107-3.
Shaw, D. J., Czekóová, K., Pennington, C. R., Qureshi, A. W., Špiláková, B., Salazar, M., Brázdil, M., & Urbánek, T. (2020). You ≠ me: individual differences in the structure of social cognition. Psychological research, 84(4), 1139-1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1107-3
Shaw, D J, et al. "You ≠ me: individual differences in the structure of social cognition." Psychological research vol. 84,4 (2020): 1139-1156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1107-3
Shaw DJ, Czekóová K, Pennington CR, Qureshi AW, Špiláková B, Salazar M, Brázdil M, Urbánek T. You ≠ me: individual differences in the structure of social cognition. Psychol Res. 2020 Jun;84(4):1139-1156. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1107-3. Epub 2018 Oct 15. PMID: 30324265; PMCID: PMC7239802.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
The Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity (PATH) Statement: Explanation and Elaboration.

Annals of internal medicine

Kent DM, van Klaveren D, Paulus JK, D'Agostino R, Goodman S, Hayward R, Ioannidis JPA, Patrick-Lake B, Morton S, Pencina M, Raman G, Ross JS, Selker HP, Varadhan R, Vickers A, Wong JB, Steyerberg EW.
PMID: 31711094
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 07;172(1):W1-W25. doi: 10.7326/M18-3668. Epub 2019 Nov 12.

The PATH (Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity) Statement was developed to promote the conduct of, and provide guidance for, predictive analyses of heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTE) in clinical trials. The goal of predictive HTE analysis is to...

Cite
Kent DM, van Klaveren D, Paulus JK, et al. The Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity (PATH) Statement: Explanation and Elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2019;172(1):W1-W25doi: 10.7326/M18-3668.
Kent, D. M., van Klaveren, D., Paulus, J. K., D'Agostino, R., Goodman, S., Hayward, R., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Patrick-Lake, B., Morton, S., Pencina, M., Raman, G., Ross, J. S., Selker, H. P., Varadhan, R., Vickers, A., Wong, J. B., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2020). The Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity (PATH) Statement: Explanation and Elaboration. Annals of internal medicine, 172(1), W1-W25. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-3668
Kent, David M, et al. "The Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity (PATH) Statement: Explanation and Elaboration." Annals of internal medicine vol. 172,1 (2020): W1-W25. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-3668
Kent DM, van Klaveren D, Paulus JK, D'Agostino R, Goodman S, Hayward R, Ioannidis JPA, Patrick-Lake B, Morton S, Pencina M, Raman G, Ross JS, Selker HP, Varadhan R, Vickers A, Wong JB, Steyerberg EW. The Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity (PATH) Statement: Explanation and Elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 07;172(1):W1-W25. doi: 10.7326/M18-3668. Epub 2019 Nov 12. PMID: 31711094; PMCID: PMC7750907.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Enhancing the collectivist critique: accounts of the human enhancement debate.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy

Johnson T.
PMID: 34132941
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Dec;24(4):721-730. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10030-7. Epub 2021 Jun 16.

Individualist ethical analyses in the enhancement debate have often prioritised or only considered the interests and concerns of parents and the future child. The collectivist critique of the human enhancement debate argues that rather than pure individualism, a focus...

Cite
Johnson T. Enhancing the collectivist critique: accounts of the human enhancement debate. Med Health Care Philos. 2021;24(4):721-730doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10030-7.
Johnson, T. (2021). Enhancing the collectivist critique: accounts of the human enhancement debate. Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 24(4), 721-730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10030-7
Johnson, Tess. "Enhancing the collectivist critique: accounts of the human enhancement debate." Medicine, health care, and philosophy vol. 24,4 (2021): 721-730. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10030-7
Johnson T. Enhancing the collectivist critique: accounts of the human enhancement debate. Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Dec;24(4):721-730. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10030-7. Epub 2021 Jun 16. PMID: 34132941; PMCID: PMC8557146.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Task Enjoyment as an Individual Difference Construct.

Journal of personality assessment

Czikmantori T, Hennecke M, Brandstätter V.
PMID: 33656404
J Pers Assess. 2021 Nov-Dec;103(6):818-832. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1882473. Epub 2021 Mar 03.

Are there individual differences in the tendency to enjoy tasks regardless of the tasks' contents or situational determinants? To answer this question, we constructed and validated the six-item Trait Task Enjoyment Scale (TTES). In Study 1, it had an...

Cite
Czikmantori T, Hennecke M, Brandstätter V. Task Enjoyment as an Individual Difference Construct. J Pers Assess. 2021;103(6):818-832doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1882473.
Czikmantori, T., Hennecke, M., & Brandstätter, V. (2021). Task Enjoyment as an Individual Difference Construct. Journal of personality assessment, 103(6), 818-832. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.1882473
Czikmantori, Thomas, et al. "Task Enjoyment as an Individual Difference Construct." Journal of personality assessment vol. 103,6 (2021): 818-832. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.1882473
Czikmantori T, Hennecke M, Brandstätter V. Task Enjoyment as an Individual Difference Construct. J Pers Assess. 2021 Nov-Dec;103(6):818-832. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1882473. Epub 2021 Mar 03. PMID: 33656404.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Leveraging individual differences to understand grounded procedures.

The Behavioral and brain sciences

Fetterman AK, Robinson MD, Meier BP.
PMID: 33599575
Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Feb 18;44:e6. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X20000382.

We applaud the goals and execution of the target article, but note that individual differences do not receive much attention. This is a shortcoming because individual differences can play a vital role in theory testing. In our commentary, we...

Cite
Fetterman AK, Robinson MD, Meier BP. Leveraging individual differences to understand grounded procedures. Behav Brain Sci. 2021;44:e6doi: 10.1017/S0140525X20000382.
Fetterman, A. K., Robinson, M. D., & Meier, B. P. (2021). Leveraging individual differences to understand grounded procedures. The Behavioral and brain sciences, 44e6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20000382
Fetterman, Adam K, et al. "Leveraging individual differences to understand grounded procedures." The Behavioral and brain sciences vol. 44 (2021): e6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20000382
Fetterman AK, Robinson MD, Meier BP. Leveraging individual differences to understand grounded procedures. Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Feb 18;44:e6. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X20000382. PMID: 33599575.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Measurement of individual differences in face-identity processing abilities in older adults.

Cognitive research: principles and implications

Boutet I, Meinhardt-Injac B.
PMID: 34275050
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Jul 18;6(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00310-4.

BACKGROUND: Face-identity processing declines with age. Few studies have examined whether face-identity processing abilities can be measured independently from general cognitive abilities in older adults (OA). This question has practical implications for the assessment of face-identity processing abilities in...

Cite
Boutet I, Meinhardt-Injac B. Measurement of individual differences in face-identity processing abilities in older adults. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021;6(1):48doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00310-4.
Boutet, I., & Meinhardt-Injac, B. (2021). Measurement of individual differences in face-identity processing abilities in older adults. Cognitive research: principles and implications, 6(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00310-4
Boutet, Isabelle, and Meinhardt-Injac, Bozana. "Measurement of individual differences in face-identity processing abilities in older adults." Cognitive research: principles and implications vol. 6,1 (2021): 48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00310-4
Boutet I, Meinhardt-Injac B. Measurement of individual differences in face-identity processing abilities in older adults. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Jul 18;6(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00310-4. PMID: 34275050; PMCID: PMC8286909.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Individual differences in emotion regulation prospectively predict early COVID-19 related acute stress.

Journal of anxiety disorders

Tyra AT, Griffin SM, Fergus TA, Ginty AT.
PMID: 33962141
J Anxiety Disord. 2021 Jun;81:102411. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102411. Epub 2021 May 01.

Preliminary prospective research suggests emotion dysregulation may confer vulnerability to poor stress responses. The present prospective study extends this research by examining both specific emotion regulation strategies and global emotion regulation difficulties in the context of acute stress following...

Cite
Tyra AT, Griffin SM, Fergus TA, et al. Individual differences in emotion regulation prospectively predict early COVID-19 related acute stress. J Anxiety Disord. 2021;81:102411doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102411.
Tyra, A. T., Griffin, S. M., Fergus, T. A., & Ginty, A. T. (2021). Individual differences in emotion regulation prospectively predict early COVID-19 related acute stress. Journal of anxiety disorders, 81102411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102411
Tyra, Alexandra T, et al. "Individual differences in emotion regulation prospectively predict early COVID-19 related acute stress." Journal of anxiety disorders vol. 81 (2021): 102411. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102411
Tyra AT, Griffin SM, Fergus TA, Ginty AT. Individual differences in emotion regulation prospectively predict early COVID-19 related acute stress. J Anxiety Disord. 2021 Jun;81:102411. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102411. Epub 2021 May 01. PMID: 33962141.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Showing 301 to 309 of 309 entries