Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 25 to 36 of 1645 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
Reliability of Mini-CEX Assessment of Medical Students in General Practice Clinical Attachments.

Family medicine

Eggleton K, Goodyear-Smith F, Paton L, Falloon K, Wong C, Lack L, Kennelly J, Fishman T, Moyes SA.
PMID: 27655195
Fam Med. 2016 Sep;48(8):624-30.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mini Clinical Evaluation eXercise (mini-CEX) involves observation of routine clinical encounters, initially developed to assess clinical competencies of postgraduate doctors. This study aimed to measure its inter-rater reliability in assessment of medical students in general practice...

Cite
Eggleton K, Goodyear-Smith F, Paton L, et al. Reliability of Mini-CEX Assessment of Medical Students in General Practice Clinical Attachments. Fam Med. 2016;48(8):624-30
Eggleton, K., Goodyear-Smith, F., Paton, L., Falloon, K., Wong, C., Lack, L., Kennelly, J., Fishman, T., & Moyes, S. A. (2016). Reliability of Mini-CEX Assessment of Medical Students in General Practice Clinical Attachments. Family medicine, 48(8), 624-30.
Eggleton, Kyle, et al. "Reliability of Mini-CEX Assessment of Medical Students in General Practice Clinical Attachments." Family medicine vol. 48,8 (2016): 624-30.
Eggleton K, Goodyear-Smith F, Paton L, Falloon K, Wong C, Lack L, Kennelly J, Fishman T, Moyes SA. Reliability of Mini-CEX Assessment of Medical Students in General Practice Clinical Attachments. Fam Med. 2016 Sep;48(8):624-30. PMID: 27655195.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Evolutions in clinical reasoning assessment: The Evolving Script Concordance Test.

Medical teacher

Cooke S, Lemay JF, Beran T.
PMID: 28580814
Med Teach. 2017 Aug;39(8):828-835. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1327706. Epub 2017 Jun 05.

INTRODUCTION: Script concordance testing (SCT) is a method of assessment of clinical reasoning. We developed a new type of SCT case design, the evolving SCT (E-SCT), whereby the patient's clinical story is "evolving" and with thoughtful integration of new...

Cite
Cooke S, Lemay JF, Beran T. Evolutions in clinical reasoning assessment: The Evolving Script Concordance Test. Med Teach. 2017;39(8):828-835doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1327706.
Cooke, S., Lemay, J. F., & Beran, T. (2017). Evolutions in clinical reasoning assessment: The Evolving Script Concordance Test. Medical teacher, 39(8), 828-835. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1327706
Cooke, Suzette, et al. "Evolutions in clinical reasoning assessment: The Evolving Script Concordance Test." Medical teacher vol. 39,8 (2017): 828-835. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1327706
Cooke S, Lemay JF, Beran T. Evolutions in clinical reasoning assessment: The Evolving Script Concordance Test. Med Teach. 2017 Aug;39(8):828-835. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1327706. Epub 2017 Jun 05. PMID: 28580814.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Undergraduate nursing students at risk of failure.

Nurse education today

Cascoe K, Stanley S, Stennett R, Allen C.
PMID: 28040310
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 May;52:121-122. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.021. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

No abstract available.

Cite
Cascoe K, Stanley S, Stennett R, et al. Undergraduate nursing students at risk of failure. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;52:121-122doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.021.
Cascoe, K., Stanley, S., Stennett, R., & Allen, C. (2017). Undergraduate nursing students at risk of failure. Nurse education today, 52121-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.021
Cascoe, Karozan, et al. "Undergraduate nursing students at risk of failure." Nurse education today vol. 52 (2017): 121-122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.021
Cascoe K, Stanley S, Stennett R, Allen C. Undergraduate nursing students at risk of failure. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 May;52:121-122. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.021. Epub 2016 Dec 22. PMID: 28040310.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
How was the intern year?: self and clinical assessment of four cohorts, from two medical curricula.

BMC medical education

Laven G, Keefe D, Duggan P, Tonkin A.
PMID: 24961171
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jun 24;14:123. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-123.

BACKGROUND: Problem-based curricula have provoked controversy amongst educators and students regarding outcome in medical graduates, supporting the need for longitudinal evaluation of curriculum change. As part of a longitudinal evaluation program at the University of Adelaide, a mixed method...

Cite
Laven G, Keefe D, Duggan P, et al. How was the intern year?: self and clinical assessment of four cohorts, from two medical curricula. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:123doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-123.
Laven, G., Keefe, D., Duggan, P., & Tonkin, A. (2014). How was the intern year?: self and clinical assessment of four cohorts, from two medical curricula. BMC medical education, 14123. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-123
Laven, Gillian, et al. "How was the intern year?: self and clinical assessment of four cohorts, from two medical curricula." BMC medical education vol. 14 (2014): 123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-123
Laven G, Keefe D, Duggan P, Tonkin A. How was the intern year?: self and clinical assessment of four cohorts, from two medical curricula. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jun 24;14:123. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-123. PMID: 24961171; PMCID: PMC4081487.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
[Will I be a good doctor?].

Harefuah

Shoenfeld Y, Keren G.
PMID: 22991871
Harefuah. 2012 Jun;151(6):372-3.

No abstract available.

Cite
Shoenfeld Y, Keren G. [Will I be a good doctor?]. Harefuah. 2012;151(6):372-3
Shoenfeld, Y., & Keren, G. (2012). [Will I be a good doctor?]. Harefuah, 151(6), 372-3.
Shoenfeld, Y, and Keren, G. "[Will I be a good doctor?]." Harefuah vol. 151,6 (2012): 372-3.
Shoenfeld Y, Keren G. [Will I be a good doctor?]. Harefuah. 2012 Jun;151(6):372-3. Hebrew. PMID: 22991871.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Nursing and Midwifery Council revalidation.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)

Myatt R.
PMID: 26463811
Nurs Stand. 2015 Oct 14;30(7):52-9. doi: 10.7748/ns.30.7.52.s48.

All UK nurses and midwives will be required to perform revalidation as part of their registration process, from April 2016. This entails a pre-determined number of practice hours and study time, reflection on practice, obtaining feedback on individual performance...

Cite
Myatt R. Nursing and Midwifery Council revalidation. Nurs Stand. 2015;30(7):52-9doi: 10.7748/ns.30.7.52.s48.
Myatt, R. (2015). Nursing and Midwifery Council revalidation. Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987), 30(7), 52-9. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.30.7.52.s48
Myatt, Rebecca. "Nursing and Midwifery Council revalidation." Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987) vol. 30,7 (2015): 52-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.30.7.52.s48
Myatt R. Nursing and Midwifery Council revalidation. Nurs Stand. 2015 Oct 14;30(7):52-9. doi: 10.7748/ns.30.7.52.s48. PMID: 26463811.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Criterion validity of a competency-based assessment center in medical education--a 4-year follow-up study.

Medical education online

Rotthoff T, Ostapczuk MS, Kröncke KD, Zimmerhofer A, Decking U, Schneider M, Ritz-Timme S.
PMID: 25219931
Med Educ Online. 2014 Sep 12;19:25254. doi: 10.3402/meo.v19.25254. eCollection 2014.

INTRODUCTION: Core competencies have progressively gained importance in medical education. In other contexts, especially personnel selection and development, assessment centers (ACs) are used to assess competencies, but there is only a limited number of studies on competency-based ACs in...

Cite
Rotthoff T, Ostapczuk MS, Kröncke KD, et al. Criterion validity of a competency-based assessment center in medical education--a 4-year follow-up study. Med Educ Online. 2014;19:25254doi: 10.3402/meo.v19.25254.
Rotthoff, T., Ostapczuk, M. S., Kröncke, K. D., Zimmerhofer, A., Decking, U., Schneider, M., & Ritz-Timme, S. (2014). Criterion validity of a competency-based assessment center in medical education--a 4-year follow-up study. Medical education online, 1925254. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v19.25254
Rotthoff, Thomas, et al. "Criterion validity of a competency-based assessment center in medical education--a 4-year follow-up study." Medical education online vol. 19 (2014): 25254. doi: https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v19.25254
Rotthoff T, Ostapczuk MS, Kröncke KD, Zimmerhofer A, Decking U, Schneider M, Ritz-Timme S. Criterion validity of a competency-based assessment center in medical education--a 4-year follow-up study. Med Educ Online. 2014 Sep 12;19:25254. doi: 10.3402/meo.v19.25254. eCollection 2014. PMID: 25219931; PMCID: PMC4163580.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training.

The British journal of surgery

Graafland M, Schraagen JM, Schijven MP.
PMID: 22961509
Br J Surg. 2012 Oct;99(10):1322-30. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8819.

BACKGROUND: The application of digital games for training medical professionals is on the rise. So-called 'serious' games form training tools that provide a challenging simulated environment, ideal for future surgical training. Ultimately, serious games are directed at reducing medical...

Cite
Graafland M, Schraagen JM, Schijven MP. Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training. Br J Surg. 2012;99(10):1322-30doi: 10.1002/bjs.8819.
Graafland, M., Schraagen, J. M., & Schijven, M. P. (2012). Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training. The British journal of surgery, 99(10), 1322-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8819
Graafland, M, et al. "Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training." The British journal of surgery vol. 99,10 (2012): 1322-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8819
Graafland M, Schraagen JM, Schijven MP. Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training. Br J Surg. 2012 Oct;99(10):1322-30. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8819. PMID: 22961509.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Reply to letter: "General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship".

Annals of surgery

Mattar SG, Minter RM.
PMID: 24374522
Ann Surg. 2015 Jan;261(1):e6-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000477.

No abstract available.

Cite
Mattar SG, Minter RM. Reply to letter: "General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship". Ann Surg. 2015;261(1):e6-7doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000477.
Mattar, S. G., & Minter, R. M. (2015). Reply to letter: "General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship". Annals of surgery, 261(1), e6-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000477
Mattar, Samer G, and Minter, Rebecca M. "Reply to letter: "General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship"." Annals of surgery vol. 261,1 (2015): e6-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000477
Mattar SG, Minter RM. Reply to letter: "General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship". Ann Surg. 2015 Jan;261(1):e6-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000477. PMID: 24374522.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Frailty related aspects of care are under-recognised in UK medical curriculums.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

Knight PV, Oliver D, Wyrko Z, Gordon AL, Turner G.
PMID: 24871310
BMJ. 2014 May 28;348:g3325. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3325.

No abstract available.

Cite
Knight PV, Oliver D, Wyrko Z, et al. Frailty related aspects of care are under-recognised in UK medical curriculums. BMJ. 2014;348:g3325doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3325.
Knight, P. V., Oliver, D., Wyrko, Z., Gordon, A. L., & Turner, G. (2014). Frailty related aspects of care are under-recognised in UK medical curriculums. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 348g3325. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3325
Knight, Paul V, et al. "Frailty related aspects of care are under-recognised in UK medical curriculums." BMJ (Clinical research ed.) vol. 348 (2014): g3325. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3325
Knight PV, Oliver D, Wyrko Z, Gordon AL, Turner G. Frailty related aspects of care are under-recognised in UK medical curriculums. BMJ. 2014 May 28;348:g3325. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3325. PMID: 24871310.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
CSA pass rates.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

Martin W.
PMID: 24351474
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Dec;63(617):631. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X675331.

No abstract available.

Cite
Martin W. CSA pass rates. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63(617):631doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X675331.
Martin, W. (2013). CSA pass rates. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 63(617), 631. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X675331
Martin, Wesley. "CSA pass rates." The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners vol. 63,617 (2013): 631. doi: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X675331
Martin W. CSA pass rates. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Dec;63(617):631. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X675331. PMID: 24351474; PMCID: PMC3839365.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Guidelines for clinical supervision in health service psychology.

The American psychologist

[No authors listed]
PMID: 25581007
Am Psychol. 2015 Jan;70(1):33-46. doi: 10.1037/a0038112.

This document outlines guidelines for supervision of students in health service psychology education and training programs. The goal was to capture optimal performance expectations for psychologists who supervise. It is based on the premises that supervisors (a) strive to...

Cite
Guidelines for clinical supervision in health service psychology. Am Psychol. 2015;70(1):33-46doi: 10.1037/a0038112.
(2015). Guidelines for clinical supervision in health service psychology. The American psychologist, 70(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038112
"Guidelines for clinical supervision in health service psychology." The American psychologist vol. 70,1 (2015): 33-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038112
Guidelines for clinical supervision in health service psychology. Am Psychol. 2015 Jan;70(1):33-46. doi: 10.1037/a0038112. PMID: 25581007.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Showing 25 to 36 of 1645 entries