Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 13 to 24 of 876 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
What is the appropriate control condition for approach bias modification? A response to commentary by Becker et al. (2017).

Addictive behaviors

Kakoschke N, Kemps E, Tiggemann M.
PMID: 28238576
Addict Behav. 2018 Feb;77:295-296. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

No abstract available.

Cite
Kakoschke N, Kemps E, Tiggemann M. What is the appropriate control condition for approach bias modification? A response to commentary by Becker et al. (2017). Addict Behav. 2017;77:295-296doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.02.024.
Kakoschke, N., Kemps, E., & Tiggemann, M. (2018). What is the appropriate control condition for approach bias modification? A response to commentary by Becker et al. (2017). Addictive behaviors, 77295-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.02.024
Kakoschke, Naomi, et al. "What is the appropriate control condition for approach bias modification? A response to commentary by Becker et al. (2017)." Addictive behaviors vol. 77 (2018): 295-296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.02.024
Kakoschke N, Kemps E, Tiggemann M. What is the appropriate control condition for approach bias modification? A response to commentary by Becker et al. (2017). Addict Behav. 2018 Feb;77:295-296. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 Feb 16. PMID: 28238576.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Competing risk bias was common in Kaplan-Meier risk estimates published in prominent medical journals.

Journal of clinical epidemiology

van Walraven C, McAlister FA.
PMID: 26232083
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:170-3.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Jul 29.

OBJECTIVE: Risk estimates from Kaplan-Meier curves are well known to medical researchers, reviewers, and editors. In this study, we determined the proportion of Kaplan-Meier analyses published in prominent medical journals that are potentially biased because of competing events ("competing...

Cite
van Walraven C, McAlister FA. Competing risk bias was common in Kaplan-Meier risk estimates published in prominent medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;69:170-3.e8doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.07.006.
van Walraven, C., & McAlister, F. A. (2016). Competing risk bias was common in Kaplan-Meier risk estimates published in prominent medical journals. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 69170-3.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.07.006
van Walraven, Carl, and McAlister, Finlay A. "Competing risk bias was common in Kaplan-Meier risk estimates published in prominent medical journals." Journal of clinical epidemiology vol. 69 (2016): 170-3.e8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.07.006
van Walraven C, McAlister FA. Competing risk bias was common in Kaplan-Meier risk estimates published in prominent medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:170-3.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Jul 29. PMID: 26232083.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation.

International journal of evidence-based healthcare

Lockwood C, Munn Z, Porritt K.
PMID: 26262565
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):179-87. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062.

Qualitative synthesis informs important aspects of evidence-based healthcare, particularly within the practical decision-making contexts that health professionals work in. Of the qualitative methodologies available for synthesis, meta-aggregation is most transparently aligned with accepted conventions for the conduct of high-quality...

Cite
Lockwood C, Munn Z, Porritt K. Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):179-87doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062.
Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International journal of evidence-based healthcare, 13(3), 179-87. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062
Lockwood, Craig, et al. "Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation." International journal of evidence-based healthcare vol. 13,3 (2015): 179-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062
Lockwood C, Munn Z, Porritt K. Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):179-87. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062. PMID: 26262565.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Bias and variance reduction in estimating the proportion of true-null hypotheses.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)

Cheng Y, Gao D, Tong T.
PMID: 24963010
Biostatistics. 2015 Jan;16(1):189-204. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxu029. Epub 2014 Jun 23.

When testing a large number of hypotheses, estimating the proportion of true nulls, denoted by π(0), becomes increasingly important. This quantity has many applications in practice. For instance, a reliable estimate of π(0) can eliminate the conservative bias of...

Cite
Cheng Y, Gao D, Tong T. Bias and variance reduction in estimating the proportion of true-null hypotheses. Biostatistics. 2014;16(1):189-204doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxu029.
Cheng, Y., Gao, D., & Tong, T. (2015). Bias and variance reduction in estimating the proportion of true-null hypotheses. Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 16(1), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxu029
Cheng, Yebin, et al. "Bias and variance reduction in estimating the proportion of true-null hypotheses." Biostatistics (Oxford, England) vol. 16,1 (2015): 189-204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxu029
Cheng Y, Gao D, Tong T. Bias and variance reduction in estimating the proportion of true-null hypotheses. Biostatistics. 2015 Jan;16(1):189-204. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxu029. Epub 2014 Jun 23. PMID: 24963010; PMCID: PMC4263223.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Thas nowt so blind as 'em that won't see.

Archives of disease in childhood

Phillips B.
PMID: 23757482
Arch Dis Child. 2013 Jul;98(7):558. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304248.

No abstract available.

Cite
Phillips B. Thas nowt so blind as 'em that won't see. Arch Dis Child. 2013;98(7):558doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304248.
Phillips, B. (2013). Thas nowt so blind as 'em that won't see. Archives of disease in childhood, 98(7), 558. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-304248
Phillips, Bob. "Thas nowt so blind as 'em that won't see." Archives of disease in childhood vol. 98,7 (2013): 558. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-304248
Phillips B. Thas nowt so blind as 'em that won't see. Arch Dis Child. 2013 Jul;98(7):558. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304248. PMID: 23757482.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Précis of Social Perception and Social Reality: Why accuracy dominates bias and self-fulfilling prophecy.

The Behavioral and brain sciences

Jussim L.
PMID: 26079679
Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1500062X. Epub 2015 Jun 16.

Social Perception and Social Reality (Jussim 2012) reviews the evidence in social psychology and related fields and reaches three conclusions: (1) Although errors, biases, and self-fulfilling prophecies in person perception are real, reliable, and occasionally quite powerful, on average,...

Cite
Jussim L. Précis of Social Perception and Social Reality: Why accuracy dominates bias and self-fulfilling prophecy. Behav Brain Sci. 2015;40:e1doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1500062X.
Jussim, L. (2017). Précis of Social Perception and Social Reality: Why accuracy dominates bias and self-fulfilling prophecy. The Behavioral and brain sciences, 40e1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1500062X
Jussim, Lee. "Précis of Social Perception and Social Reality: Why accuracy dominates bias and self-fulfilling prophecy." The Behavioral and brain sciences vol. 40 (2017): e1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1500062X
Jussim L. Précis of Social Perception and Social Reality: Why accuracy dominates bias and self-fulfilling prophecy. Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1500062X. Epub 2015 Jun 16. PMID: 26079679.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
[Reply to Letter to the Editor: Comparison of self-concept between groups: bias of differences?].

Revista chilena de pediatria

Castillo C, Santander D, Solís F.
PMID: 27237616
Rev Chil Pediatr. 2016 Sep - Oct;87(5):437. doi: 10.1016/j.rchipe.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 May 26.

No abstract available.

Cite
Castillo C, Santander D, Solís F. Respuesta a Carta al Editor: Comparación del autoconcepto entre grupos, ¿sesgo o diferencias? [Reply to Letter to the Editor: Comparison of self-concept between groups: bias of differences?]. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2016;87(5):437doi: 10.1016/j.rchipe.2016.04.008.
Castillo, C., Santander, D., & Solís, F. (2016). Respuesta a Carta al Editor: Comparación del autoconcepto entre grupos, ¿sesgo o diferencias? [Reply to Letter to the Editor: Comparison of self-concept between groups: bias of differences?]. Revista chilena de pediatria, 87(5), 437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rchipe.2016.04.008
Castillo, Carmen, et al. "Respuesta a Carta al Editor: Comparación del autoconcepto entre grupos, ¿sesgo o diferencias?" [Reply to Letter to the Editor: Comparison of self-concept between groups: bias of differences?]. Revista chilena de pediatria vol. 87,5 (2016): 437. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rchipe.2016.04.008
Castillo C, Santander D, Solís F. Respuesta a Carta al Editor: Comparación del autoconcepto entre grupos, ¿sesgo o diferencias? [Reply to Letter to the Editor: Comparison of self-concept between groups: bias of differences?]. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2016 Sep - Oct;87(5):437. doi: 10.1016/j.rchipe.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 May 26. Spanish. PMID: 27237616.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
SSD modeling-It's all about F!.

Integrated environmental assessment and management

Fox DR.
PMID: 26745359
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2016 Jan;12(1):197-8. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1724.

No abstract available.

Cite
Fox DR. SSD modeling-It's all about F!. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2016;12(1):197-8doi: 10.1002/ieam.1724.
Fox, D. R. (2016). SSD modeling-It's all about F!. Integrated environmental assessment and management, 12(1), 197-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1724
Fox, David R. "SSD modeling-It's all about F!." Integrated environmental assessment and management vol. 12,1 (2016): 197-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1724
Fox DR. SSD modeling-It's all about F!. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2016 Jan;12(1):197-8. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1724. PMID: 26745359.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Change in Medical Student Implicit Bias.

Journal of general internal medicine

Westfall JM.
PMID: 27067346
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jul;31(7):714. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3684-4.

No abstract available.

Cite
Westfall JM. Change in Medical Student Implicit Bias. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(7):714doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3684-4.
Westfall, J. M. (2016). Change in Medical Student Implicit Bias. Journal of general internal medicine, 31(7), 714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3684-4
Westfall, John M. "Change in Medical Student Implicit Bias." Journal of general internal medicine vol. 31,7 (2016): 714. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3684-4
Westfall JM. Change in Medical Student Implicit Bias. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jul;31(7):714. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3684-4. PMID: 27067346; PMCID: PMC4907959.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Sources of bias in single-trial normalization procedures.

The European journal of neuroscience

Ciuparu A, Mureşan RC.
PMID: 26797876
Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Apr;43(7):861-9. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13179. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

Baseline normalization procedures are essential for the analysis of brain activity. These use statistics of a reference (baseline) period to normalize data along the entire trial (baseline and stimulus periods). A very popular procedure is pseudo z-scoring, traditionally applied...

Cite
Ciuparu A, Mureşan RC. Sources of bias in single-trial normalization procedures. Eur J Neurosci. 2016;43(7):861-9doi: 10.1111/ejn.13179.
Ciuparu, A., & Mureşan, R. C. (2016). Sources of bias in single-trial normalization procedures. The European journal of neuroscience, 43(7), 861-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13179
Ciuparu, Andrei, and Mureşan, Raul C. "Sources of bias in single-trial normalization procedures." The European journal of neuroscience vol. 43,7 (2016): 861-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13179
Ciuparu A, Mureşan RC. Sources of bias in single-trial normalization procedures. Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Apr;43(7):861-9. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13179. Epub 2016 Feb 19. PMID: 26797876.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Cross-cultural comparisons of assessment of clinical performance.

Medical education

Patel M, Agius S.
PMID: 28299843
Med Educ. 2017 Apr;51(4):348-350. doi: 10.1111/medu.13262.

No abstract available.

Cite
Patel M, Agius S. Cross-cultural comparisons of assessment of clinical performance. Med Educ. 2017;51(4):348-350doi: 10.1111/medu.13262.
Patel, M., & Agius, S. (2017). Cross-cultural comparisons of assessment of clinical performance. Medical education, 51(4), 348-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13262
Patel, Mumtaz, and Agius, Steven. "Cross-cultural comparisons of assessment of clinical performance." Medical education vol. 51,4 (2017): 348-350. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13262
Patel M, Agius S. Cross-cultural comparisons of assessment of clinical performance. Med Educ. 2017 Apr;51(4):348-350. doi: 10.1111/medu.13262. PMID: 28299843.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Stanovich's arguments against the "adaptive rationality" project: An assessment.

Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences

Polonioli A.
PMID: 25617703
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2015 Feb;49:55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.12.003. Epub 2015 Jan 22.

This paper discusses Stanovich's appeal to individual differences in reasoning and decision-making to undermine the "adaptive rationality" project put forth by Gigerenzer and his co-workers. I discuss two different arguments based on Stanovich's research. First, heterogeneity in the use...

Cite
Polonioli A. Stanovich's arguments against the "adaptive rationality" project: An assessment. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2015;49:55-62doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.12.003.
Polonioli, A. (2015). Stanovich's arguments against the "adaptive rationality" project: An assessment. Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences, 4955-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.12.003
Polonioli, Andrea. "Stanovich's arguments against the "adaptive rationality" project: An assessment." Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences vol. 49 (2015): 55-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.12.003
Polonioli A. Stanovich's arguments against the "adaptive rationality" project: An assessment. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2015 Feb;49:55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.12.003. Epub 2015 Jan 22. PMID: 25617703.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Showing 13 to 24 of 876 entries