Display options
Cite
Bagley DH, Felix EL, Sindelar WF, et al. Barium enema, proctosigmoidoscopy and upper gastrointestinal series in the preoperative evaluation of the cancer patient. Cancer. 1977;39(4):1743-7doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197704)39:4<1743::aid-cncr2820390454>3.0.co;2-2.
Bagley, D. H., Felix, E. L., Sindelar, W. F., Doppman, J. L., & Ketcham, A. S. (1977). Barium enema, proctosigmoidoscopy and upper gastrointestinal series in the preoperative evaluation of the cancer patient. Cancer, 39(4), 1743-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197704)39:4<1743::aid-cncr2820390454>3.0.co;2-2
Bagley, D H, et al. "Barium enema, proctosigmoidoscopy and upper gastrointestinal series in the preoperative evaluation of the cancer patient." Cancer vol. 39,4 (1977): 1743-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197704)39:4<1743::aid-cncr2820390454>3.0.co;2-2
Bagley DH, Felix EL, Sindelar WF, Doppman JL, Ketcham AS. Barium enema, proctosigmoidoscopy and upper gastrointestinal series in the preoperative evaluation of the cancer patient. Cancer. 1977 Apr;39(4):1743-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197704)39:4<1743::aid-cncr2820390454>3.0.co;2-2. PMID: 856453.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Cancer. 1977 Apr;39(4):1743-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197704)39:4<1743::aid-cncr2820390454>3.0.co;2-2.

Barium enema, proctosigmoidoscopy and upper gastrointestinal series in the preoperative evaluation of the cancer patient.

Cancer

D H Bagley, E L Felix, W F Sindelar, J L Doppman, A S Ketcham

PMID: 856453 DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197704)39:4<1743::aid-cncr2820390454>3.0.co;2-2

Abstract

Charts of 566 patients admitted to the Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute over a five year period were reviewed. Routine upper gastrointestinal series was performed in 453 patients; barium enemas in 490; and proctosigmoidoscopies in 342. Upper gastrointestinal series detected no metastases or second primary malignancies but delineated the extent of large intra-abdominal tumors. Barium enema and proctosigmoidoscopy together revealed three unsuspected primary colonic tumors (1.2% in patients over 50 years of age). Sigmoidoscopy and examination of the stool for occult blood would have detected the same patients. Barium enema may be limited to surgical cancer patients in whom the extent of local tumor invasion is to be defined and to older patients in whom colonic tumors are suspected. Neither UGIS nor barium enema appear to be of value as a routine preoperative screening test in surgical cancer patients.

Similar articles

Substances

MeSH terms

Publication Types