Display options
Cite
Lazorthes Y, Verdie JC, Arbus L. Stimulation analgésique médullaire antérieure et postérieure par technique d'implantation percutanée. [Anterior and posterior medullary analgesic stimulation, using a percutaneous implantation technic]. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1978;40(3):277-83doi: 10.1007/BF01774751.
Lazorthes, Y., Verdie, J. C., & Arbus, L. (1978). Stimulation analgésique médullaire antérieure et postérieure par technique d'implantation percutanée. [Anterior and posterior medullary analgesic stimulation, using a percutaneous implantation technic]. Acta neurochirurgica, 40(3), 277-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01774751
Lazorthes, Y, et al. "Stimulation analgésique médullaire antérieure et postérieure par technique d'implantation percutanée." [Anterior and posterior medullary analgesic stimulation, using a percutaneous implantation technic]. Acta neurochirurgica vol. 40,3 (1978): 277-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01774751
Lazorthes Y, Verdie JC, Arbus L. Stimulation analgésique médullaire antérieure et postérieure par technique d'implantation percutanée. [Anterior and posterior medullary analgesic stimulation, using a percutaneous implantation technic]. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1978;40(3):277-83. doi: 10.1007/BF01774751. French. PMID: 79303.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1978;40(3):277-83. doi: 10.1007/BF01774751.

[Anterior and posterior medullary analgesic stimulation, using a percutaneous implantation technic].

Acta neurochirurgica

[Article in French]
Y Lazorthes, J C Verdie, L Arbus

PMID: 79303 DOI: 10.1007/BF01774751

Abstract

The technique of percutaneous implantation of a pain-relieving stimulator reduces the surgical procedure considerably. This advantage is, however, lessened by the absence of precision in placing epidural electrodes, and by the risk of their later displacement leading to inadequate stimulation. To reduce this disadvantage the authors suggest a technique that is a modification of the classical open procedure: it is particularly suitable for implantation at the cervico-dorsal junction. In 12 patients treated by percutaneous implantation, 5 received, from epidural electrodes, an anterior medullary electrical stimulation which caused analgesia without paraesthesiae in the painful ares. The results, however, do not justify a conclusion that anterior medullary stimulation is better than posterior column stimulation.

Similar articles

References

  1. Exp Neurol. 1974 May;43(2):369-74 - PubMed
  2. Clin Neurosurg. 1974;21:278-310 - PubMed
  3. Surg Neurol. 1975 Jul;4(1):187-94 - PubMed
  4. Nature. 1975 Dec 18;258(5536):577-80 - PubMed
  5. Arch Neurol. 1975 Dec;32(12):826-9 - PubMed
  6. J Neurosurg. 1975 Oct;43(4):440-4 - PubMed
  7. Surg Neurol. 1975 Jul;4(1):180-6 - PubMed
  8. Brain Res. 1974 Mar 15;68(1):73-93 - PubMed
  9. Science. 1973 Jun 15;180(4091):1201-2 - PubMed
  10. Neurochirurgie. 1975 May-Jun;21(3):191-203 - PubMed
  11. J Neurosurg. 1972 Aug;37(2):242-5 - PubMed
  12. Surg Neurol. 1975 Jul;4(1):195-8 - PubMed
  13. Science. 1965 Nov 19;150(3699):971-9 - PubMed
  14. Exp Brain Res. 1974 Apr 30;20(1):32-44 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types