Display options
Cite
Baumann H, Hou E, Jahreis GP. Preferential degradation of the terminal carbohydrate moiety of membrane glycoproteins in rat hepatoma cells and after transfer to the membranes of mouse fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1983;96(1):139-50doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.1.139.
Baumann, H., Hou, E., & Jahreis, G. P. (1983). Preferential degradation of the terminal carbohydrate moiety of membrane glycoproteins in rat hepatoma cells and after transfer to the membranes of mouse fibroblasts. The Journal of cell biology, 96(1), 139-50. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.96.1.139
Baumann, H, et al. "Preferential degradation of the terminal carbohydrate moiety of membrane glycoproteins in rat hepatoma cells and after transfer to the membranes of mouse fibroblasts." The Journal of cell biology vol. 96,1 (1983): 139-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.96.1.139
Baumann H, Hou E, Jahreis GP. Preferential degradation of the terminal carbohydrate moiety of membrane glycoproteins in rat hepatoma cells and after transfer to the membranes of mouse fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1983 Jan;96(1):139-50. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.1.139. PMID: 6826644; PMCID: PMC2112275.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on
Full text links
Silverchair Information Systems Free PMC Article

J Cell Biol. 1983 Jan;96(1):139-50. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.1.139.

Preferential degradation of the terminal carbohydrate moiety of membrane glycoproteins in rat hepatoma cells and after transfer to the membranes of mouse fibroblasts.

The Journal of cell biology

H Baumann, E Hou, G P Jahreis

PMID: 6826644 PMCID: PMC2112275 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.96.1.139
Free PMC Article

Abstract

Glycoproteins in the plasma membrane of rat hepatoma cells were labeled at their externally exposed tyrosine residues with 131I and at their galactose and sialic acid residues with 3H. The degradation of both isotopes in the total cell protein fraction, in glycoproteins purified by concanavalin A, and in glycoproteins separated on two-dimensional gels was determined. Similarly, the total cellular membrane glycoproteins were metabolically labeled with [35S]methionine and [3H]fucose. The fate of both incorporated labels was followed by lectin chromatography or by precipitation of the proteins with specific antibodies followed by electrophoretic gel separation. In both labeling experiments, the carbohydrate markers were lost from the ligand-recognized fraction with similar kinetics as from the total cell protein fraction. In some glycoprotein species which were separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, the polypeptide portion exhibited up to a twofold slower rate of degradation relative to that of the carbohydrate moiety. This difference is most pronounced in carbohydrate-rich glycoproteins. To corroborate this finding, double-labeled membrane glycoproteins were incorporated into reconstituted phospholipid vesicles which were then transferred via fusion into the plasma membrane of mouse fibroblasts. Both the polypeptide and carbohydrate moieties of the transferred membrane glycoproteins were degraded with the same relative kinetics as in the original hepatoma cells. The rate of degradation is mostly a function of the structural properties of the membrane components as shown by the preservation of metabolically stable fucogangliosides of Reuber H-35 hepatoma cells transferred onto the fibroblasts. The technique of insertion of membrane components into the plasma membrane of another cell should assist in the elucidation of the exact route and mechanism of membrane protein destruction.

References

  1. J Biol Chem. 1979 Apr 10;254(7):2542-50 - PubMed
  2. J Biol Chem. 1979 May 25;254(10):3935-46 - PubMed
  3. Cancer Res. 1979 Jul;39(7 Pt 1):2637-43 - PubMed
  4. J Biol Chem. 1979 Jun 25;254(12):5000-7 - PubMed
  5. Life Sci. 1979 Mar 12;24(11):951-66 - PubMed
  6. J Biol Chem. 1979 Aug 10;254(15):6853-6 - PubMed
  7. J Cell Biol. 1979 Feb;80(2):427-43 - PubMed
  8. Cancer Res. 1979 Sep;39(9):3540-8 - PubMed
  9. J Cell Biol. 1979 Aug;82(2):449-65 - PubMed
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Aug;76(8):3824-8 - PubMed
  11. J Supramol Struct. 1979;12(2):151-64 - PubMed
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Apr;77(4):1828-31 - PubMed
  13. J Biol Chem. 1980 Jun 25;255(12):5816-25 - PubMed
  14. J Biol Chem. 1980 Oct 25;255(20):10001-12 - PubMed
  15. Cell. 1980 Oct;21(3):897-907 - PubMed
  16. J Biol Chem. 1969 Jun 25;244(12):3303-15 - PubMed
  17. J Biol Chem. 1971 Mar 25;246(6):1889-94 - PubMed
  18. J Biol Chem. 1973 Jun 25;248(12):4311-7 - PubMed
  19. Eur J Biochem. 1974 Jul 1;46(1):83-8 - PubMed
  20. Anal Biochem. 1974 Jul;60(1):149-52 - PubMed
  21. J Biol Chem. 1975 May 25;250(10):4007-21 - PubMed
  22. J Biol Chem. 1976 Feb 10;251(3):872-82 - PubMed
  23. J Supramol Struct. 1976;4(2):141-59 - PubMed
  24. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Aug;73(8):2781-7 - PubMed
  25. Annu Rev Biochem. 1977;46:669-722 - PubMed
  26. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Nov;74(11):5073-7 - PubMed
  27. J Biol Chem. 1978 Feb 10;253(3):965-73 - PubMed
  28. J Biol Chem. 1978 Jun 25;253(12):4408-18 - PubMed
  29. J Biol Chem. 1979 Feb 25;254(4):1038-43 - PubMed

Substances

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support

LinkOut - more resources