Display options
Share it on

Arch Gynakol. 1978 Oct 18;225(4):293-303. doi: 10.1007/BF02570573.

[Endocervical form of the vaginal adenosis (author's transl)].

Archiv fur Gynakologie

[Article in German]
K A Walz, H Metzger, H Ludwig

PMID: 581443 DOI: 10.1007/BF02570573

Abstract

Vaginal adenosis is a rare kind of disease without specific symptoms and does not represent a very serious disorder from the beginning. Concerning the etiology teratogenetic dependencies are known which still are interpreted in different ways in the recent literature. The increased number of cases, including those with clear-cell-carcinoma of the vagina, in juveniles after exposition to DES during the early embryonal development shows in particular (Central index for the stilbestrol-adenosis-carcinoma-syndrome in the USA, since 1971) a wrong pathway in the organogenesis of cervix and vagina. This occurs at the interference zone between the epithelium of the Müllerian ducts and the epithelium of the sinus urogenitalis of the female fetus and in so far constitutes the origin of vaginal adenosis. The basics of the possibility of the development of such irregular differentiation and heterotopic dissemination are proven again by the case report of a vaginal adenosis showing the highly differentiated endocervical type. Not every case of vaginal adenosis does signify a precancerous lesion. The separation of the most frequently endocervical manifestation observed from endometrial and intermediate forms might be difficult. A positive distinction is prognostically essential, however, since clear-cell-carcinomas of the vagina are known in occurence with the endometrial type of vaginal adenosis only. Scanning electron microscopy as a method to follow tissue organization reveals the way of differentiation between the various types via ultrastructural analysis for vaginal adenosis is an example for failures of developmental organization. The same analysis is feasible in cytological smears also. The therapeutic requirements of vaginal adenosis depend on the tissular differentiation and the given local extent of the adenomatous lesions.

Similar articles

Show all 10 similar articles

References

  1. Obstet Gynecol. 1974 Oct;44(4):531-45 - PubMed
  2. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Jul 1;128(5):550-5 - PubMed
  3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972 May 1;113(1):83-7 - PubMed
  4. Cancer. 1970 Apr;25(4):745-57 - PubMed
  5. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Sep 15;126(2):170-80 - PubMed
  6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1968 Jun 1;101(3):322-34 - PubMed
  7. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1957 Mar;73(3):641-55; discussion, 655-6 - PubMed
  8. Neoplasma. 1961;8:433-7 - PubMed
  9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973 Apr 1;115(7):1025-43 - PubMed
  10. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Jan 1;121(1):101-4 - PubMed
  11. Acta Cytol. 1974 Jul-Aug;18(4):279-90 - PubMed
  12. J Reprod Med. 1975 Jul;15(1):13-18 - PubMed
  13. Obstet Gynecol. 1974 Jan;43(1):118-28 - PubMed
  14. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1975 May;35(5):329-33 - PubMed
  15. Acta Cytol. 1973 Jan-Feb;17(1):59-63 - PubMed
  16. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1960 Feb;67:24-31 - PubMed
  17. Cancer. 1972 Jun;29(6):1680-90 - PubMed
  18. Cancer. 1967 Sep;20(9):1405-17 - PubMed
  19. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974 Nov 1;120(5):666-77 - PubMed
  20. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Dec 1;126(7):769-76 - PubMed
  21. Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Aug;48(2):246-50 - PubMed

Substances

MeSH terms

Publication Types