Display options
Share it on
Full text links
Scopus

2009;15:167-190. doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v15.i2.40.

Who's persisting in engineering? A comparative analysis of female and male Asian, black, Hispanic, Native American, and white students.

Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering

Ohland M.W., Layton R.A., Lord S.M., Camacho M.M., Long R.A., Wasburn M.H.

UIID-AC: 87 DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v15.i2.40

Abstract

Interest in increasing the number of engineering graduates in the United States and promoting gender equality and diversification of the profession has encouraged considerable research on women and minorities in engineering programs. Drawing on a framework of intersectionality theory, this study recognizes that women of different ethnic backgrounds warrant disaggregated analysis because they do not necessarily share a common experience in engineering education. Using a longitudinal, comprehensive dataset of more than 79,000 students who matriculated in engineering at nine universities, this research examines the question: How does the persistence of engineering students (measured as enrollment to the eighth semester) vary by disaggregated combinations of gender and race/ethnicity? Findings reveal that for Asian, Black, Hispanic, Native American, and White students, women who matriculate in engineering are most likely to persist in engineering compared to other eighth-semester destinations and, except for Native Americans, do so at rates comparable to those of men. Thus, contrary to considerable popular opinion that there is a gender gap in persistence, the low representation of women in the later years of engineering programs is primarily a reflection of their low representation at matriculation. Copyright © 2009 by Begell House, Inc.

Publication Types