Home
About Us
UI Blog
Contact Us
Clipboard & History
Search history (0)
Clipboard (0)
searchable interface
Affiliation
All Fields
Author
Author - First
Author - Identifier
Author - Last
Book
Conflict of Interest Statements
Editor
Issue
Journal
Language
MeSH Terms
Pagination
Publication Type
Publication Year
Publisher
Title
Title/Abstract
Transliterated Title
Volume
Find
Please fill out this field.
Display options
Format
Abstract
PubMed
PMID
Save
Email
Cite
Cite
AMA
Johnson L., Lee A., Green B.. The PhD and the Autonomous Self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy. 2000;25
APA
Johnson L., Lee A., & Green B. (2000). The PhD and the Autonomous Self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy.
Studies in Higher Education
, 25.
MLA
Johnson L., et al. "The PhD and the Autonomous Self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy."
Studies in Higher Education
vol. 25 (2000).
NLM
Johnson L., Lee A., Green B.. The PhD and the Autonomous Self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy. 2000;25. UIID-AC: 28.
Copy
Download .nbib
Format:
NLM
AMA
APA
MLA
NLM
Send to
Clipboard
My Bibliography
Collections
Citation Manager
Share it on
Link
Direct link
Direct link
Full text links
2000;25.
The PhD and the Autonomous Self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy.
Studies in Higher Education
Johnson L.
,
Lee A.
,
Green B.
UIID-AC: 28
Abstract
Interventions in the quality of research training provided in universities today focus largely on educating supervisors and monitoring their performance as well as student progress. More private than any other scene of teaching and learning, postgraduate supervision - and more generally the pedagogic practices of the PhD - has largely remained unscrutinised and unquestioned. This article explores the problematic character of ideas of autonomy and the independent scholar that underpin the traditional practices of postgraduate pedagogy, particularly in the humanities and social sciences disciplines. These ideas are found to guide the practices of several different models of the supervisory relationship, whether they be of a pastoral care or more distant kind. The gendered character of the ideas of autonomy and the subject of knowledge that underlie these practices of postgraduate pedagogy are examined, as is the paradoxical nature of the processes of the production of the autonomous scholar self. The article concludes by suggesting some possible lines of thought for the future in addressing the problems in doctoral education identified through this analysis.
Publication Types
Journal Article
Save results to a file
No records selected. Please select records to continue.
Format
Summary (text)
PubMed
PMID
Abstract (text)
CSV
Email results
Only first 240 records will be saved in your file.
No records selected. Please select records to continue.
Email subject
UIINDEX - UIID-AC: 28
Send email to
Format
Summary
Summary (text)
Abstract
Abstract (text)
Captcha
Citation copied successfully.