Display options
Share it on

Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Nov 01;176(9):777-84. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws173. Epub 2012 Oct 16.

On the reciprocal association between loneliness and subjective well-being.

American journal of epidemiology

Tyler J VanderWeele, Louise C Hawkley, John T Cacioppo

Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. [email protected]

PMID: 23077285 PMCID: PMC3571255 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws173

Abstract

Loneliness has been shown to longitudinally predict subjective well-being. The authors used data from a longitudinal population-based study (2002-2006) of non-Hispanic white, African-American, and nonblack Latino-American persons born between 1935 and 1952 and living in Cook County, Illinois. They applied marginal structural models for time-varying exposures to examine the magnitude and persistence of the effects of loneliness on subjective well-being and of subjective well-being on loneliness. Their results indicate that, if interventions on loneliness were made 1 and 2 years prior to assessing final subjective well-being, then only the intervention 1 year prior would have an effect (standardized effect = -0.29). In contrast, increases in subjective well-being 1 year prior (standardized effect = -0.26) and 2 years prior (standardized effect = -0.13) to assessing final loneliness would both have an effect on an individual's final loneliness. These effects persist even after control is made for depressive symptoms, social support, and psychiatric conditions and medications as time-varying confounders. Results from this study indicate an asymmetrical and persistent feedback of fairly substantial magnitude between loneliness and subjective well-being. Mechanisms responsible for the asymmetry are discussed. Developing interventions for loneliness and subjective well-being could have substantial psychological and health benefits.

References

  1. Emotion. 2012 Oct;12(5):908-12 - PubMed
  2. Prev Sci. 2006 Mar;7(1):1-17 - PubMed
  3. Health Psychol. 2005 May;24(3):297-306 - PubMed
  4. Ann Behav Med. 2010 Oct;40(2):218-27 - PubMed
  5. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5 - PubMed
  6. Genome Biol. 2007;8(9):R189 - PubMed
  7. Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Sep 15;168(6):656-64 - PubMed
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Nov 7;103(45):17058-63 - PubMed
  9. Psychol Aging. 2010 Jun;25(2):453-63 - PubMed
  10. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2004 May-Jun;38(3):239-50 - PubMed
  11. Nurs Res. 1999 Jul-Aug;48(4):215-9 - PubMed
  12. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Apr;79(2):225-35 - PubMed
  13. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011 Aug;15(3):219-66 - PubMed
  14. J Affect Disord. 2005 Dec;89(1-3):79-89 - PubMed
  15. Health Psychol. 2010 Jan;29(1):9-19 - PubMed
  16. Psychol Aging. 2006 Mar;21(1):152-64 - PubMed
  17. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1995 May-Jun;16(3):185-200 - PubMed
  18. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Dec;97(6):977-91 - PubMed
  19. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jun;52(6):1132-47 - PubMed
  20. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1994 Feb;29(1):46-51 - PubMed
  21. Ann Stat. 2011 Feb;39(1): - PubMed
  22. Psychol Aging. 2006 Mar;21(1):140-51 - PubMed
  23. Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Oct 1;176(7):608-12 - PubMed
  24. J Psychol. 2012 Jan-Apr;146(1-2):23-36 - PubMed
  25. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Oct;13(10):447-54 - PubMed
  26. Psychol Bull. 1990 Sep;108(2):257-66 - PubMed
  27. J Pers Assess. 1996 Feb;66(1):20-40 - PubMed
  28. J Health Soc Behav. 2009 Mar;50(1):31-48 - PubMed
  29. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980 Dec;39(6):1238-44 - PubMed
  30. Epidemiology. 2011 Jan;22(1):42-52 - PubMed
  31. Epidemiology. 2000 Sep;11(5):550-60 - PubMed
  32. Psychol Sci. 2002 Mar;13(2):172-5 - PubMed
  33. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Aug;160(8):805-11 - PubMed
  34. Psychosom Med. 1984 Jan-Feb;46(1):7-14 - PubMed
  35. Qual Life Res. 2006 May;15(4):675-86 - PubMed
  36. Stat Med. 2002 Jun 30;21(12):1689-709 - PubMed
  37. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1992 Sep;86(3):213-7 - PubMed
  38. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980 Sep;39(3):472-80 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support