Display options
Cite
Rifkin SB, Muller F, Bichmann W. Primary health care: on measuring participation. Soc Sci Med. 1988;26(9):931-40doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90413-3.
Rifkin, S. B., Muller, F., & Bichmann, W. (1988). Primary health care: on measuring participation. Social science & medicine (1982), 26(9), 931-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(88)90413-3
Rifkin, S B, et al. "Primary health care: on measuring participation." Social science & medicine (1982) vol. 26,9 (1988): 931-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(88)90413-3
Rifkin SB, Muller F, Bichmann W. Primary health care: on measuring participation. Soc Sci Med. 1988;26(9):931-40. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90413-3. PMID: 3388072.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Soc Sci Med. 1988;26(9):931-40. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90413-3.

Primary health care: on measuring participation.

Social science & medicine (1982)

S B Rifkin, F Muller, W Bichmann

Affiliations

  1. Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, England.

PMID: 3388072 DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90413-3

Abstract

This paper considers the problems of finding measurements for the two major principles of primary health care (PHC), equity and participation. Although both are of equal importance, the authors concentrate on the assessment of participation. A methodology is put forward to define indicators for participation in health care programmes as how wide participation is on a continuum developed for each of the five factors which influence community participation. These factors are: needs assessment leadership, organisation, resource mobilisation and management. By plotting a mark on a continuum which is defined as wide and narrow at the extremes and is connected with all other marks in a spoke arrangement, it is possible to describe a baseline for participation in any specific health programme. This baseline can be used to compare the same programme at a different point in time, to compare observations by different evaluators, and/or to compare perceptions of different participants in the same programmes. A case study provides an example of how the indicators might be used. These indicators focus on the breadth of participation and not its potential social impact, an area which is recognised to be critical for future research.

Cited by

MeSH terms

Publication Types