Display options
Share it on

J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Oct 01; doi: 10.1007/s11673-021-10125-z. Epub 2021 Oct 01.

Care for Language: Etymology as a Continental Argument in Bioethics.

Journal of bioethical inquiry

Hub Zwart

Affiliations

  1. Dean Erasmus School of Philosophy, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Bayle Building, Room J5-65, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. [email protected].

PMID: 34596833 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-021-10125-z

Abstract

Emphasizing the importance of language is a key characteristic of philosophical reflection in general and of bioethics in particular. Rather than trying to eliminate the historicity and ambiguity of language, a continental approach to bioethics will make conscious use of it, for instance by closely studying the history of the key terms we employ in bioethical debates. Continental bioethics entails a focus on the historical vicissitudes of the key signifiers of the bioethical vocabulary, urging us to study the history of terms such as "bioethics," "autonomy," "privacy," and "consensus." Instead of trying to define such terms as clearly and unequivocally as possible, a continental approach rather requires us to take a step backwards, tracing the historical backdrop of the words currently in vogue. By comparing the original meanings of terms with their current meanings, and by considering important moments of transition in their history, obfuscated dimensions of meaning can be retrieved. Thus, notwithstanding a number of methodological challenges involved in etymological exercises, they may foster moral articulacy and enhance our ability to come to terms with moral dilemmas we are facing.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Keywords: Continental bioethics; Continental philosophy of language; Etymology and ethics; Philosophical methodology

References

  1. Beaney, M. 2013. What is analytic philosophy? In The Oxford handbook of the history of analytical philosophy, edited by M. Beaney. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238842.013.0039 - PubMed
  2. American Heart Association (AHA) / American College of Cardiology (ACC). 2020. Consensus statement on medical professionalism and ethics. https://www.thecardiologyadvisor.com/general-cardiology/aha-and-acc-update-their-medical-ethics-and-professional-guidelines-for-2020/ . Accessed 21 May 2021 - PubMed
  3. Bergdolt, K. 1999/2008. Wellbeing: A cultural history of healthy living. Cambridge: Polity Press. - PubMed
  4. Bockris, V. 2014. Transformer: The complete Lou Reed story. London: Harper. - PubMed
  5. Childress, J.F. 1990. The Place of autonomy in bioethics. The Hastings Centre Report 20: 12–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/3562967 - PubMed
  6. Culbertson C. 2019. Words underway: Continental philosophy of language. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield. - PubMed
  7. Demaitre, L. 2013. Medieval medicine: The art of healing, from head to toe. Santa Barbara / Denver: Praeger. - PubMed
  8. Derrida, J. 1996. La religion. Paris: Seuil. - PubMed
  9. Engelhardt H.T. 1986. The foundations of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press. - PubMed
  10. Freud, S. 1910/1943. Über der Gegensinn der Urworte. Gesammelte Werke 8. London: Imago. - PubMed
  11. Gillett G. 2015. Culture, truth, and science after Lacan. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12(4): 633–644. - PubMed
  12. Gillett, G., and L. Bowyer. 2014. Bioethics and literature: An exciting overlap. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11(2):135–136. - PubMed
  13. Gillett, G., and R. Hankey. 2014. Duties to kin, through a tragicomic lens. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11(2): 173–180. - PubMed
  14. Heidegger M. 1954/2002. Was heißt denken? [What is called thinking?]. Gesamtausgabe, Band 8. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann. - PubMed
  15. ————. 1951/2000. Logos (Heraklit, Fragment 50). In Gesamtausgabe. I. Abteilung: Veröffentlichte Schriften 1914–1970. Band 7: Vorträge und Aufsätze, 211–234. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann (GßA7). - PubMed
  16. ————. 1992. Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik, Welt—Endlichkeit—Einsamkeit. Gesamtausgabe, Band 29–30. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann (GA29-30). - PubMed
  17. Klink, B. van, H. Jansen, and I. van der Geest, eds. 2020 Vox populi: Populism as a rhetorical and democratic challenge. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. - PubMed
  18. Lafont, C. 2015. Continental philosophy of language. In International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, 2nd ed., edited by J. Wright, 790–795. Amsterdam: Elsevier. - PubMed
  19. Leder, D. 1999. Whose body? What body? The metaphysics of organ transplantation. In Persons and their bodies: Rights, responsibilities, relationships, edited by M.J. Cherry, 233–264. Dordrecht: Kluwer. - PubMed
  20. Martensen, R. 2001. The history of bioethics: An essay review. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 56(2): 168–175. - PubMed
  21. Meilaender, G. 2020. Bioethics and the character of human life. Eugene: Cascade. - PubMed
  22. Mill, J.S. 1859/1974. On liberty. Harmondsworth: Penguin. - PubMed
  23. Mills, C. 2010. Continental philosophy and bioethics. Editorial. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7(2): 145–148. - PubMed
  24. Nancy, J.-L. 2000. L’Intrus. Paris: Éditions GalilÉe Press. - PubMed
  25. Nietzsche, F. 1887/1980. Genealogie der Moral. Sämtliche Werke V (Kritische Studienausgabe). München/Berlin/New York: DTV/De Gruyter. - PubMed
  26. Nunner-Winkler G. 2008. From super-ego and conformist habitus to ego-syntonic moral motivation: Socio-historic changes in moral motivation. European Journal of Developmental Science 2(3): 251–268. - PubMed
  27. Pugh J. 2021. Genetic information, insurance and a pluralistic approach to justice. Journal of Medical Ethics. Online ahead of print, April 15. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106913 - PubMed
  28. Saussure F. de 1916/1968. Course de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot. - PubMed
  29. Sass, Hans-Martin 2007. Fritz Jahr’s 1927 concept of bioethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17(4): 279–295. - PubMed
  30. Schermer, M. 2002. Autonomy in medical ethics: Issues of informed consent. In The different faces of autonomy, 23–44. Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9972-6_2 - PubMed
  31. Society of Critical Care Medicine. 1997. Consensus statement of the Society of Critical Care Medicine’s Ethics Committee regarding futile and other possibly inadvisable treatments. Critical Care Medicine 25(5): 887–891. - PubMed
  32. Stanley J. 1989. The Appleton consensus: Suggested international guidelines for decisions to forego medical treatment. Journal of Medical Ethics 15(3):129–136. - PubMed
  33. Svenaeus, F. 2010. The body as gift, resource or commodity? Heidegger and the ethics of organ transplantation. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7(2):163–172. - PubMed
  34. Varelius, J. 2006. The value of autonomy in medical ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 9(3): 377–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-006-9000-z - PubMed
  35. Vivekananda-Schmidt P., and C. Hooper. 2020. Medical ethics and law for doctors of tomorrow: The consensus statement restructured and refined for the next decade. Journal of Medical Ethics. Online ahead of print, December 21. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-107068 - PubMed
  36. Zwart, H. 1993. Ethische consensus in een pluralistische samenleving: De gezondheidsethiek als casus. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers. - PubMed
  37. Zwart, H. 1994. The resurgence of nature-speak. Health Care Analysis 2/3: 221–226. - PubMed
  38. Zwart, H. 2001. consensus formation as a basic strategy in ethics. In Bioethics in a European perspective, edited by H. ten Have and B. Gordijn, 281–288. Dordrecht: Kluwer. - PubMed
  39. Zwart, H. 2016. Psychoanalysis and bioethics: A Lacanian approach to bioethical discourse. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 19(4): 605–621. - PubMed
  40. Zwart, H. 2017. “Extimate” technologies and techno-cultural discontent: A Lacanian analysis of pervasive gadgets. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21(1): 24–54. - PubMed
  41. Zwart, H. 2018. Method of avoidance or exercise in retrieval? A Lacanian assessment of bioethics discourse. Ethical Perspectives 25(4): 753–793. - PubMed
  42. Zwart, H. 2019. Purloined organs: Psychoanalysis of transplant organs as objects of desire. New York: Palgrave MacMillan / Springer Nature. - PubMed
  43. Zwart, H. 2020. Coming to terms with technoscience: The Heideggerian way. Human Studies 43(3): 385–408. - PubMed

Publication Types