Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 13;10:CD006237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006237.pub4.
Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
Karen Nieuwenhuijsen, Jos H Verbeek, Angela Neumeyer-Gromen, Arco C Verhoeven, Ute Bültmann, Babs Faber
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Cochrane Work Review Group, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Deutsche Krankenhausgesellschaft (The German Hospital Federation), Berlin, Germany.
- SGBO, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
- Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
- Coronel Institute of Occupational Health/Dutch Research Center for Insurance Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
PMID: 33052607
PMCID: PMC8094165 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006237.pub4
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Work disability such as sickness absence is common in people with depression.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing work disability in employees with depressive disorders.
SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO until April 4th 2020.
SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs of work-directed and clinical interventions for depressed people that included days of sickness absence or being off work as an outcome. We also analysed the effects on depression and work functioning.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted the data and rated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We used standardised mean differences (SMDs) or risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to pool study results in studies we judged to be sufficiently similar. MAIN RESULTS: In this update, we added 23 new studies. In total, we included 45 studies with 88 study arms, involving 12,109 participants with either a major depressive disorder or a high level of depressive symptoms. Risk of bias The most common types of bias risk were detection bias (27 studies) and attrition bias (22 studies), both for the outcome of sickness absence. Work-directed interventions Work-directed interventions combined with clinical interventions A combination of a work-directed intervention and a clinical intervention probably reduces days of sickness absence within the first year of follow-up (SMD -0.25, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.12; 9 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). This translates back to 0.5 fewer (95% CI -0.7 to -0.2) sick leave days in the past two weeks or 25 fewer days during one year (95% CI -37.5 to -11.8). The intervention does not lead to fewer persons being off work beyond one year follow-up (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.09; 2 studies, high-certainty evidence). The intervention may reduce depressive symptoms (SMD -0.25, 95% CI -0.49 to -0.01; 8 studies, low-certainty evidence) and probably has a small effect on work functioning (SMD -0.19, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.06; 5 studies, moderate-certainty evidence) within the first year of follow-up. Stand alone work-directed interventions A specific work-directed intervention alone may increase the number of sickness absence days compared with work-directed care as usual (SMD 0.39, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.74; 2 studies, low-certainty evidence) but probably does not lead to more people being off work within the first year of follow-up (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.11; 1 study, moderate-certainty evidence) or beyond (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.22; 2 studies, moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably no effect on depressive symptoms (SMD -0.10, 95% -0.30 CI to 0.10; 4 studies, moderate-certainty evidence) within the first year of follow-up and there may be no effect on depressive symptoms beyond that time (SMD 0.18, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.49; 1 study, low-certainty evidence). The intervention may also not lead to better work functioning (SMD -0.32, 95% CI -0.90 to 0.26; 1 study, low-certainty evidence) within the first year of follow-up. Psychological interventions A psychological intervention, either face-to-face, or an E-mental health intervention, with or without professional guidance, may reduce the number of sickness absence days, compared with care as usual (SMD -0.15, 95% CI -0.28 to -0.03; 9 studies, low-certainty evidence). It may also reduce depressive symptoms (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -0.45 to -0.15, 8 studies, low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether these psychological interventions improve work ability (SMD -0.15 95% CI -0.46 to 0.57; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). Psychological intervention combined with antidepressant medication Two studies compared the effect of a psychological intervention combined with antidepressants to antidepressants alone. One study combined psychodynamic therapy with tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) medication and another combined telephone-administered cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). We are uncertain if this intervention reduces the number of sickness absence days (SMD -0.38, 95% CI -0.99 to 0.24; 2 studies, very low-certainty evidence) but found that there may be no effect on depressive symptoms (SMD -0.19, 95% CI -0.50 to 0.12; 2 studies, low-certainty evidence). Antidepressant medication only Three studies compared the effectiveness of SSRI to selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) medication on reducing sickness absence and yielded highly inconsistent results. Improved care Overall, interventions to improve care did not lead to fewer days of sickness absence, compared to care as usual (SMD -0.05, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.06; 7 studies, moderate-certainty evidence). However, in studies with a low risk of bias, the intervention probably leads to fewer days of sickness absence in the first year of follow-up (SMD -0.20, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.05; 2 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Improved care probably leads to fewer depressive symptoms (SMD -0.21, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.07; 7 studies, moderate-certainty evidence) but may possibly lead to a decrease in work-functioning (SMD 0.5, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.66; 1 study; moderate-certainty evidence). Exercise Supervised strength exercise may reduce sickness absence, compared to relaxation (SMD -1.11; 95% CI -1.68 to -0.54; one study, low-certainty evidence). However, aerobic exercise probably is not more effective than relaxation or stretching (SMD -0.06; 95% CI -0.36 to 0.24; 2 studies, moderate-certainty evidence). Both studies found no differences between the two conditions in depressive symptoms.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: A combination of a work-directed intervention and a clinical intervention probably reduces the number of sickness absence days, but at the end of one year or longer follow-up, this does not lead to more people in the intervention group being at work. The intervention may also reduce depressive symptoms and probably increases work functioning more than care as usual. Specific work-directed interventions may not be more effective than usual work-directed care alone. Psychological interventions may reduce the number of sickness absence days, compared with care as usual. Interventions to improve clinical care probably lead to lower sickness absence and lower levels of depression, compared with care as usual. There was no evidence of a difference in effect on sickness absence of one antidepressant medication compared to another. Further research is needed to assess which combination of work-directed and clinical interventions works best.
Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
References
- J Clin Psychiatry. 2000 Apr;61(4):268-75 - PubMed
- Occup Environ Med. 2017 Dec;74(12):905-912 - PubMed
- Occup Environ Med. 2005 Feb;62(2):74-9 - PubMed
- Int J Group Psychother. 2011 Oct;61(4):539-55 - PubMed
- J Occup Environ Med. 2010 Aug;52(8):778-90 - PubMed
- Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 Jan 1;45(1):33-41 - PubMed
- BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Oct 18;14:290 - PubMed
- Ind Health. 2010;48(4):495-502 - PubMed
- Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2014 Dec;12(3):180-8 - PubMed
- Internet Interv. 2019 May 03;17:100247 - PubMed
- Stat Med. 2002 Oct 15;21(19):2971-80 - PubMed
- JAMA. 2007 Sep 26;298(12):1401-11 - PubMed
- Can J Occup Ther. 2018 Feb;85(1):21-32 - PubMed
- J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Dec;95:28-36 - PubMed
- BMC Public Health. 2014 Aug 07;14:807 - PubMed
- J Affect Disord. 1996 Feb 12;37(1):31-41 - PubMed
- J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011 Oct;31(5):569-76 - PubMed
- BMC Psychiatry. 2007 Dec 19;7:72 - PubMed
- J Negat Results Biomed. 2017 Aug 22;16(1):13 - PubMed
- Trials. 2015 Mar 17;16:98 - PubMed
- BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 1;18(1):166 - PubMed
- Occup Environ Med. 2005 Oct;62(10):682-7 - PubMed
- Occup Environ Med. 2005 Aug;62(8):538-45 - PubMed
- J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Dec;59(12):1211-1220 - PubMed
- JAMA. 1989 Aug 18;262(7):914-9 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 13;17(5):e116 - PubMed
- Psychol Med. 2012 Feb;42(2):327-34 - PubMed
- CNS Spectr. 2019 Jun;24(3):322-332 - PubMed
- J Occup Environ Med. 2004 Jun;46(6 Suppl):S38-45 - PubMed
- Trials. 2011 Jan 13;12:11 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2009 May 11;11(2):e15 - PubMed
- Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014 Nov;40(6):582-96 - PubMed
- Nord J Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;69(1):57-66 - PubMed
- Behav Ther. 2012 Dec;43(4):801-11 - PubMed
- Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 06;7:2003 - PubMed
- Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;206(4):332-8 - PubMed
- Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Sep;163(9):1569-76 - PubMed
- J Occup Rehabil. 2018 Mar;28(1):170-179 - PubMed
- Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1447-62 - PubMed
- Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017 Sep 1;43(5):436-446 - PubMed
- J Occup Rehabil. 2012 Sep;22(3):312-21 - PubMed
- Occup Environ Med. 2011 Jun;68(6):400-7 - PubMed
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 30;3:CD011618 - PubMed
- J Occup Environ Med. 2012 Feb;54(2):128-35 - PubMed
- Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014 Nov;40(6):569-81 - PubMed
- Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;51(8):829-840 - PubMed
- BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Feb 18;13:61 - PubMed
- JAMA. 2001 Sep 19;286(11):1325-30 - PubMed
- Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2018 Sep;41(3):169-182 - PubMed
- Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010 May-Jun;32(3):337-40 - PubMed
- JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jan 26;4(1):e8 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jul 09;16(7):e168 - PubMed
- Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1979 Nov;36(12):1381-3 - PubMed
- Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jul;51(1):41-50 - PubMed
- J Adv Nurs. 1995 Oct;22(4):769-78 - PubMed
- Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Jun;66(6):570-7 - PubMed
- Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Sep;163(9):1561-8 - PubMed
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 12;(9):CD004366 - PubMed
- J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Apr;50(4):401-10 - PubMed
- Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;51(11):1525-1537 - PubMed
- Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1967 Dec;6(4):278-96 - PubMed
- J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 15;190:254-263 - PubMed
- Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013 May;24(3):183-9 - PubMed
- BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 12;13:129 - PubMed
- J Affect Disord. 1991 Sep;23(1):35-41 - PubMed
- Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Mar 1;22(3):173-179 - PubMed
- J Occup Health. 2004 Nov;46(6):448-54 - PubMed
- Health Technol Assess. 2005 Sep;9(37):1-104, iii - PubMed
- BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Jan 19;18(1):6 - PubMed
- Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;199(2):132-9 - PubMed
- Psychol Med. 2016 Apr;46(6):1175-88 - PubMed
- Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382-9 - PubMed
- J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Nov;59(11):608-19 - PubMed
- Psychiatr Serv. 2002 May;53(5):585-90 - PubMed
- Occup Environ Med. 2015 Oct;72(10):745-52 - PubMed
- J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Mar;25(1):127-40 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 15;19(6):e213 - PubMed
- Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Nov 1;44(6):631-638 - PubMed
- Med Care. 2004 Dec;42(12):1202-10 - PubMed
- Health Serv Res. 2002 Oct;37(5):1145-58 - PubMed
- J Affect Disord. 2011 Jul;132(1-2):37-47 - PubMed
- J Occup Health Psychol. 2015 Jan;20(1):1-14 - PubMed
- JAMA. 2000 Jan 12;283(2):212-20 - PubMed
- Psychol Med. 1998 May;28(3):693-701 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2197-223 - PubMed
- Depress Anxiety. 2001;13(1):1-10 - PubMed
- Psychother Psychosom. 2017;86(6):341-350 - PubMed
- Psychol Med. 2007 Mar;37(3):351-62 - PubMed
- Clin Rehabil. 2020 Feb;34(2):170-181 - PubMed
- Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Jan;27(1):17-26 - PubMed
- J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2009 Dec;12(4):195-204 - PubMed
- Occup Med (Lond). 2006 Jan;56(1):39-45 - PubMed
- Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016 Feb;26(2):378-389 - PubMed
- J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;76(2):155-62 - PubMed
- PLoS One. 2017 May 8;12(5):e0176513 - PubMed
- Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;197(4):297-304 - PubMed
- BMC Psychol. 2018 May 23;6(1):25 - PubMed
- Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;50(10):1001-13 - PubMed
- Trials. 2013 Dec 24;14:442 - PubMed
- J Occup Rehabil. 2010 Sep;20(3):275-92 - PubMed
- BMC Public Health. 2018 May 22;18(1):599 - PubMed
- Occup Environ Med. 2012 Dec;69(12):870-6 - PubMed
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD006237 - PubMed
- Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;29(1):11-16 - PubMed
- Occup Environ Med. 2013 Apr;70(4):223-30 - PubMed
- BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 5;9(10):e032119 - PubMed
- J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 1;238:317-326 - PubMed
- Psychother Psychosom. 2008;77(6):351-7 - PubMed
- Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Jan;13(1 Pt 2):157-69 - PubMed
- PLoS Clin Trials. 2007 Jun 01;2(6):e26 - PubMed
- Occup Environ Med. 2013 Apr;70(4):252-60 - PubMed
- J Occup Health Psychol. 2012 Apr;17(2):220-34 - PubMed
- Trials. 2017 Dec 2;18(1):578 - PubMed
- Br J Psychiatry. 1964 Sep;110:641-7 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2001 Apr 21;322(7292):989-91 - PubMed
- Schizophr Res. 2019 Jan;203:41-48 - PubMed
- Br J Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;185:55-62 - PubMed
- Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Jul-Aug;37(4):352-9 - PubMed
- Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013 Mar 1;39(2):144-54 - PubMed
- Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Jun;11 Suppl 3:89-95 - PubMed
- J Affect Disord. 2013 Jun;148(2-3):272-7 - PubMed
- J Affect Disord. 2018 Feb;227:406-415 - PubMed
- Hum Psychopharmacol. 2012 Jan;27(1):47-56 - PubMed
- Occup Environ Med. 2018 Jan;75(1):52-58 - PubMed
- J Affect Disord. 2015 Oct 1;185:180-7 - PubMed
- Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(2):155-67 - PubMed
- J Affect Disord. 2014 Sep;166:307-14 - PubMed
- Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(11):969-81 - PubMed
- Community Ment Health J. 1998 Feb;34(1):71-82 - PubMed
- Am J Ind Med. 2006 May;49(5):394-401 - PubMed
- J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Jul-Aug;66-67:84-94 - PubMed
- Psychother Psychosom. 2020;89(2):90-105 - PubMed
- Occup Environ Med. 2017 Oct;74(10):717-725 - PubMed
- PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35330 - PubMed
- J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;66(10):1312-20 - PubMed
- Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jul;51(2):243-9 - PubMed
- J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;70(6):790-800 - PubMed
- J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Sep;27(3):456-466 - PubMed
- Aust Occup Ther J. 2013 Apr;60(2):85-92 - PubMed
- J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2015 Dec;18(4):175-83 - PubMed
- Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Jan;52(1):1-10 - PubMed
- Eur J Public Health. 2007 Apr;17(2):214-20 - PubMed
- BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 8;9(4):e025138 - PubMed
- BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Feb 09;19(1):28 - PubMed
- PLoS One. 2013 Jul 29;8(7):e69637 - PubMed
- Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2015 Aug;65(8):321-6 - PubMed
- Psychol Med. 2014 Mar;44(4):741-52 - PubMed
- Br J Psychiatry. 2000 May;176:421-8 - PubMed
- JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e200075 - PubMed
- Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017 Jun;35(2):126-136 - PubMed
- Occup Environ Med. 2014 Jan;71(1):21-9 - PubMed
- Occup Med (Lond). 2002 Dec;52(8):485-90 - PubMed
- Med J Aust. 2014 Oct 6;201(7):417-9 - PubMed
- J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Feb;24(1):198-212 - PubMed
- Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001 Nov;16(6):317-24 - PubMed
- CNS Drugs. 2016 May;30(5):405-17 - PubMed
- Evid Based Ment Health. 2009 Nov;12(4):109 - PubMed
- BMC Psychiatry. 2013 May 24;13:147 - PubMed
- J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2002 Sep;5(3):115-20 - PubMed
- BMC Public Health. 2013 Mar 06;13:193 - PubMed
- Pharmacotherapy. 2003 Sep;23(9):1175-85 - PubMed
- JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 1;73(6):639-40 - PubMed
- PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48316 - PubMed
- Br J Psychiatry. 1985 Sep;147:246-9 - PubMed
- J R Soc Med. 1987 Nov;80(11):689-91 - PubMed
- BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 06;16:131 - PubMed
- J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 01;207:212-220 - PubMed
- Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 May;19(3):125-34 - PubMed
- J Occup Rehabil. 2020 Mar;30(1):22-39 - PubMed
- Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2000 May-Jun;22(3):153-62 - PubMed
- JAMA. 2001 Dec 19;286(23):2947-55 - PubMed
- Psychopharmacol Bull. 1997;33(1):13-6 - PubMed
- BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 26;18(1):312 - PubMed
- Work. 2012;43(2):203-10 - PubMed
- Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Mar;22(2):107-15 - PubMed
- Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;68(1):33-41 - PubMed
- Nord J Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;67(1):59-68 - PubMed
- BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014 Mar 11;14:95 - PubMed
- Psychother Psychosom. 2006;75(3):177-82 - PubMed
Substances
MeSH terms
Publication Types