Display options
Share it on

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 24;6:CD001903. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001903.pub5.

Ketogenic diets for drug-resistant epilepsy.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews

Kirsty J Martin-McGill, Rebecca Bresnahan, Robert G Levy, Paul N Cooper

Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  2. Department of Clinical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Chester, Chester, UK.
  3. The Croft Shifta Health Centre, Rochdale, UK.
  4. Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Hospitals NHS Trust, Salford, UK.

PMID: 32588435 PMCID: PMC7387249 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001903.pub5

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ketogenic diets (KDs) are high in fat and low in carbohydrates and have been suggested to reduce seizure frequency in people with epilepsy. Such diets may be beneficial for children with drug-resistant epilepsy. This is an update of a review first published in 2003, and last updated in 2018.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of ketogenic diets for people with drug-resistant epilepsy.

SEARCH METHODS: For this update, we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web) and MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to 26 April 2019) on 29 April 2019. The Cochrane Register of Studies includes the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We imposed no language restrictions. We checked the reference lists of retrieved studies for additional relevant studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs or quasi-RCTs of KDs for people of any age with drug-resistant epilepsy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently applied predefined criteria to extract data and evaluated study quality. We assessed the outcomes: seizure freedom, seizure reduction (50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency), adverse effects, cognition and behaviour, quality of life, and attrition rate. We incorporated a meta-analysis. We utilised an intention-to-treat (ITT) population for all primary analyses. We presented the results as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS: We identified 13 studies with 932 participants; 711 children (4 months to 18 years) and 221 adults (16 years and over). We assessed all 13 studies to be at high risk of performance and detection bias, due to lack of blinding. Assessments varied from low to high risk of bias for all other domains. We rated the evidence for all outcomes as low to very low certainty. Ketogenic diets versus usual care for children Seizure freedom (RR 3.16, 95% CI 1.20 to 8.35; P = 0.02; 4 studies, 385 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and seizure reduction (RR 5.80, 95% CI 3.48 to 9.65; P < 0.001; 4 studies, 385 participants; low-certainty evidence) favoured KDs (including: classic KD, medium-chain triglyceride (MCT) KD combined, MCT KD only, simplified modified Atkins diet (MAD) compared to usual care for children. We are not confident that these estimated effects are accurate. The most commonly reported adverse effects were vomiting, constipation and diarrhoea for both the intervention and usual care group, but the true effect could be substantially different (low-certainty evidence). Ketogenic diet versus usual care for adults In adults, no participants experienced seizure freedom. Seizure reduction favoured KDs (MAD only) over usual care but, again, we are not confident that the effect estimated is accurate (RR 5.03, 95% CI 0.26 to 97.68; P = 0.29; 2 studies, 141 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Adults receiving MAD most commonly reported vomiting, constipation and diarrhoea (very low-certainty evidence). One study reported a reduction in body mass index (BMI) plus increased cholesterol in the MAD group. The other reported weight loss. The true effect could be substantially different to that reported. Ketogenic diet versus ketogenic diet for children Up to 55% of children achieved seizure freedom with a classical 4:1 KD after three months whilst up to 85% of children achieved seizure reduction (very low-certainty evidence). One trial reported a greater incidence of seizure reduction with gradual-onset KD, as opposed to fasting-onset KD. Up to 25% of children were seizure free with MAD and up to 60% achieved seizure reduction. Up to 25% of children became seizure free with MAD and up to 60% experienced seizure reduction. One study used a simplified MAD (sMAD) and reported that 15% of children gained seizure freedom rates and 56% achieved seizure reduction. We judged all the evidence described as very low certainty, thus we are very unsure whether the results are accurate. The most commonly reported adverse effects were vomiting, constipation and diarrhoea (5 studies, very low-certainty evidence). Two studies reported weight loss. One stated that weight loss and gastrointestinal disturbances were more frequent, with 4:1 versus 3:1 KD, whilst one reported no difference in weight loss with 20 mg/d versus 10 mg/d carbohydrates. In one study, there was a higher incidence of hypercalcuria amongst children receiving classic KD compared to MAD. All effects described are unlikely to be accurate. Ketogenic diet versus ketogenic diet for adults One study randomised 80 adults (aged 18 years and over) to either MAD plus KetoCal during the first month with MAD alone for the second month, or MAD alone for the first month followed by MAD plus KetoCal for the second month. No adults achieved seizure freedom. More adults achieved seizure reduction at one month with MAD alone (42.5%) compared to MAD plus KetoCal (32.5%), however, by three months only 10% of adults in both groups maintained seizure reduction. The evidence for both outcomes was of very low certainty; we are very uncertain whether the effects are accurate. Constipation was more frequently reported in the MAD plus KetoCal group (17.5%) compared to the MAD only group (5%) (1 study, very low-certainty evidence). Diarrhoea and increase/change in seizure pattern/semiology were also commonly reported (17.5% to 20% of participants). The true effects of the diets could be substantially different to that reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that KDs could demonstrate effectiveness in children with drug-resistant epilepsy, however, the evidence for the use of KDs in adults remains uncertain. We identified a limited number of studies which all had small sample sizes. Due to the associated risk of bias and imprecision caused by small study populations, the evidence for the use of KDs was of low to very low certainty. More palatable but related diets, such as the MAD, may have a similar effect on seizure control as the classical KD, but could be associated with fewer adverse effects. This assumption requires more investigation. For people who have drug-resistant epilepsy or who are unsuitable for surgical intervention, KDs remain a valid option. Further research is required, particularly for adults with drug-resistant epilepsy.

Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

References

  1. Epilepsia. 2007 Apr;48(4):801-5 - PubMed
  2. J Child Neurol. 2009 Apr;24(4):509-12 - PubMed
  3. Epilepsy Res. 2016 Nov;127:152-159 - PubMed
  4. Epilepsia. 2005 Nov;46(11):1810-9 - PubMed
  5. Epilepsia. 2009 Feb;50(2):322-5 - PubMed
  6. Epilepsy Res. 2011 Sep;96(1-2):96-100 - PubMed
  7. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2004 Jun;160 Spec No 1:5S376-93 - PubMed
  8. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Sep;153(9):946-9 - PubMed
  9. Epilepsy Res. 2002 Jun;50(1-2):21-32 - PubMed
  10. Pediatr Neurol. 2002 Apr;26(4):288-92 - PubMed
  11. Neurology. 2004 Nov 9;63(9):1565-70 - PubMed
  12. Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Jul;60:153-157 - PubMed
  13. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;(3):CD001903 - PubMed
  14. Epilepsia. 2011 Apr;52(4):781-7 - PubMed
  15. Pediatr Neurol. 2014 Jan;50(1):101-3 - PubMed
  16. Epilepsia. 2005 Feb;46(2):272-9 - PubMed
  17. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 09;2:CD001903 - PubMed
  18. Epilepsia. 2008 Feb;49(2):316-9 - PubMed
  19. Seizure. 2009 Jan;18(1):30-3 - PubMed
  20. Epilepsia. 2009 May;50(5):1109-17 - PubMed
  21. Epilepsy Res. 2002 Feb;48(3):221-7 - PubMed
  22. Epilepsia. 2005 Oct;46(10):1684-6 - PubMed
  23. Epilepsia. 2011 Apr;52(4):775-80 - PubMed
  24. Epilepsia. 2018 Aug;59(8):1567-1576 - PubMed
  25. Lancet. 1999 Mar 13;353(9156):888-93 - PubMed
  26. Epilepsia. 2007 Jan;48(1):43-58 - PubMed
  27. Expert Rev Neurother. 2009 Dec;9(12):1791-802 - PubMed
  28. Acta Neurol Scand. 2013 Dec;128(6):402-8 - PubMed
  29. N Engl J Med. 2003 Sep 25;349(13):1257-66 - PubMed
  30. Epilepsy Res. 2017 May;132:91-99 - PubMed
  31. Epilepsia. 2016 Jan;57(1):51-8 - PubMed
  32. Epilepsia. 2016 Jan;57(1):41-50 - PubMed
  33. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Jun;7(6):500-6 - PubMed
  34. Seizure. 2018 Aug;60:132-138 - PubMed
  35. BMC Neurol. 2011 Jan 25;11:10 - PubMed
  36. Trials. 2017 Apr 26;18(1):195 - PubMed
  37. Iran J Neurol. 2017 Apr 4;16(2):72-77 - PubMed
  38. Pediatrics. 2001 Oct;108(4):898-905 - PubMed
  39. BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2535 - PubMed
  40. Epilepsia. 2013 Mar;54(3):481-6 - PubMed
  41. BMJ. 2010 Feb 15;340:c365 - PubMed
  42. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD001903 - PubMed
  43. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 07;11:CD001903 - PubMed
  44. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017 Feb;135(2):231-239 - PubMed
  45. Pediatr Neurol. 2005 Feb;32(2):81-3 - PubMed
  46. Epilepsy Behav. 2007 May;10(3):432-6 - PubMed
  47. Neurology. 1971 Nov;21(11):1097-103 - PubMed

Substances

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support