Display options
Cite
Hoff P. Nosologische Grundpostulate bei Kraepelin. Versuch einer kritischen Würdigung des Kraepelinschen Spätwerkes. [Kraepelin's basic nosologic postulates. An attempt at a critical evaluation of the later works of Kraepelin]. Z Klin Psychol Psychopathol Psychother. 1988;36(4):328-36
Hoff, P. (1988). Nosologische Grundpostulate bei Kraepelin. Versuch einer kritischen Würdigung des Kraepelinschen Spätwerkes. [Kraepelin's basic nosologic postulates. An attempt at a critical evaluation of the later works of Kraepelin]. Zeitschrift fur klinische Psychologie, Psychopathologie und Psychotherapie, 36(4), 328-36.
Hoff, P. "Nosologische Grundpostulate bei Kraepelin. Versuch einer kritischen Würdigung des Kraepelinschen Spätwerkes." [Kraepelin's basic nosologic postulates. An attempt at a critical evaluation of the later works of Kraepelin]. Zeitschrift fur klinische Psychologie, Psychopathologie und Psychotherapie vol. 36,4 (1988): 328-36.
Hoff P. Nosologische Grundpostulate bei Kraepelin. Versuch einer kritischen Würdigung des Kraepelinschen Spätwerkes. [Kraepelin's basic nosologic postulates. An attempt at a critical evaluation of the later works of Kraepelin]. Z Klin Psychol Psychopathol Psychother. 1988;36(4):328-36. German. PMID: 3073607.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Z Klin Psychol Psychopathol Psychother. 1988;36(4):328-36.

[Kraepelin's basic nosologic postulates. An attempt at a critical evaluation of the later works of Kraepelin].

Zeitschrift fur klinische Psychologie, Psychopathologie und Psychotherapie

[Article in German]
P Hoff

Affiliations

  1. Psychiatrische Klinik der Universität, München, FRG.

PMID: 3073607

Abstract

This study discusses three important papers by Emil Kraepelin, published between 1918 and 1920. Kraepelin supports--in accordance with his teacher Wilhelm Wundt--the view of psychophysical parallelism as a basic principle of dealing with the questions of mental illness. Kraepelin is often called a nosologist; but one must not forget that Kraepelins nosology was not a static one, nor did he vote in favor of any kind of dogmatism. Only when Kraepelin's basic positions are reflected in a differentiated way, his enormous influence on very different parts of psychiatry as science can be understood.

Similar articles

Show all 42 similar articles

MeSH terms

Publication Types

LinkOut - more resources