Display options
Cite
Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi S, Zomahoun HTV, Légaré F. Patient Engagement and its Evaluation Tools- Current Challenges and Future Directions Comment on "Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review". Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(6):378-380doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.16.
Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi, S., Zomahoun, H. T. V., & Légaré, F. (2019). Patient Engagement and its Evaluation Tools- Current Challenges and Future Directions Comment on "Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review". International journal of health policy and management, 8(6), 378-380. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2019.16
Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi, Samira, et al. "Patient Engagement and its Evaluation Tools- Current Challenges and Future Directions Comment on "Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review"." International journal of health policy and management vol. 8,6 (2019): 378-380. doi: https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2019.16
Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi S, Zomahoun HTV, Légaré F. Patient Engagement and its Evaluation Tools- Current Challenges and Future Directions Comment on "Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review". Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Jun 01;8(6):378-380. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.16. PMID: 31256570; PMCID: PMC6600020.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Jun 01;8(6):378-380. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.16.

Patient Engagement and its Evaluation Tools- Current Challenges and Future Directions Comment on "Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review".

International journal of health policy and management

Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi, Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun, France Légaré

Affiliations

  1. Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  2. Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation Component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
  3. Université Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
  4. Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
  5. Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, QC, Canada.

PMID: 31256570 PMCID: PMC6600020 DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.16

Abstract

Considering the growing recognition of the importance of patient engagement in healthcare decisions, research and delivery systems, it is important to ensure high quality and efficient patient engagement evaluation tools. In this commentary, we will first highlight the definition and importance of patient engagement. Then we discuss the psychometric properties of the patient engagement evaluation tools identified in a recent review on patient engagement in healthcare organization- and system-level decision-making. Lastly, we suggest future directions for patient engagement and its evaluation tools.

© 2019 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Evaluation Tools; Patient Engagement; Systematic Reviews; Technology

References

  1. Health Policy. 2009 Aug;91(3):219-28 - PubMed
  2. J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(1):27-36 - PubMed
  3. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42 - PubMed
  4. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Sep 26;7:86 - PubMed
  5. Soc Sci Med. 1988;26(9):931-40 - PubMed
  6. Sante Publique. 2015 Mar-Apr;1 Suppl:41-50 - PubMed
  7. BMJ. 2007 Jul 7;335(7609):24-7 - PubMed
  8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89 - PubMed
  9. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1998 Winter;44(4):295-310 - PubMed
  10. Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):539-49 - PubMed
  11. Med Care Res Rev. 2015 Oct;72(5):580-604 - PubMed
  12. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 May 16;7(10):889-903 - PubMed
  13. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):737-45 - PubMed
  14. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):223-31 - PubMed
  15. Trials. 2016 Sep 13;17(1):449 - PubMed
  16. J Interprof Care. 2001 Nov;15(4):351-68 - PubMed
  17. Healthc Financ Manage. 2008 Mar;62(3):80-5 - PubMed
  18. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2007 Mar;53(2):148-58 - PubMed
  19. Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1075-1084 - PubMed
  20. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(5):403-8 - PubMed
  21. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2002 Feb;27(1):49-91 - PubMed
  22. Health Expect. 2005 Mar;8(1):64-73 - PubMed
  23. J Health Soc Behav. 1973 Dec;14(4):368-74 - PubMed
  24. Int J Health Plann Manage. 1996 Oct-Dec;11(4):345-58 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types