Display options
Share it on

J Int Adv Otol. 2019 Apr;15(1):151-155. doi: 10.5152/iao.2019.6800.

A Review of Surgical Nuances and Outcomes of the Reverse Stapedotomy.

The journal of international advanced otology

Anup Singh, David Victor Kumar Irugu, Rajeev Kumar, Hitesh Verma

Affiliations

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medanta -The Medicity, Haryana, India.
  2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

PMID: 30924781 PMCID: PMC6483427 DOI: 10.5152/iao.2019.6800

Abstract

The stapes surgery has evolved through different eras of technical and technological development. The current standard of care is creating a stapedotomy with piston placement, and both these aspects have multiple variations and show well-established technological advances. The conventional technique has been fairly standardized,and it offers gratifying results to both the surgeon and the patient. To overcome certain procedural risks and potential complications, the reversal of steps technique was developed and streamlined by Ugo Fisch in the early 1980s. Since its beginning, the technique has been adopted by various centers, and surgical outcomes have been demonstrated to be at par with the conventional technique, with a reduced risk of complications. The aim of the present review is to detail the various surgical nuances and outcomes of this particular technique in a comprehensive narrative manner.

References

  1. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2003;124(4):255-8 - PubMed
  2. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011 Jun;120(6):363-71 - PubMed
  3. Am J Otol. 1993 Mar;14(2):118-21 - PubMed
  4. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2018 Apr;51(2):275-290 - PubMed
  5. Am J Otol. 1991 Jan;12(1):16-9 - PubMed
  6. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 May;271(5):981-6 - PubMed
  7. Acta Chir Iugosl. 2009;56(3):23-7 - PubMed
  8. Otol Neurotol. 2008 Jan;29(1):8-12 - PubMed
  9. Otol Neurotol. 2017 Aug;38(7):931-937 - PubMed
  10. Otol Neurotol. 2013 Dec;34(9):1576-80 - PubMed
  11. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994 Sep;111(3 Pt 1):181-8 - PubMed
  12. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001 Mar;124(3):279-81 - PubMed
  13. Laryngoscope. 1984 Jul;94(7):912-5 - PubMed
  14. Audiol Neurootol. 2007;12(4):221-5 - PubMed
  15. Otol Neurotol. 2011 Dec;32(9):1415-21 - PubMed
  16. Clin Otolaryngol. 2008 Aug;33(4):359-62 - PubMed
  17. Otol Neurotol. 2008 Oct;29(7):889-92 - PubMed
  18. Otolaryngol Pol. 2001;55(6):593-7 - PubMed
  19. Acta Otolaryngol. 1997 Jan;117(1):94-9 - PubMed
  20. Otol Neurotol. 2007 Feb;28(2):152-6 - PubMed
  21. Laryngoscope. 2002 Nov;112(11):2046-50 - PubMed
  22. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 1999 Apr;116(1):28-36 - PubMed
  23. Laryngoscope. 1981 Aug;91(8):1308-21 - PubMed
  24. Am J Otol. 1995 Jul;16(4):486-97 - PubMed
  25. Otol Neurotol. 2012 Apr;33(3):490-1; author reply 491 - PubMed
  26. Otol Neurotol. 2009 Dec;30(8):1128-30 - PubMed
  27. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1978 May-Jun;87(3 Pt 2 Suppl 49):3-36 - PubMed
  28. J Laryngol Otol. 1987 Jun;101(6):542-7 - PubMed
  29. Am J Otol. 1982 Oct;4(2):112-7 - PubMed
  30. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1981 Nov-Dec;90(6 Pt 1):633-6 - PubMed
  31. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004 Dec;29(6):571-3 - PubMed
  32. Laryngoscope. 2016 Jan;126(1):182-90 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types