Display options
Share it on

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 31;7:CD004822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004822.pub3.

Antibiotics for prolonged wet cough in children.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews

Julie M Marchant, Helen L Petsky, Peter S Morris, Anne B Chang

Affiliations

  1. Cough, Asthma, Airways Research Group, Centre for Children's Health Research, South Brisbane, Australia.

PMID: 30062732 PMCID: PMC6513288 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004822.pub3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cough is a frequent symptom presenting to doctors. The most common cause of childhood chronic (greater than fours weeks' duration) wet cough is protracted bacterial bronchitis (PBB) in some settings, although other more serious causes can also present this way. Timely and effective management of chronic wet or productive cough improves quality of life and clinical outcomes. Current international guidelines suggest a course of antibiotics is the first treatment of choice in the absence of signs or symptoms specific to an alternative diagnosis. This review sought to clarify the current evidence to support this recommendation.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of antibiotics in treating children with prolonged wet cough (excluding children with bronchiectasis or other known underlying respiratory illness) and to assess risk of harm due to adverse events.

SEARCH METHODS: We undertook an updated search (from 2008 onwards) using the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, trials registries, review articles and reference lists of relevant articles. The latest searches were performed in September 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antibiotics with a placebo or a control group in children with chronic wet cough. We excluded cluster and cross-over trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methods as recommended by Cochrane. We reviewed results of searches against predetermined criteria for inclusion. Two independent review authors selected, extracted and assessed the data for inclusion. We contacted authors of eligible studies for further information as needed. We analysed data as 'intention to treat.'

MAIN RESULTS: We identified three studies as eligible for inclusion in the review. Two were in the previous review and one new study was included. We considered the older studies to be at high or unclear risk of bias whereas we judged the newly included study at low risk of bias. The studies varied in treatment duration (from 7 to 14 days) and the antibiotic used (two studies used amoxicillin/clavulanate acid and one used erythromycin).We included 190 children (171 completed), mean ages ranged from 21 months to six years, in the meta-analyses. Analysis of all three trials (190 children) found that treatment with antibiotics reduced the proportion of children not cured at follow-up (primary outcome measure) (odds ratio (OR) 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 0.31, using intention-to -treat analysis), which translated to a number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) of 3 (95% CI 2 to 4). We identified no significant heterogeneity (for both fixed-effect and random-effects model the I² statistic was 0%). Two older trials assessed progression of illness, defined by requirement for further antibiotics (125 children), which was significantly lower in the antibiotic group (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.34; NNTB 4, 95% CI 3 to 5). All three trials (190 children) reported adverse events, which were not significantly increased in the antibiotic group compared to the control group (OR 1.88, 95% CI 0.62 to 5.69). We assessed the quality of evidence GRADE rating as moderate for all outcome measures, except adverse events which we assessed as low quality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests antibiotics are efficacious for the treatment of children with chronic wet cough (greater than four weeks) with an NNTB of three. However, antibiotics have adverse effects and this review reported only uncertainty as to the risk of increased adverse effects when they were used in this setting. The inclusion of a more robust study strengthened the previous Cochrane review and its results.

References

  1. Chest. 2014 Jun;145(6):1271-1278 - PubMed
  2. Chest. 2016 Nov;150(5):1101-1108 - PubMed
  3. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2008 Jun;43(6):519-31 - PubMed
  4. Br Med J. 1977 Aug 27;2(6086):552-4 - PubMed
  5. Chest. 2011 Aug;140(2):317-323 - PubMed
  6. Med J Aust. 2010 Mar 1;192(5):265-71 - PubMed
  7. J Asthma. 2001 Jun;38(4):299-309 - PubMed
  8. Pediatrics. 2013 May;131(5):e1576-83 - PubMed
  9. Pediatrics. 1986 Jun;77(6):795-800 - PubMed
  10. Arch Dis Child. 1984 Nov;59(11):1038-45 - PubMed
  11. Helv Paediatr Acta. 1986 May;41(1-2):7-17 - PubMed
  12. Chest. 2015 Mar;147(3):745-753 - PubMed
  13. Chest. 2012 Oct;142(4):943-950 - PubMed
  14. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2015 Aug 07;10(1):25 - PubMed
  15. Eur J Pediatr. 2016 Aug;175(8):1077-84 - PubMed
  16. Respir Res. 2005 Jan 08;6:3 - PubMed
  17. Chest. 2016 Jan;149(1):120-42 - PubMed
  18. Br Med J. 1966 Jan 8;1(5479):83-5 - PubMed
  19. Indian J Pediatr. 1985 Jul-Aug;52(417):343-8 - PubMed
  20. Eur J Radiol. 2003 Sep;47(3):215-20 - PubMed
  21. Br Med J. 1976 Sep 4;2(6035):556-9 - PubMed
  22. Clin Respir J. 2014 Jul;8(3):330-7 - PubMed
  23. Thorax. 2007 Jan;62(1):80-4 - PubMed
  24. Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 04;5:13731 - PubMed
  25. Indian J Med Res. 2004 Nov;120(5):489-94 - PubMed
  26. J Int Med Res. 1988 Jan-Feb;16(1):31-8 - PubMed
  27. Chest. 2008 Dec;134(6):1122-1128 - PubMed
  28. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD000247 - PubMed
  29. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 Mar;141(3):640-7 - PubMed
  30. Scand J Infect Dis. 1993;25(3):323-9 - PubMed
  31. Chest. 2008 Aug;134(2):303-309 - PubMed
  32. Br J Gen Pract. 2002 May;52(478):401-9 - PubMed
  33. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD004822 - PubMed
  34. Chest. 2006 Jan;129(1 Suppl):260S-283S - PubMed
  35. Eur Respir J. 2012 Feb;39(2):392-5 - PubMed
  36. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016 Mar;51(3):225-42 - PubMed
  37. Am Fam Physician. 1998 Oct 15;58(6):1335-42, 1345 - PubMed
  38. Pediatrics. 2012 Feb;129(2):e364-9 - PubMed
  39. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999 Jun;74(6):613-34 - PubMed
  40. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 May;135(5):1179-85.e1-4 - PubMed
  41. Yonsei Med J. 1983;24(1):67-75 - PubMed
  42. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006 Sep;41(9):887-92 - PubMed
  43. Thorax. 2008 Apr;63 Suppl 3:iii1-iii15 - PubMed
  44. Chest. 2006 May;129(5):1132-41 - PubMed
  45. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016 May;51(5):450-69 - PubMed
  46. Chest. 2017 Apr;151(4):884-890 - PubMed
  47. Eur J Respir Dis Suppl. 1986;147:6-15 - PubMed
  48. J Pediatr. 2012 Jan;160(1):88-92 - PubMed
  49. Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4):885-889 - PubMed
  50. Arch Dis Child. 2015 Jan;100(1):112 - PubMed
  51. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD000245 - PubMed
  52. Thorax. 2012 Aug;67(8):689-93 - PubMed
  53. Orv Hetil. 1980 Dec 21;121(51):3125-30 - PubMed
  54. Chest. 2016 Jan;149(1):106-19 - PubMed
  55. Ital J Pediatr. 2015 Oct 06;41:73 - PubMed
  56. Scand J Infect Dis. 1994;26(5):545-51 - PubMed
  57. Eur Respir J. 1998 Feb;11(2):462-6 - PubMed
  58. Chest. 1998 Aug;114(2 Suppl Managing):133S-181S - PubMed

Substances

MeSH terms

Publication Types