Display options
Cite
Sajobi TT, Brahmbatt R, Lix LM, et al. Scoping review of response shift methods: current reporting practices and recommendations. Qual Life Res. 2017;27(5):1133-1146doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1751-x.
Sajobi, T. T., Brahmbatt, R., Lix, L. M., Zumbo, B. D., & Sawatzky, R. (2018). Scoping review of response shift methods: current reporting practices and recommendations. Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 27(5), 1133-1146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1751-x
Sajobi, Tolulope T, et al. "Scoping review of response shift methods: current reporting practices and recommendations." Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation vol. 27,5 (2018): 1133-1146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1751-x
Sajobi TT, Brahmbatt R, Lix LM, Zumbo BD, Sawatzky R. Scoping review of response shift methods: current reporting practices and recommendations. Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1133-1146. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1751-x. Epub 2017 Dec 05. PMID: 29210014.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1133-1146. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1751-x. Epub 2017 Dec 05.

Scoping review of response shift methods: current reporting practices and recommendations.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation

Tolulope T Sajobi, Ronak Brahmbatt, Lisa M Lix, Bruno D Zumbo, Richard Sawatzky

Affiliations

  1. Department of Community Health Sciences & O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada. [email protected].
  2. School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, Canada.
  3. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
  4. Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, and Special Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  5. Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, Canada.

PMID: 29210014 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1751-x

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Response shift (RS) has been defined as a change in the meaning of an individual's self-evaluation of his/her health status and quality of life. Several statistical model- and design-based methods have been developed to test for RS in longitudinal data. We reviewed the uptake of these methods in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) literature.

METHODS: CINHAHL, EMBASE, Medline, ProQuest, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were searched to identify English-language articles about RS published until 2016. Data on year and country of publication, PRO measure adopted, RS detection method, type of RS detected, and testing of underlying model assumptions were extracted from the included articles.

RESULTS: Of the 1032 articles identified, 101 (9.8%) articles were included in the study. While 54.5 of the articles reported on the Then-test, 30.7% of the articles reported on Oort's or Schmitt's structural equation modeling (SEM) procedure. Newer RS detection methods, such as relative importance analysis and random forest regression, have been used less frequently. Less than 25% reported on testing the assumptions underlying the adopted RS detection method(s).

CONCLUSIONS: Despite rapid methodological advancements in RS research, this review highlights the need for further research about RS detection methods for complex longitudinal data and standardized reporting guidelines.

Keywords: Patient-reported outcomes; Response shift; Systematic review

References

  1. Qual Life Res. 2006 Apr;15(3):349-56 - PubMed
  2. Qual Life Res. 2005 Apr;14(3):629-39 - PubMed
  3. Qual Life Res. 2016 Jul;25(7):1751-60 - PubMed
  4. Qual Life Res. 2005 Dec;14(10):2247-57 - PubMed
  5. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Aug;17(8):1009-13 - PubMed
  6. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 May 06;13:52 - PubMed
  7. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Nov;62(11):1138-47 - PubMed
  8. Qual Life Res. 2015 Mar;24(3):529-40 - PubMed
  9. Qual Life Res. 2014 Nov;23(9):2421-30 - PubMed
  10. Qual Life Res. 2006 Nov;15(9):1533-50 - PubMed
  11. Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10 ):1727-36 - PubMed
  12. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Sep;91(9 Suppl):S38-43 - PubMed
  13. Qual Life Res. 2015 Mar;24(3):553-64 - PubMed
  14. Qual Life Res. 2004 Sep;13(7):1177-85 - PubMed
  15. Multivariate Behav Res. 1982 Jul 1;17(3):343-58 - PubMed
  16. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Feb 15;13:20 - PubMed
  17. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Mar 08;12:32 - PubMed
  18. Qual Life Res. 2016 Jun;25(6):1385-93 - PubMed
  19. Qual Life Res. 2016 Jun;25(6):1361-83 - PubMed
  20. Qual Life Res. 2008 May;17(4):627-39 - PubMed
  21. Qual Life Res. 2005 Apr;14(3):587-98 - PubMed
  22. Psychol Health. 2011 Nov;26(11):1414-28 - PubMed
  23. Qual Life Res. 2015 Mar;24(3):521-8 - PubMed
  24. J Fam Pract. 1989 Oct;29(4):377-80 - PubMed
  25. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(9):981-7 - PubMed
  26. Qual Life Res. 2003 May;12(3):219-27 - PubMed
  27. Epilepsia. 2014 Sep;55(9):1331-8 - PubMed
  28. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Apr;88(4):529-36 - PubMed
  29. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 May;85:37-44 - PubMed
  30. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9 - PubMed
  31. Qual Life Res. 1993 Dec;2(6):367-8 - PubMed
  32. Qual Life Res. 2013 May;22(4):695-703 - PubMed
  33. Qual Life Res. 2013 Dec;22(10):2663-73 - PubMed
  34. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Jun;48(11):1531-48 - PubMed
  35. Qual Life Res. 2015 Mar;24(3):541-51 - PubMed
  36. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Mar 15;2:14 - PubMed
  37. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 1;152(11):726-32 - PubMed
  38. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Jun;48(11):1507-15 - PubMed
  39. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Nov;58(11):1125-33 - PubMed
  40. Qual Life Res. 2005 Apr;14(3):599-609 - PubMed
  41. Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Oct;2(4):137-44 - PubMed
  42. Qual Life Res. 2015 Aug;24(8):1799-807 - PubMed
  43. Qual Life Res. 2016 Jun;25(6):1323-5 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support