Display options
Share it on

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Oct 23;5(10):e124. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8137.

Designing a Self-Management App for Young People With Type 1 Diabetes: Methodological Challenges, Experiences, and Recommendations.

JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Pernille Castensøe-Seidenfaden, Gitte Reventlov Husted, Grete Teilmann, Eva Hommel, Birthe Susanne Olsen, Finn Kensing

Affiliations

  1. Pediatric and Adolescent Department, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, University of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark.
  2. Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark.
  3. Pediatric and Adolescent Department, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
  4. Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

PMID: 29061552 PMCID: PMC5673883 DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.8137

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Young people with type 1 diabetes often struggle to self-manage their disease. Mobile health (mHealth) apps show promise in supporting self-management of chronic conditions such as type 1 diabetes. Many health care providers become involved in app development. Unfortunately, limited information is available to guide their selection of appropriate methods, techniques, and tools for a participatory design (PD) project in health care.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to develop an mHealth app to support young people in self-managing type 1 diabetes. This paper presents our methodological recommendations based on experiences and reflections from a 2-year research study.

METHODS: A mixed methods design was used to identify user needs before designing the app and testing it in a randomized controlled trial. App design was based on qualitative, explorative, interventional, and experimental activities within an overall iterative PD approach. Several techniques and tools were used, including workshops, a mail panel, think-aloud tests, and a feasibility study.

RESULTS: The final mHealth solution was "Young with Diabetes" (YWD). The iterative PD approach supported researchers and designers in understanding the needs of end users (ie, young people, parents, and health care providers) and their assessment of YWD, as well as how to improve app usability and feasibility. It is critical to include all end user groups during all phases of a PD project and to establish a multidisciplinary team to provide the wide range of expertise required to build a usable and useful mHealth app.

CONCLUSIONS: Future research is needed to develop and evaluate more efficient PD techniques. Health care providers need guidance on what tools and techniques to choose for which subgroups of users and guidance on how to introduce an app to colleagues to successfully implement an mHealth app in health care organizations. These steps are important for anyone who wants to design an mHealth app for any illness.

©Pernille Castensøe-Seidenfaden, Gitte Reventlov Husted, Grete Teilmann, Eva Hommel, Birthe Susanne Olsen, Finn Kensing. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 23.10.2017.

Keywords: adolescents; chronic condition; diabetes; feasibility; mHealth; methodological recommendations; participatory design; self-management; transition; usability

References

  1. Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124(6):e1134-41 - PubMed
  2. Health Psychol. 2004 Sep;23(5):443-51 - PubMed
  3. Diabet Med. 2010 Jan;27(1):72-8 - PubMed
  4. BMJ. 2011 Oct 17;343:d6054 - PubMed
  5. Inform Prim Care. 2005;13(2):97-104 - PubMed
  6. Diabetes Care. 1995 Jun;18(6):754-60 - PubMed
  7. Nurs Res. 2011 Sep-Oct;60(5):340-7 - PubMed
  8. J Pediatr. 2009 Nov;155(5):668-72.e1-3 - PubMed
  9. J Clin Nurs. 2017 Oct;26(19-20):3018-3030 - PubMed
  10. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;233:95-112 - PubMed
  11. J Med Internet Res. 2012 May 08;14(3):e70 - PubMed
  12. J Healthc Qual. 2008 Mar-Apr;30(2):37-47 - PubMed
  13. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Aug 06;14(4):e111 - PubMed
  14. Diabetes Care. 2003 Apr;26(4):1052-7 - PubMed
  15. J Med Internet Res. 2008 Jun 30;10(2):e20 - PubMed
  16. Telemed J E Health. 2012 Apr;18(3):175-84 - PubMed
  17. Nurs Res. 2009 Jul-Aug;58(4):228-36 - PubMed
  18. BMJ. 2003 Aug 2;327(7409):260-1 - PubMed
  19. Aust Health Rev. 2008 May;32(2):330-8 - PubMed
  20. JMIR Hum Factors. 2015 May 20;2(1):e9 - PubMed
  21. Qual Health Res. 2007 Jan;17 (1):122-30 - PubMed
  22. Clin Transplant. 2009 Aug-Sep;23(4):537-45 - PubMed
  23. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Sep-Oct;13(5):557-66 - PubMed
  24. J Biomed Inform. 2008 Apr;41(2):327-39 - PubMed
  25. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2012 Jan;17(1):33-40 - PubMed
  26. Interact J Med Res. 2013 Apr 16;2(1):e7 - PubMed
  27. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Apr 19;5(4):e53 - PubMed
  28. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 10;19(4):e102 - PubMed
  29. Telemed J E Health. 2008 Nov;14(9):995-7 - PubMed
  30. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 2):1204-8 - PubMed
  31. Diabetes Care. 1998 Oct;21(10):1644-51 - PubMed
  32. Diabet Med. 2017 May;34(5):667-675 - PubMed
  33. Curr Diab Rep. 2014 Oct;14(10):534 - PubMed
  34. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655 - PubMed
  35. J Biomed Inform. 2004 Feb;37(1):56-76 - PubMed
  36. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Nov;29(11):563-74 - PubMed
  37. J Health Psychol. 2016 Feb;21(2):138-51 - PubMed
  38. J Med Internet Res. 2006 Nov 14;8(4):e27 - PubMed
  39. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun;20(e1):e9-e13 - PubMed
  40. J Adolesc Health. 2011 May;48(5):429-40 - PubMed
  41. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Apr 25;4(2):e38 - PubMed
  42. Evid Based Med. 2013 Jun;18(3):90-2 - PubMed
  43. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 23;17(12):e287 - PubMed
  44. J Telemed Telecare. 2017 Oct;23 (9):780-785 - PubMed
  45. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2007 Winter;21(1):87-94 - PubMed
  46. Int J Med Inform. 2014 May;83(5):320-9 - PubMed
  47. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;222:139-51 - PubMed
  48. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 May-Jun;13(3):239-44 - PubMed
  49. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 2001 Oct-Dec;24(4):209-23 - PubMed
  50. Pediatrics. 2006 Jul;118(1):e20-4 - PubMed
  51. Natl Health Stat Report. 2010 Mar 31;(23):1-11 - PubMed
  52. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2006 Oct;19(4):303-10 - PubMed

Publication Types