Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 12;10:CD011170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011170.pub2.
Psychological therapies versus pharmacological interventions for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in adults.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
Hissei Imai, Aran Tajika, Peiyao Chen, Alessandro Pompoli, Toshi A Furukawa
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.
PMID: 27730622
PMCID: PMC6457876 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011170.pub2
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Panic disorder is common and deleterious to mental well-being. Psychological therapies and pharmacological interventions are both used as treatments for panic disorder with and without agoraphobia. However, there are no up-to-date reviews on the comparative efficacy and acceptability of the two treatment modalities, and such a review is necessary for improved treatment planning for this disorder.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and acceptability of psychological therapies versus pharmacological interventions for panic disorder, with or without agoraphobia, in adults.
SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Group Specialised Register on 11 September 2015. This register contains reports of relevant randomised controlled trials from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1950 to present), Embase (1974 to present), and PsycINFO (1967 to present). We cross-checked reference lists of relevant papers and systematic reviews. We did not apply any restrictions on date, language, or publication status.
SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials comparing psychological therapies with pharmacological interventions for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia as diagnosed by operationalised criteria in adults.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and resolved any disagreements in consultation with a third review author. For dichotomous data, we calculated risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We analysed continuous data using standardised mean differences (with 95% CI). We used the random-effects model throughout.
MAIN RESULTS: We included 16 studies with a total of 966 participants in the present review. Eight of the studies were conducted in Europe, four in the USA, two in the Middle East, and one in Southeast Asia.None of the studies reported long-term remission/response (long term being six months or longer from treatment commencement).There was no evidence of a difference between psychological therapies and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in terms of short-term remission (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.17; 6 studies; 334 participants) or short-term response (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.86; 5 studies; 277 participants) (very low-quality evidence), and no evidence of a difference between psychological therapies and SSRIs in treatment acceptability as measured using dropouts for any reason (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.80 to 2.22; 6 studies; 334 participants; low-quality evidence).There was no evidence of a difference between psychological therapies and tricyclic antidepressants in terms of short-term remission (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.09; 3 studies; 229 participants), short-term response (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.10; 4 studies; 270 participants), or dropouts for any reason (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.30; 5 studies; 430 participants) (low-quality evidence).There was no evidence of a difference between psychological therapies and other antidepressants in terms of short-term remission (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.67; 3 studies; 135 participants; very low-quality evidence) and evidence that psychological therapies did not significantly increase or decrease the short-term response over other antidepressants (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.37; 3 studies; 128 participants) or dropouts for any reason (RR 1.55, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.65; 3 studies; 180 participants) (low-quality evidence).There was no evidence of a difference between psychological therapies and benzodiazepines in terms of short-term remission (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.65; 3 studies; 95 participants), short-term response (RR 1.58, 95% CI 0.70 to 3.58; 2 studies; 69 participants), or dropouts for any reason (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.36; 3 studies; 116 participants) (very low-quality evidence).There was no evidence of a difference between psychological therapies and either antidepressant alone or antidepressants plus benzodiazepines in terms of short-term remission (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.05; 11 studies; 663 participants) and short-term response (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.18; 12 studies; 800 participants) (low-quality evidence), and there was no evidence of a difference between psychological therapies and either antidepressants alone or antidepressants plus benzodiazepines in terms of treatment acceptability as measured by dropouts for any reason (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.51; 13 studies; 909 participants; very low-quality evidence). The risk of selection bias and reporting bias was largely unclear. Preplanned subgroup and sensitivity analyses limited to trials with longer-term, quality-controlled, or individual psychological therapies suggested that antidepressants might be more effective than psychological therapies for some outcomes.There were no data to contribute to a comparison between psychological therapies and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and subsequent adverse effects.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence in this review was often imprecise. The superiority of either therapy over the other is uncertain due to the low and very low quality of the evidence with regard to short-term efficacy and treatment acceptability, and no data were available regarding adverse effects.The sensitivity analysis and investigation of the sources of heterogeneity indicated three possible influential factors: quality control of psychological therapies, the length of intervention, and the individual modality of psychological therapies.Future studies should examine the long-term effects after intervention or treatment continuation and should provide information on risk of bias, especially with regard to selection and reporting biases.
References
- J Psychosom Res. 1999 Feb;46(2):177-85 - PubMed
- Am J Psychiatry. 1999 May;156(5):675-82 - PubMed
- J Psychother Pract Res. 1999 Summer;8(3):234-42 - PubMed
- J Clin Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;60(12):831-8 - PubMed
- JAMA. 2000 May 17;283(19):2529-36 - PubMed
- Depress Anxiety. 2000;11(3):105-13 - PubMed
- Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2000;403:39-49 - PubMed
- Biol Psychiatry. 2000 Oct 15;48(8):830-43 - PubMed
- Med J Malaysia. 2000 Dec;55(4):402-8 - PubMed
- Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Dec;158(12):1993-8 - PubMed
- Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001;251 Suppl 2:II53-6 - PubMed
- Psychother Psychosom. 2002 Mar-Apr;71(2):85-9 - PubMed
- Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):72-6 - PubMed
- J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002 Apr;70(2):275-87 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2002 Jun 29;359(9325):2253-4 - PubMed
- Depress Anxiety. 2002;16(4):162-71 - PubMed
- J Med Ethics. 2003 Aug;29(4):238-42 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60 - PubMed
- Br J Med Psychol. 1959;32(1):50-5 - PubMed
- J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992 Oct;60(5):664-9; discussion 670-7 - PubMed
- Behav Res Ther. 2003 Dec;41(12):1427-49 - PubMed
- Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;61(1):34-41 - PubMed
- Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Jan-Mar;16(1):41-6 - PubMed
- CMAJ. 1992 Sep 15;147(6):878-83 - PubMed
- Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;161(8):1485-7 - PubMed
- Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2004 Oct;25(5):340-8 - PubMed
- Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005 Jan;20(1):49-52 - PubMed
- Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1992 Mar;85(3):201-6 - PubMed
- Psychol Med. 2004 Nov;34(8):1385-94 - PubMed
- Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83 - PubMed
- J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Jun;73(3):506-14 - PubMed
- J Affect Disord. 2005 Sep;88(1):27-45 - PubMed
- Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2005 Sep;112(3):224-32 - PubMed
- Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;187:352-9 - PubMed
- Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;62(11):1249-57 - PubMed
- Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;14(3):255-63 - PubMed
- Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Apr;63(4):415-24 - PubMed
- J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;67(3):363-74 - PubMed
- Depress Anxiety. 2006;23(5):312-24 - PubMed
- J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Dec;74(6):1173-9 - PubMed
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;(1):CD004364 - PubMed
- Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;164(2):265-72 - PubMed
- Psychother Psychosom. 2007;76(3):154-61 - PubMed
- J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Jun;75(3):374-9 - PubMed
- J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;68(7):1038-44 - PubMed
- Behav Res Ther. 2008 Mar;46(3):296-321 - PubMed
- Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008 Apr;117(4):260-70 - PubMed
- Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;165(4):445-52 - PubMed
- Br J Psychiatry. 2008 May;192(5):362-7 - PubMed
- J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Apr;77(2):203-11 - PubMed
- PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 - PubMed
- Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Feb;30(1):37-50 - PubMed
- Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2010 Jul;122(1):11-9 - PubMed
- Psychol Med. 2010 Dec;40(12):2059-68 - PubMed
- J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;71(7):839-54 - PubMed
- Int J Psychophysiol. 2010 Oct;78(1):68-79 - PubMed
- J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;72(1):43-50 - PubMed
- J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010 Sep;198(9):647-52 - PubMed
- J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;72(1):98-113 - PubMed
- Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011 Jun;12(9):1419-28 - PubMed
- Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;27(2):146-50 - PubMed
- Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011 Dec;21(6):858-65 - PubMed
- Psychother Res. 2011 Nov;21(6):670-84 - PubMed
- Health Educ Behav. 2012 Aug;39(4):474-85 - PubMed
- Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):286-96 - PubMed
- Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;25(6):522-8 - PubMed
- J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 May;74(5):482-91 - PubMed
- J Consult Clin Psychol. 1990 Feb;58(1):77-84 - PubMed
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:MR000033 - PubMed
- J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 5;150(2):313-9 - PubMed
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 03;(6):CD004690 - PubMed
- J Psychopharmacol. 2014 May;28(5):403-39 - PubMed
- Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;207(2):115-22 - PubMed
- Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;46(11):984-92 - PubMed
- Behav Ther. 2016 Nov;47(6):869-885 - PubMed
- Lancet. 1988 Jul 30;2(8605):235-40 - PubMed
- J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Dec;56(6):877-84 - PubMed
- J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Dec;56(6):893-7 - PubMed
- Behav Res Ther. 1986;24(1):1-8 - PubMed
- Behav Res Ther. 1985;23(1):35-44 - PubMed
- Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1972 Jan;26(1):57-63 - PubMed
- Behav Res Ther. 1979;17(3):263-7 - PubMed
- Annu Rev Physiol. 1981;43:121-35 - PubMed
- Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984 Mar;41(3):238-45 - PubMed
- J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984 Dec;52(6):1090-7 - PubMed
- Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978 Jun;35(6):773-82 - PubMed
- J Clin Psychiatry. 1982 Oct;43(10):423-5 - PubMed
- Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1995 Jun;10(2):73-81 - PubMed
- Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Jun;164(6):759-69 - PubMed
- J Affect Disord. 1994 Apr;30(4):233-41 - PubMed
- J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Apr;61(2):317-26 - PubMed
- Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;151(3):413-20 - PubMed
- Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Jan;50(1):44-50 - PubMed
- Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Feb;162:219-26 - PubMed
- Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Apr;50(4):306-17 - PubMed
- Ann Clin Psychiatry. 1995 Dec;7(4):181-8 - PubMed
- Br J Psychiatry. 1996 Jul;169(1):93-7 - PubMed
- BMJ. 1996 Nov 9;313(7066):1200 - PubMed
- Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Mar;47(416):150-5 - PubMed
- Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Nov;154(11):1571-5 - PubMed
- Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976 Jun;33(6):766-71 - PubMed
- Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Aug;55(8):715-20 - PubMed
- Depress Anxiety. 1998;8(1):14-20 - PubMed
- Psychol Med. 1998 Sep;28(5):1149-57 - PubMed
- Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Nov;155(11):1570-7 - PubMed
- Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998 Dec;33(12):587-95 - PubMed
Substances
MeSH terms
Publication Types