Display options
Cite
Becker GE, Smith HA, Cooney F. Methods of milk expression for lactating women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;9:CD006170doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006170.pub5.
Becker, G. E., Smith, H. A., & Cooney, F. (2016). Methods of milk expression for lactating women. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 9CD006170. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006170.pub5
Becker, Genevieve E, et al. "Methods of milk expression for lactating women." The Cochrane database of systematic reviews vol. 9 (2016): CD006170. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006170.pub5
Becker GE, Smith HA, Cooney F. Methods of milk expression for lactating women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 29;9:CD006170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006170.pub5. PMID: 27684560; PMCID: PMC6457747.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 29;9:CD006170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006170.pub5.

Methods of milk expression for lactating women.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews

Genevieve E Becker, Hazel A Smith, Fionnuala Cooney

Affiliations

  1. BEST Services, 2 Kylemore Park, Galway, Ireland.

PMID: 27684560 PMCID: PMC6457747 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006170.pub5

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding is important, however not all infants can feed at the breast and methods of expressing milk need evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: To assess acceptability, effectiveness, safety, effect on milk composition, contamination and costs of methods of milk expression.

SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (21 March 2016), handsearched relevant journals and conference proceedings, and contacted experts in the field to seek additional published or unpublished studies. We also examined reference lists of all relevant retrieved papers.

SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing methods at any time after birth.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy.

MAIN RESULTS: This updated review includes 41 trials involving 2293 participants, with 22 trials involving 1339 participants contributing data for analysis. Twenty-six of the trials referred to mothers of infants in neonatal units (n = 1547) and 14 to mothers of healthy infants at home (n = 730), with one trial containing mothers of both neonatal and healthy older infants (n = 16). Eleven trials compared one or more types of pump versus hand expression and 14 studies compared one type of pump versus another type of pump, with three of these studies comparing both hand expression and pump types. Twenty studies compared a specific protocol or adjunct behaviour including sequential versus simultaneous pumping protocols, pumping frequency, provision of an education and support intervention, relaxation, breast massage, combining hand expression with pumping and a breast cleansing protocol.Due to heterogeneity in participants, interventions, and outcomes measured or reported, we were unable to pool findings for most of the specified outcomes. It was not possible therefore to produce a 'Summary of findings' table in this update. Most of the included results were derived from single studies. Trials took place in 14 countries under a variety of circumstances and were published from 1982 to 2015. Sixteen of the 30 trials that evaluated pumps or products had support from the manufacturers. The risk of bias of the included studies was variable. Primary outcomesOnly one of the 17 studies examining maternal satisfaction/acceptability with the method or adjunct behaviour provided data suitable for analysis. In this study, self-efficacy was assessed by asking mothers if they agreed or disagreed with the following statement: 'I don't want anyone to see me (hand expressing/pumping)'. The study found that mothers who were using the electric pump were more likely to agree with the statement compared to mothers hand expressing, (mean difference (MD) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 1.25; P = 0.01, participants = 68). Mothers who were hand expressing reported that the instructions for expression were clearer compared to the electric pump, (MD -0.40, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.05; P = 0.02, participants = 68). Descriptive reporting of satisfaction in the other studies varied in the measures used, did not indicate a clear preference for one pump type, although there was satisfaction with some relaxation and support interventions.We found no clinically significant differences between methods related to contamination of the milk that compared any type of pump to hand expression (risk ratio (RR) 1.13, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.61; P = 0.51, participants = 28), manual pump compared to hand expression, (MD 0.20, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.58; P = 0.30, participants = 142) a large electric pump compared to hand expression (MD 0.10, 95% CI -0.29 to 0.49; P = 0.61, participants = 123), or a large electric pump compared to a manual pump (MD -0.10, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.26; P = 0.59, participants = 141).The level of maternal breast or nipple pain or damage was similar in comparisons of a large electric pump to hand expression (MD 0.02, 95% CI -0.67 to 0.71; P = 0.96, participants = 68). A study comparing a manual and large electric pump, reported sore nipples in 7% for both groups and engorgement in 4% using a manual pump versus 6% using an electric pump; and in one study no nipple damage was reported in the hand-expression group, and one case of nipple damage in each of the manual pump and the large electric pump groups.One study examined adverse effects on infants, however as the infants did not all receive their mothers' expressed milk, we have not included the results. Secondary outcomesThe quantity of expressed milk obtained was increased, in some studies by a clinically significant amount, in interventions involving relaxation, music, warmth, massage, initiation of pumping, increased frequency of pumping and suitable breast shield size. Support programmes and simultaneous compared to sequential pumping did not show a difference in milk obtained. No pump consistently increased the milk volume obtained significantly.In relation to nutrient quality, hand expression or a large electric pump were found to provide higher protein than a manual pump, and hand expression provided higher sodium and lower potassium compared to a large electric pump or a manual pump. Fat content was higher with breast massage when pumping; no evidence of difference was found for energy content between methods.No consistent effect was found related to prolactin change or effect on oxytocin release with pump type or method. Economic aspects were not reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The most suitable method for milk expression may depend on the time since birth, purpose of expression and the individual mother and infant. Low-cost interventions including initiation of milk expression sooner after birth when not feeding at the breast, relaxation, massage, warming the breasts, hand expression and lower cost pumps may be as effective, or more effective, than large electric pumps for some outcomes. Variation in nutrient content across methods may be relevant to some infants. Small sample sizes, large standard deviations, and the diversity of the interventions argue caution in applying these results beyond the specific method tested in the specific settings. Independently funded research is needed for more trials on hand expression, relaxation and other techniques that do not have a commercial potential.

References

  1. Pediatrics. 1999 Apr;103(4 Pt 2):870-6 - PubMed
  2. Am J Health Promot. 1995 Nov-Dec;10(2):148-53 - PubMed
  3. Pediatrics. 1999 Jun;103(6 Pt 1):1150-7 - PubMed
  4. J Hum Lact. 1999 Sep;15(3):209-16 - PubMed
  5. Birth. 1999 Dec;26(4):233-8 - PubMed
  6. Indian J Pediatr. 1996 Jan-Feb;63(1):87-92 - PubMed
  7. Hum Reprod. 2001 Mar;16(3):581-3 - PubMed
  8. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 May;155(5):548-53 - PubMed
  9. Pediatrics. 2001 Jun;107(6):1291-7 - PubMed
  10. Pediatrics. 2001 Jun;107(6):E94 - PubMed
  11. J Pediatr. 2001 Aug;139(2):261-6 - PubMed
  12. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001 Sep;85(2):F91-5 - PubMed
  13. J Hosp Infect. 2001 Dec;49(4):274-81 - PubMed
  14. J Hum Lact. 2001 May;17(2):126-31 - PubMed
  15. J Hum Lact. 2001 Feb;17(1):9-13 - PubMed
  16. Pediatrics. 2002 Apr;109(4):e57 - PubMed
  17. J Fam Pract. 2002 May;51(5):439-44 - PubMed
  18. J Perinatol. 2002 Jul-Aug;22(5):354-9 - PubMed
  19. J Hum Lact. 2002 Nov;18(4):344-52 - PubMed
  20. J Hum Lact. 2002 Nov;18(4):353-60 - PubMed
  21. J Hum Lact. 2002 Nov;18(4):361-7 - PubMed
  22. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003 Jan;88(1):F11-4 - PubMed
  23. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Mar;157(3):237-43 - PubMed
  24. J Hum Lact. 2003 May;19(2):179-86; quiz 87-8, 218 - PubMed
  25. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2003 Apr-Jun;17(2):150-7 - PubMed
  26. Adv Neonatal Care. 2003 Apr;3(2):76-87 - PubMed
  27. Acta Paediatr. 2004 Feb;93(2):164-8 - PubMed
  28. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004 May;38(5):484-7 - PubMed
  29. Pediatrics. 2004 May;113(5):e435-9 - PubMed
  30. Acta Paediatr. 2004 Apr;93(4):518-22 - PubMed
  31. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2004;554:321-3 - PubMed
  32. Adv Neonatal Care. 2005 Apr;5(2):93-103 - PubMed
  33. J Hum Lact. 2005 May;21(2):169-74 - PubMed
  34. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 May;91(3):F169-74 - PubMed
  35. J Hum Lact. 2005 Nov;21(4):413-20 - PubMed
  36. Biochem J. 1933;27(5):1400-10 - PubMed
  37. Int Breastfeed J. 2006 Dec 22;1:28 - PubMed
  38. Breastfeed Rev. 2006 Nov;14(3):5-9 - PubMed
  39. Pediatrics. 2007 Apr;119(4):e837-42 - PubMed
  40. J Trop Pediatr. 2007 Apr;53(2):125-30 - PubMed
  41. Pediatrics. 1992 Mar;89(3):437-40 - PubMed
  42. Breastfeed Med. 2007 Jun;2(2):83-91 - PubMed
  43. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Apr;(153):1-186 - PubMed
  44. Breastfeed Med. 2008 Mar;3(1):3-10 - PubMed
  45. Breastfeed Med. 2008 Mar;3(1):11-9 - PubMed
  46. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 May;65(5):578-84 - PubMed
  47. Pediatr Nurs. 2008 Mar-Apr;34(2):125-30, 138 - PubMed
  48. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Dec;84(6):710-4 - PubMed
  49. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Aug;88(2):305-14 - PubMed
  50. Breastfeed Med. 2008 Sep;3(3):141-50 - PubMed
  51. Pediatrics. 2008 Oct;122 Suppl 2:S25-7 - PubMed
  52. Pediatrics. 2008 Oct;122 Suppl 2:S63-8 - PubMed
  53. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 08;(4):CD006170 - PubMed
  54. Breastfeed Med. 2009 Mar;4(1):17-23 - PubMed
  55. Pediatr Int. 2010 Feb;52(1):39-43 - PubMed
  56. J Perinatol. 2009 Nov;29(11):757-64 - PubMed
  57. Midwifery. 2011 Apr;27(2):209-14 - PubMed
  58. Lancet. 1990 Dec 22-29;336(8730):1519-23 - PubMed
  59. Am J Perinatol. 1991 Jan;8(1):25-7 - PubMed
  60. Alcohol. 2010 Mar;44(2):141-8 - PubMed
  61. Breastfeed Med. 2010 Apr;5(2):71-7 - PubMed
  62. J Perinat Educ. 2009 Spring;18(2):13-22 - PubMed
  63. Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):e1048-56 - PubMed
  64. Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):e1162-70 - PubMed
  65. Pediatrics. 2010 Jul;126(1):e18-25 - PubMed
  66. J Hum Lact. 2010 Aug;26(3):258-65 - PubMed
  67. Breastfeed Med. 2011 Apr;6(2):69-75 - PubMed
  68. Arch Dis Child. 1946 Mar;21:1-12 - PubMed
  69. BMJ. 1990 Jan 6;300(6716):11-6 - PubMed
  70. Soc Sci Med. 2011 May;72(9):1515-21 - PubMed
  71. Breastfeed Med. 2012 Apr;7(2):107-11 - PubMed
  72. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012 Jan;97(1):F18-23 - PubMed
  73. Breastfeed Med. 2012 Apr;7(2):112-7 - PubMed
  74. J Perinatol. 2012 Feb;32(2):103-10 - PubMed
  75. J Perinatol. 2012 Mar;32(3):205-9 - PubMed
  76. Matern Child Health J. 2012 Oct;16(7):1421-30 - PubMed
  77. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 07;(12):CD006170 - PubMed
  78. J Perinatol. 2012 Oct;32(10):791-6 - PubMed
  79. Matern Child Nutr. 2013 Jul;9(3):425-30 - PubMed
  80. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Feb;95(2):498-505 - PubMed
  81. Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129(3):e827-41 - PubMed
  82. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;(3):CD005544 - PubMed
  83. Breastfeed Med. 2012 Dec;7(6):487-8 - PubMed
  84. Adv Neonatal Care. 2012 Apr;12(2):112-9 - PubMed
  85. J Am Coll Nutr. 2012 Feb;31(1):63-9 - PubMed
  86. Zhonghua Hu Li Za Zhi. 1990 Sep;25(9):454-5 - PubMed
  87. Int Breastfeed J. 2012 Aug 29;7(1):11 - PubMed
  88. Breastfeed Med. 2012 Dec;7(6):442-7 - PubMed
  89. Midwifery. 2013 Jul;29(7):794-800 - PubMed
  90. J Perinatol. 2013 Jul;33(7):514-9 - PubMed
  91. Lancet. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):427-451 - PubMed
  92. J Res Health Sci. 2012 May 29;13(1):43-7 - PubMed
  93. J Hum Lact. 2013 Aug;29(3):412-9 - PubMed
  94. Int J Nurs Stud. 1990;27(3):257-65 - PubMed
  95. J Hum Lact. 1990 Sep;6(3):132-3 - PubMed
  96. J Hum Lact. 2014 Feb;30(1):62-72; quiz 110-2 - PubMed
  97. J Hum Lact. 2014 Feb;30(1):41-6 - PubMed
  98. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Nov 19;13:212 - PubMed
  99. Trials. 2013 Dec 27;14:445 - PubMed
  100. Adv Neonatal Care. 2014 Aug;14(4):E9-E19 - PubMed
  101. West J Nurs Res. 2016 May;38(5):529-52 - PubMed
  102. J Hosp Infect. 1989 Jan;13(1):27-31 - PubMed
  103. Breastfeed Med. 2015 Mar;10(2):84-91 - PubMed
  104. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 27;(2):CD006170 - PubMed
  105. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 06;10(3):e0119624 - PubMed
  106. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Apr 02;15:81 - PubMed
  107. BMJ Open. 2015 May 07;5(5):e007512 - PubMed
  108. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Apr;9(4):CC04-6 - PubMed
  109. Breastfeed Med. 2015 Sep;10(7):352-4 - PubMed
  110. Breastfeed Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;10(6):312-7 - PubMed
  111. Breastfeed Med. 2015 Nov;10(9):412-5 - PubMed
  112. Pediatrics. 1989 Jan;83(1):57-60 - PubMed
  113. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Oct 20;15:268 - PubMed
  114. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Nov;101(6):F502-F506 - PubMed
  115. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1989 May-Jun;18(3):231-6 - PubMed
  116. Lancet. 1987 Aug 8;2(8554):319-22 - PubMed
  117. Pediatrics. 1988 Jun;81(6):815-20 - PubMed
  118. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1985;64(8):673-5 - PubMed
  119. Oxf Rev Reprod Biol. 1985;7:118-67 - PubMed
  120. Am J Dis Child. 1985 May;139(5):483-5 - PubMed
  121. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1985 May;39(3):193-202 - PubMed
  122. Hum Nutr Appl Nutr. 1985 Dec;39(6):426-30 - PubMed
  123. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1984;3(1):108-22 - PubMed
  124. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Apr 9;286(6372):1180-1 - PubMed
  125. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1984 Mar;3(2):284-9 - PubMed
  126. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1984;3(1):104-7 - PubMed
  127. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1984 Mar;3(2):280-3 - PubMed
  128. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Jan 10;282(6258):99-100 - PubMed
  129. J Nurse Midwifery. 1982 May-Jun;27(3):3-8 - PubMed
  130. Early Hum Dev. 1982 Apr;6(2):153-9 - PubMed
  131. Early Hum Dev. 1982 Jul;6(3):295-303 - PubMed
  132. Am J Dis Child. 1981 Apr;135(4):340-3 - PubMed
  133. Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond). 1981;22:1-37 - PubMed
  134. Early Hum Dev. 1994 Aug;38(2):131-8 - PubMed
  135. Pediatrics. 1994 Dec;94(6 Pt 1):853-60 - PubMed
  136. Diabetes Care. 1994 Jan;17(1):13-9 - PubMed
  137. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1994 Jan;23(1):46-52 - PubMed
  138. J Nurse Midwifery. 1993 Sep-Oct;38(5):257-66 - PubMed
  139. Proc Nutr Soc. 1995 Jul;54(2):401-6 - PubMed
  140. Neonatal Netw. 1995 Dec;14(8):31-6 - PubMed
  141. J Hum Lact. 1996 Sep;12(3):193-9 - PubMed
  142. J Hum Lact. 1997 Jun;13(2):127-30 - PubMed
  143. Lancet. 1997 Jul 19;350(9072):166-8 - PubMed
  144. J Hum Lact. 1997 Sep;13(3):195-202 - PubMed
  145. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998 Apr;77(2):131-9 - PubMed
  146. Pediatrics. 1998 Sep;102(3):E38 - PubMed

Publication Types