Display options
Share it on

Pol J Radiol. 2016 Sep 08;81:428-33. doi: 10.12659/PJR.897388. eCollection 2016.

Modified Right Heart Contrast Echocardiography Versus Traditional Method in Diagnosis of Right-to-Left Shunt: A Comparative Study.

Polish journal of radiology

Yi Wang, Jie Zeng, Lixue Yin, Mei Zhang, Dailun Hou

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Ultrasound Medicine, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China; Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China.
  2. Department of Cardiology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China.
  3. Institute of Ultrasound Medicine, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China.
  4. Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China.
  5. Department of Medical Image, Shandong Chest Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China.

PMID: 27668027 PMCID: PMC5019139 DOI: 10.12659/PJR.897388

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability, effectiveness, and safety of modified right heart contrast transthoracic echocardiography (cTTE) in comparison with the traditional method.

MATERIAL/METHODS: We performed a modified right heart cTTE using saline mixed with a small sample of patient's own blood. Samples were agitated with varying intensity. This study protocol involved microscopic analysis and patient evaluation. 1. Microscopic analysis: After two contrast samples had been agitated 10 or 20 times, they underwent a comparison of bubble size, bubble number, and red blood cell morphology. 2. Patient analysis: 40 patients with suspected RLS (right- to-left shunt) were enrolled. All patients underwent right heart contrast echocardiography. Oxygen saturation, transit time and duration, presence of RLS, change in indirect bilirubin and urobilinogen concentrations were compared afterward.

RESULTS: Modified method generated more bubbles (P<0.05), but the differences in bubble size were not significant (P>0.05). Twenty-four patients were diagnosed with RLS (60%) using the modified method compared to 16 patients (40%) with the traditional method. The transit time of ASb20 group was the shortest (P<0.05). However, the duration time in this group was much longer (P<0.05). Also, in semi-quantitative analysis mean rank of RLS was higher after injecting the modified contrast agent agitated 20 times (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Modified right heart contrast echocardiography is a reliable, effective and safe method of detecting cardiovascular RLS.

Keywords: Contrast Media; Echocardiography; Microbubbles

References

  1. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2007 Jun;8(3):S2-12 - PubMed
  2. Am J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 15;115(6):837-43 - PubMed
  3. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009 Feb;22(2):107-33 - PubMed
  4. Heart. 2005 Apr;91(4):438-40 - PubMed
  5. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013 Jan;26(1):96-102 - PubMed
  6. Stroke. 2002 Sep;33(9):2211-6 - PubMed
  7. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Dec;18(12 ):1440-63 - PubMed
  8. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999 Feb;12(2):94-8 - PubMed
  9. Am J Cardiol. 1994 Aug 15;74(4):381-4 - PubMed
  10. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002 Feb;15(2):167-84 - PubMed
  11. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2008 Apr;101(4):199-201 - PubMed
  12. Chest. 2003 Feb;123(2):320-2 - PubMed
  13. N Engl J Med. 1988 May 5;318(18):1148-52 - PubMed
  14. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;23 (5-6):424-9 - PubMed
  15. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1996 Nov-Dec;7(6):787-804 - PubMed
  16. Stroke. 2014 Jul;45(7):2160-236 - PubMed
  17. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Nov 1;46(9):1768-76 - PubMed
  18. Circulation. 2002 Jun 4;105(22):2625-31 - PubMed
  19. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 May;81(5):615-8 - PubMed
  20. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jul;3(7):749-60 - PubMed

Publication Types