Display options
Share it on

Online J Rural Nurs Health Care. 2015;15(1):42-59. doi: 10.14574/ojrnhc.v15i1.339.

Do Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors Differ By Rural Classification in Women Who Enroll in a Weight Loss Intervention?.

Online journal of rural nursing and health care : the official journal of the Rural Nurse Organization

Dieu-My Thi Tran, Carol H Pullen, Lani M Zimmerman, Patricia A Hageman

Affiliations

  1. University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing, Omaha, Nebraska.
  2. University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing, Lincoln, Nebraska.
  3. University of Nebraska Medical Center, Division of Physical Therapy Education, College of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska.

PMID: 26161046 PMCID: PMC4494758 DOI: 10.14574/ojrnhc.v15i1.339

Abstract

PURPOSE: If clinicians and researchers are aware of specific cardiovascular risks associated with women's rural status, whether it be large or small/isolated rural areas, it may help in developing more relevant rural resources. The purpose of this study was to examine whether there were differences in modifiable cardiovascular risk factors of overweight and obese rural women living in large or small/isolated rural areas.

SAMPLE: This secondary analysis examined baseline cross-sectional data from the "Web-based Weight Loss and Weight Maintenance Intervention for Older Rural Women" clinical trial. Analysis included data from 299 rural Midwestern women, ages 40-69 years with a baseline body mass index of 28-45 kg/m

METHODS: Demographic and biomarker baseline data were used. Chi-square and independent t-tests were used for data analyses.

FINDINGS: There are no significant differences found in overweight and obese women with cardiovascular risk factors when compared to rural classification, with one exception. Total cholesterol was associated with rural classification (p=0.047), where women living in large rural areas were more likely to have elevated total cholesterol levels (≥240 mg/dL) compared to women living in small/isolated areas (18.5% vs. 10.0%, respectively). Demographic characteristics such as age and education demonstrated no significant differences by rural classification; however, the majority of women in this study were of high socioeconomic status.

CONCLUSIONS: Although this secondary analysis found that rural women have similar cardiovascular risk factors and demographic characteristics, this study highlights the need for clinicians to carefully consider the rural community characteristics for primary prevention.

Keywords: Cardiovascular risk factors; middle-aged and older women; rural classification

References

  1. J Rural Health. 2005 Spring;21(2):140-8 - PubMed
  2. Diabetes Educ. 2010 May-Jun;36(3):483-8 - PubMed
  3. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 May;17(4):607-17 - PubMed
  4. BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 30;11:521 - PubMed
  5. Circulation. 2002 Dec 17;106(25):3143-421 - PubMed
  6. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Apr 25;2(3):e000058 - PubMed
  7. Circulation. 2013 Jan 1;127(1):e6-e245 - PubMed
  8. Dis Model Mech. 2014 Feb;7(2):171-3 - PubMed
  9. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Mar 22;57(12):1404-23 - PubMed
  10. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013 Mar;22(3):210-8 - PubMed
  11. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2010 Sep;21(3):27-34 - PubMed
  12. J Rural Health. 2013 Jun;29(3):248-57 - PubMed
  13. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jan;43(1):165-70 - PubMed
  14. Am J Public Health. 2005 Jul;95(7):1149-55 - PubMed
  15. JAMA. 2003 May 21;289(19):2560-72 - PubMed
  16. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Sep;9(3):236-45 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support