Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 25;6:315. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00315. eCollection 2015.

Surrogate utility estimation by long-term partners and unfamiliar dyads.

Frontiers in psychology

Richard J Tunney, Fenja V Ziegler

Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, University of Nottingham Nottingham, UK.
  2. School of Psychology, University of Lincoln Lincoln, UK.

PMID: 25859227 PMCID: PMC4373268 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00315

Abstract

To what extent are people able to make predictions about other people's preferences and values?We report two experiments that present a novel method assessing some of the basic processes in surrogate decision-making, namely surrogate-utility estimation. In each experiment participants formed dyads who were asked to assign utilities to health related items and commodity items, and to predict their partner's utility judgments for the same items. In experiment one we showed that older adults in long-term relationships were able to accurately predict their partner's wishes. In experiment two we showed that younger adults who were relatively unfamiliar with one another were also able to predict other people's wishes. Crucially we demonstrated that these judgments were accurate even after partialling out each participant's own preferences indicating that in order to make surrogate utility estimations people engage in perspective-taking rather than simple anchoring and adjustment, suggesting that utility estimation is not the cause of inaccuracy in surrogate decision-making. The data and implications are discussed with respect to theories of surrogate decision-making.

Keywords: decision-making; perspective-taking; surrogate accuracy; surrogate decisions; utility estimations

References

  1. Psychol Sci. 2006 Apr;17(4):311-8 - PubMed
  2. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49479 - PubMed
  3. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Sep;87(3):327-39 - PubMed
  4. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13;166(5):493-7 - PubMed
  5. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2012 Mar;18(1):38-51 - PubMed
  6. Res Aging. 2009;31(4):463-491 - PubMed
  7. J Med Ethics. 1989 Sep;15(3):129-36 - PubMed
  8. Health Psychol. 2001 May;20(3):166-75 - PubMed
  9. Gerontologist. 2008 Dec;48(6):811-9 - PubMed
  10. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Apr 11;171(7):630-4 - PubMed

Publication Types