Display options
Share it on

World J Hepatol. 2015 Feb 27;7(2):276-84. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i2.276.

Post-transplantation hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence: Patterns and relation between vascularity and differentiation degree.

World journal of hepatology

Annarita Pecchi, Giulia Besutti, Mario De Santis, Cinzia Del Giovane, Sofia Nosseir, Giuseppe Tarantino, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Pietro Torricelli

Affiliations

  1. Annarita Pecchi, Giulia Besutti, Mario De Santis, Pietro Torricelli, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy.

PMID: 25729483 PMCID: PMC4342610 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i2.276

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the relationship between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) vascularity and grade; to describe patterns and vascular/histopathological variations of post-transplantation recurrence.

METHODS: This retrospective study included 165 patients (143 men, 22 women; median age 56.8 years, range 28-70.4 years) transplanted for HCC who had a follow-up period longer than 2 mo. Pre-transplantation dynamic computed tomography or magnetic resonance examinations were retrospectively reviewed, classifying HCC imaging enhancement pattern into hypervascular and hypovascular based on presence of wash-in during arterial phase. All pathologic reports of the explanted livers were reviewed, collecting data about HCC differentiation degree. The association between imaging vascular pattern and pathological grade was estimated using the Fisher exact test. All follow-up clinical and imaging data were reviewed for evidence of recurrence. Recurrence rate was calculated and imaging features of recurrent tumor were collected, classifying early and late recurrences based on timing (< or ≥ 2 years after transplantation) and intrahepatic, extrahepatic and both intrahepatic and extrahepatic recurrences based on location. All intrahepatic recurrences were classified as hypervascular or hypovascular and the differentiation degree was collected where available. The presence of variations in imaging enhancement pattern and pathological grade between the primary tumor and the intrahepatic recurrence was evaluated and the association between imaging and histopatholgical variations was estimated by using the χ(2) test.

RESULTS: Of the 163 patients with imaging evidence of viable tumor, 156 (95.7%) had hypervascular and 7 (4.3%) hypovascular HCC. Among the 125 patients with evidence of viable tumor in the explanted liver, 19 (15.2%) had grade 1, 56 (44.8%) grade 2, 40 (32%) grade 3 and 4 (3.2%) grade 4 HCC, while the differentiation degree was not assessable for 6 patients (4.8%). A significant association was found between imaging vascularity and pathological grade (P = 0.035). Post-transplantation recurrence rate was 14.55% (24/165). All recurrences occurred in patients who had a hypervascular primary tumor. Three patients (12.5%) experienced late recurrence; the location of the first recurrence was extrahepatic in 14 patients (58.3%), intrahepatic in 7 patients (29.2%) and both intrahepatic and extrahepatic in 3 patients (12.5%). Two patients had a variation in imaging characteristics between the primary HCC (hypervascular) and the intrahepatic recurrent HCC (hypovascular), while 1 patient had a variation of histopathological characteristics (from moderate to poor differentiation), however no association was found between imaging and histopathological variations.

CONCLUSION: A correlation was found between HCC grade and vascularity; some degree of variability may exist between the primary and the recurrence imaging/histopathological characteristics, apparently not correlated.

Keywords: Cell differentiation; Contrast media; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver transplantation; Recurrence

References

  1. Abdom Imaging. 2012 Apr;37(2):215-30 - PubMed
  2. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Aug;189(2):352-8 - PubMed
  3. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Jun;81(6):1116-21 - PubMed
  4. Abdom Imaging. 2012 Jun;37(3):439-46 - PubMed
  5. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):W482-9 - PubMed
  6. Radiology. 2011 Mar;258(3):673-93 - PubMed
  7. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Jan;190(1):W28-34 - PubMed
  8. World J Surg. 2011 Sep;35(9):2058-62 - PubMed
  9. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011 Dec;17(4):328-33 - PubMed
  10. Carcinogenesis. 2008 Jul;29(7):1299-305 - PubMed
  11. Radiology. 2007 Sep;244(3):898-906 - PubMed
  12. Radiology. 2013 Jun;267(3):776-86 - PubMed
  13. Asian J Surg. 2011 Jul;34(3):128-34 - PubMed
  14. Br J Radiol. 2012 Sep;85(1017):e573-83 - PubMed
  15. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Jun;33(6):1399-405 - PubMed
  16. Liver Transpl. 2004 Apr;10(4):534-40 - PubMed
  17. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Oct;197(4):W665-73 - PubMed
  18. N Engl J Med. 1996 Mar 14;334(11):693-9 - PubMed
  19. Liver. 1999 Feb;19(1):12-8 - PubMed
  20. Hepatology. 1993 Mar;17(3):355-60 - PubMed
  21. Hepatology. 2005 Jul;42(1):27-34 - PubMed
  22. Hepatology. 2005 Nov;42(5):1208-36 - PubMed

Publication Types