Display options
Share it on

Can J Surg. 2014 Jun;57(3):E82-8. doi: 10.1503/cjs.011413.

Attempting primary closure for all open fractures: the effectiveness of an institutional protocol.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie

Farhad O Moola, Alberto Carli, Gregory K Berry, Rudolf Reindl, Duncan Jacks, Edward J Harvey

Affiliations

  1. Fraser Orthopaedic Institute, University of British Columbia, New Westminster, BC.
  2. The Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, Que.
  3. The Royal Jubilee Hospital, Victoria, BC.

PMID: 24869621 PMCID: PMC4035410 DOI: 10.1503/cjs.011413

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immediate primary closure of open fractures has been historically believed to increase the risk of wound infection and fracture nonunion. Recent literature has challenged this belief, but uncertainty remains as to whether primary closure can be used as routine practice. This study evaluates the impact of an institutional protocol mandating primary closure for all open fractures.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all open fractures treated in a single level 1 trauma centre in a 5-year period. Prior to the study, a protocol was adopted standardizing management of open fractures and advocating primary closure of all wounds as a necessary goal of operative treatment. Patient and fracture characteristics, type of wound closure and development of infectious and bone healing complications were evaluated from time of injury to completion of outpatient follow-up.

RESULTS: A total of 297 open fractures were treated, 255 (85.8%) of them with immediate primary closure. Type III open injuries accounted for 24% of all injuries. Wounds that were immediately closed had a superficial infection rate of 11% and a deep infection rate of 4.7%. Both proportions are equivalent to or lower than historical controls for delayed closure. Fracture classification, velocity of trauma and time to wound closure did not correlate significantly with infection, delayed union or nonunion.

CONCLUSION: Attempting primary closure for all open fractures is a safe and efficient practice that does not increase the postoperative risk of infection and delayed union or nonunion.

References

  1. Arch Surg. 1988 Mar;123(3):333-9 - PubMed
  2. Int Orthop. 1989;13(3):179-80 - PubMed
  3. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2008 Jan;17(1):1-6 - PubMed
  4. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002 Nov-Dec;10(6):379-84 - PubMed
  5. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Jul;78(7):1039-47 - PubMed
  6. J Orthop Trauma. 1998 Jan;12(1):1-7 - PubMed
  7. J Trauma. 1999 Jun;46(6):1049-54 - PubMed
  8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Sep;(178):36-41 - PubMed
  9. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 Jan;72(1):125-8 - PubMed
  10. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Feb;(335):268-74 - PubMed
  11. J Trauma. 1970 Oct;10(10):853-66 - PubMed
  12. J Trauma. 1983 Jan;23(1):25-30 - PubMed
  13. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974 Apr;56(3):532-41 - PubMed
  14. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Jun;58(4):453-8 - PubMed
  15. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Feb;91(2):217-24 - PubMed
  16. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jul;87(7):1415-22 - PubMed
  17. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986 Sep;78(3):285-92 - PubMed
  18. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Feb;72(2):299-304 - PubMed
  19. J Orthop Trauma. 2000 Nov;14(8):529-33 - PubMed
  20. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85(1):1-3 - PubMed
  21. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Sep;82(7):959-66 - PubMed
  22. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007 Feb;127(2):131-6 - PubMed
  23. Instr Course Lect. 2011;60:15-25 - PubMed
  24. Injury. 2004 Jun;35(6):557-61 - PubMed
  25. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Aug;77(8):1291-2 - PubMed
  26. J Trauma. 1984 Aug;24(8):742-6 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types