Display options
Share it on

Rehabil Psychol. 2013 Nov;58(4):334-41. doi: 10.1037/a0034393.

Meaning in life: an important factor for the psychological well-being of chronically ill patients?.

Rehabilitation psychology

Jessie Dezutter, Sara Casalin, Amy Wachholtz, Koen Luyckx, Jessica Hekking, Wim Vandewiele

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Research Group Clinical Psychology, University of Leuven.

PMID: 24295525 PMCID: PMC4113206 DOI: 10.1037/a0034393

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate 2 dimensions of meaning in life--Presence of Meaning (i.e., the perception of your life as significant, purposeful, and valuable) and Search for Meaning (i.e., the strength, intensity, and activity of people's efforts to establish or increase their understanding of the meaning in their lives)--and their role for the well-being of chronically ill patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN: A sample of 481 chronically ill patients (M = 50 years, SD = 7.26) completed measures on meaning in life, life satisfaction, optimism, and acceptance. We hypothesized that Presence of Meaning and Search for Meaning will have specific relations with all 3 aspects of well-being.

RESULTS: Cluster analysis was used to examine meaning in life profiles. RESULTS supported 4 distinguishable profiles (High Presence High Search, Low Presence High Search, High Presence Low Search, and Low Presence Low Search) with specific patterns in relation to well-being and acceptance. Specifically, the 2 profiles in which meaning is present showed higher levels of well-being and acceptance, whereas the profiles in which meaning is absent are characterized by lower levels. Furthermore, the results provided some clarification on the nature of the Search for Meaning process by distinguishing between adaptive (the High Presence High Search cluster) and maladaptive (the Low Presence High Search cluster) searching for meaning in life.

CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides an initial glimpse in how meaning in life may be related to the well-being of chronically ill patients and the acceptance of their condition. Clinical implications are discussed.

PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

References

  1. Br J Clin Psychol. 1996 Nov;35(4):503-16 - PubMed
  2. J Pers. 2014 Feb;82(1):57-68 - PubMed
  3. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Jan;90(1):179-96 - PubMed
  4. Psychooncology. 2010 Jan;19(1):21-8 - PubMed
  5. Psychol Bull. 2010 Mar;136(2):257-301 - PubMed
  6. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2006 May;59(Pt 1):1-34 - PubMed
  7. J Pers. 2008 Apr;76(2):199-228 - PubMed
  8. Br J Psychol. 1992 Feb;83 ( Pt 1):133-45 - PubMed
  9. Support Care Cancer. 2009 Mar;17(3):253-9 - PubMed
  10. Psychol Health. 2012;27(4):475-90 - PubMed
  11. Int J Behav Med. 2011 Mar;18(1):44-51 - PubMed
  12. J Pers. 2005 Aug;73(4):985-1013 - PubMed
  13. Multivariate Behav Res. 2000 Apr 1;35(2):261-85 - PubMed
  14. Rehabil Psychol. 2009 Aug;54(3):306-14 - PubMed
  15. Ann Behav Med. 2010 Feb;39(1):4-15 - PubMed
  16. Gerontologist. 2002 Oct;42 Spec No 3:24-33 - PubMed
  17. J Behav Med. 2010 Oct;33(5):364-77 - PubMed
  18. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Oct;76(5):863-75 - PubMed
  19. Dev Psychopathol. 1997 Spring;9(2):291-319 - PubMed
  20. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5 - PubMed
  21. Psychooncology. 2010 Dec;19(12):1340-7 - PubMed
  22. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Aug;77(4):730-41 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support