Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013 Sep 01;13(4):1-72. eCollection 2013.
Discharge planning in chronic conditions: an evidence-based analysis.
Ontario health technology assessment series
K McMartin
PMID: 24167538
PMCID: PMC3804053
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronically ill people experience frequent changes in health status accompanied by multiple transitions between care settings and care providers. Discharge planning provides support services, follow-up activities, and other interventions that span pre-hospital discharge to post-hospital settings.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if discharge planning is effective at reducing health resource utilization and improving patient outcomes compared with standard care alone.
DATA SOURCES: A standard systematic literature search was conducted for studies published from January 1, 2004, until December 13, 2011.
REVIEW METHODS: Reports, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses with 1 month or more of follow-up and limited to specified chronic conditions were examined. Outcomes included mortality/survival, readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits, hospital length of stay (LOS), health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: One meta-analysis compared individualized discharge planning to usual care and found a significant reduction in readmissions favouring individualized discharge planning. A second meta-analysis compared comprehensive discharge planning with postdischarge support to usual care. There was a significant reduction in readmissions favouring discharge planning with postdischarge support. However, there was significant statistical heterogeneity. For both meta-analyses there was a nonsignificant reduction in mortality between the study arms.
LIMITATIONS: There was difficulty in distinguishing the relative contribution of each element within the terms "discharge planning" and "postdischarge support." For most studies, "usual care" was not explicitly described.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with usual care, there was moderate quality evidence that individualized discharge planning is more effective at reducing readmissions or hospital LOS but not mortality, and very low quality evidence that it is more effective at improving HRQOL or patient satisfaction. Compared with usual care, there was low quality evidence that the discharge planning plus postdischarge support is more effective at reducing readmissions but not more effective at reducing hospital LOS or mortality. There was very low quality evidence that it is more effective at improving HRQOL or patient satisfaction.
References
- Ann Intern Med. 2009 Feb 3;150(3):178-87 - PubMed
- Eur J Heart Fail. 2001 Mar;3(2):209-15 - PubMed
- Home Health Care Serv Q. 2007;26(4):3-19 - PubMed
- J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):380-2 - PubMed
- J Card Fail. 2002 Jun;8(3):142-8 - PubMed
- JAMA. 1999 Feb 17;281(7):613-20 - PubMed
- J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Oct 2;40(7):1259-66 - PubMed
- Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):520-8 - PubMed
- Home Health Care Serv Q. 2009;28(2-3):84-99 - PubMed
- Heart. 1998 Nov;80(5):442-6 - PubMed
- Age Ageing. 2001 Jan;30(1):33-40 - PubMed
- Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Aug;60(2):152-9 - PubMed
- J Hosp Med. 2009 Apr;4(4):211-8 - PubMed
- Arch Intern Med. 2002 Mar 25;162(6):705-12 - PubMed
- Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Feb;17(1):43-51 - PubMed
- Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1994 Fall;10(4):714-5 - PubMed
- Eur J Heart Fail. 2004 Aug;6(5):643-52 - PubMed
- J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Jan 2;39(1):83-9 - PubMed
- BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Apr 04;7:47 - PubMed
- J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Aug;23(8):1228-33 - PubMed
- Gerontologist. 1987 Oct;27(5):577-80 - PubMed
- Eur J Intern Med. 2009 Mar;20(2):221-5 - PubMed
- JAMA. 2004 Mar 17;291(11):1358-67 - PubMed
- Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1994 Jan-Feb;18(1):15-23 - PubMed
- J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Aug;52(8):1240-6 - PubMed
- Am J Med. 2005 Oct;118(10):1148-53 - PubMed
- Am J Med. 2001 Dec 21;111(9B):26S-30S - PubMed
- Eff Clin Pract. 1999 Sep-Oct;2(5):201-9 - PubMed
- Aust Health Rev. 2010 Nov;34(4):445-51 - PubMed
- Lancet. 1999 Sep 25;354(9184):1077-83 - PubMed
- Eur Heart J. 1999 May;20(9):673-82 - PubMed
- Aust Health Rev. 2007 Feb;31(1):34-48 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 1995 Nov 2;333(18):1190-5 - PubMed
- Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Apr;81(4):247-52 - PubMed
- Clin Invest Med. 1994 Apr;17(2):88-96 - PubMed
- J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 May;52(5):675-84 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2001 Sep 29;323(7315):715-8 - PubMed
- J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Nov;8(11):585-90 - PubMed
- J Adv Nurs. 2008 Jun;62(5):585-95 - PubMed
- Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):746-54 - PubMed
- Med Care. 2002 Apr;40(4):271-82 - PubMed
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD000313 - PubMed
- Arch Intern Med. 1998 May 25;158(10):1067-72 - PubMed
- Ugeskr Laeger. 1989 Jun 12;151(24):1531-4 - PubMed
- Arch Intern Med. 2006 Sep 25;166(17):1822-8 - PubMed
- J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jan;17(1):109-17 - PubMed
- Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999 Jul 1;56(13):1339-42 - PubMed
- J Clin Nurs. 2009 Sep;18(17):2444-55 - PubMed
- Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jun 15;120(12):999-1006 - PubMed
- J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Oct;42(10):1045-9 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 1996 May 30;334(22):1441-7 - PubMed
- Med Care. 1993 Apr;31(4):358-70 - PubMed
- Arch Intern Med. 2003 Apr 14;163(7):809-17 - PubMed
- CMAJ. 1992 Feb 15;146(4):511-5 - PubMed
- Pharm World Sci. 2004 Apr;26(2):114-20 - PubMed
- Stroke. 2000 Aug;31(8):1929-34 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Publication Types