Display options
Share it on

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013 Sep 01;13(9):1-60. eCollection 2013.

Self-management support interventions for persons with chronic disease: an evidence-based analysis.

Ontario health technology assessment series

J Franek

PMID: 24194800 PMCID: PMC3814807

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-management support interventions such as the Stanford Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) are becoming more widespread in attempt to help individuals better self-manage chronic disease.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess the clinical effectiveness of self-management support interventions for persons with chronic diseases.

DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed on January 15, 2012, using OVID MEDLINE, OVID MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, OVID EMBASE, EBSCO Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Wiley Cochrane Library, and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination database for studies published between January 1, 2000, and January 15, 2012. A January 1, 2000, start date was used because the concept of non-disease-specific/general chronic disease self-management was first published only in 1999. Reference lists were examined for any additional relevant studies not identified through the search.

REVIEW METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing self-management support interventions for general chronic disease against usual care were included for analysis. Results of RCTs were pooled using a random-effects model with standardized mean difference as the summary statistic.

RESULTS: Ten primary RCTs met the inclusion criteria (n = 6,074). Nine of these evaluated the Stanford CDSMP across various populations; results, therefore, focus on the CDSMP. HEALTH STATUS OUTCOMES: There was a small, statistically significant improvement in favour of CDSMP across most health status measures, including pain, disability, fatigue, depression, health distress, and self-rated health (GRADE quality low). There was no significant difference between modalities for dyspnea (GRADE quality very low). There was significant improvement in health-related quality of life according to the EuroQol 5-D in favour of CDSMP, but inconsistent findings across other quality-of-life measures.HEALTHY BEHAVIOUR OUTCOMES: There was a small, statistically significant improvement in favour of CDSMP across all healthy behaviours, including aerobic exercise, cognitive symptom management, and communication with health care professionals (GRADE quality low).Self-efficacy: There was a small, statistically significant improvement in self-efficacy in favour of CDSMP (GRADE quality low).HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION OUTCOMES: There were no statistically significant differences between modalities with respect to visits with general practitioners, visits to the emergency department, days in hospital, or hospitalizations (GRADE quality very low).All results were measured over the short term (median 6 months of follow-up).

LIMITATIONS: Trials generally did not appropriately report data according to intention-to-treat principles. Results therefore reflect "available case analyses," including only those participants whose outcome status was recorded. For this reason, there is high uncertainty around point estimates.

CONCLUSIONS: The Stanford CDSMP led to statistically significant, albeit clinically minimal, short-term improvements across a number of health status measures (including some measures of health-related quality of life), healthy behaviours, and self-efficacy compared to usual care. However, there was no evidence to suggest that the CDSMP improved health care utilization. More research is needed to explore longer-term outcomes, the impact of self-management on clinical outcomes, and to better identify responders and non-responders.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Self-management support interventions are becoming more common as a structured way of helping patients learn to better manage their chronic disease. To assess the effects of these support interventions, we looked at the results of 10 studies involving a total of 6,074 people with various chronic diseases, such as arthritis and chronic pain, chronic respiratory diseases, depression, diabetes, heart disease, and stroke. Most trials focused on a program called the Stanford Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP). When compared to usual care, the CDSMP led to modest, short-term improvements in pain, disability, fatigue, depression, health distress, self-rated health, and health-related quality of life, but it is not possible to say whether these changes were clinically important. The CDSMP also increased how often people undertook aerobic exercise, how often they practiced stress/pain reduction techniques, and how often they communicated with their health care practitioners. The CDSMP did not reduce the number of primary care doctor visits, emergency department visits, the number of days in hospital, or the number of times people were hospitalized. In general, there was high uncertainty around the quality of the evidence, and more research is needed to better understand the effect of self-management support on long-term outcomes and on important clinical outcomes, as well as to better identify who could benefit most from self-management support interventions like the CDSMP.

References

  1. Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11):964-71 - PubMed
  2. Med Care. 1999 Jan;37(1):5-14 - PubMed
  3. Chronic Illn. 2011 Jun;7(2):162-72 - PubMed
  4. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):e39-47 - PubMed
  5. Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Nov;55(520):831-7 - PubMed
  6. BMJ. 2008 Mar 15;336(7644):601-5 - PubMed
  7. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD005108 - PubMed
  8. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1994 Fall;10(4):714-5 - PubMed
  9. Br J Health Psychol. 2009 Sep;14(Pt 3):473-87 - PubMed
  10. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):380-2 - PubMed
  11. Soc Sci Med. 2007 May;64(9):1832-41 - PubMed
  12. Med Care. 2008 May;46(5):523-31 - PubMed
  13. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Mar;61(3):254-61 - PubMed
  14. Nurs Res. 2003 Nov-Dec;52(6):361-9 - PubMed
  15. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Nov;81(2):207-13 - PubMed
  16. Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):360-8 - PubMed
  17. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Dec 15;127(12):1097-102 - PubMed
  18. Arthritis Rheum. 1989 Jan;32(1):91-5 - PubMed
  19. Ann Fam Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;7(4):319-27 - PubMed
  20. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(3):174-82 - PubMed
  21. Br J Health Psychol. 2010 May;15(Pt 2):321-35 - PubMed
  22. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Apr;62(4):361-7 - PubMed
  23. Chronic Illn. 2008 Sep;4(3):173-82 - PubMed
  24. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Dec 21;5:70 - PubMed
  25. Med Care. 2001 Nov;39(11):1217-23 - PubMed
  26. BMJ. 1999 Sep 11;319(7211):670-4 - PubMed
  27. Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9 - PubMed
  28. Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Mar;58(548):198-203 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types