Display options
Share it on

Environ Monit Assess. 1996 Sep;42(1):73-97. doi: 10.1007/BF00394043.

Control of rumen methanogenesis.

Environmental monitoring and assessment

C J Van Nevel, D I Demeyer

Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Production, University of Ghent, 9090, Melle, Belgium.

PMID: 24193494 DOI: 10.1007/BF00394043

Abstract

During the last decades, considerable research on methane production in the rumen and its inhibition has been carried out. Initially, as methane production represents a significant loss of gross energy in the feed (2-15%), the ultimate goal of such intervention in rumen fermentation was an increase in feed efficiency. A second reason favouring research on methane inhibition is its role in the global warming phenomenon and in the destruction of the ozone layer. In this review, the authors describe briefly several interventions for reducing methane emission by ruminants. The objective can be reached by intervention at the dietary level by ration manipulation (composition, feeding level) or by the use of additives or supplements. Examples of additives are polyhalogenated compounds, ionophores and other antibiotics. Supplementation of the ration with lipids also lowered methanogenesis. More biotechnological interventions, e.g., defaunation, probiotics and introduction of reductive acetogenesis in the rumen, are also mentioned. It can be concluded that drastic inhibition of methane production is not unequivocally successful as a result of several factors, such as: instantaneous inhibition often followed by restoration of methanogenesis due to adaptation of the microbes or degradation of the additive, toxicity for the host animal, negative effects on overall digestion and productive performance. Therefore, methanogenesis and its inhibition cannot be considered as a separate part of rumen fermentation and its consequences on the animal should be taken into account.

References

  1. Br J Nutr. 1966;20(2):349-62 - PubMed
  2. J Dairy Sci. 1990 Sep;73(9):2470-9 - PubMed
  3. J Anim Sci. 1988 Feb;66(2):552-8 - PubMed
  4. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1972;38(3):281-7 - PubMed
  5. Reprod Nutr Dev. 1986;26(6):1295-303 - PubMed
  6. Appl Microbiol. 1969 May;17(5):695-700 - PubMed
  7. Proc Nutr Soc. 1972 Sep;31(2):127-34 - PubMed
  8. Proc Nutr Soc. 1993 Aug;52(2):345-56 - PubMed
  9. J Bacteriol. 1964 May;87(5):993-8 - PubMed
  10. J Anim Sci. 1984 Jun;58(6):1484-98 - PubMed
  11. Z Tierphysiol Tierernahr Futtermittelkd. 1976 Dec;37(6):322-9 - PubMed
  12. J Dairy Sci. 1965 Jul;48:991-3 - PubMed
  13. Arch Tierernahr. 1994;46(2):133-53 - PubMed
  14. World Rev Nutr Diet. 1969;11:240-82 - PubMed
  15. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1986;40:415-50 - PubMed
  16. J Anim Sci. 1989 Apr;67(4):1038-49 - PubMed
  17. J Dairy Sci. 1992 Jun;75(6):1736-44 - PubMed
  18. J Anim Sci. 1988 Jan;66(1):136-50 - PubMed
  19. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Feb;37(2):283-8 - PubMed
  20. J Anim Sci. 1980 Jul;51(1):170-9 - PubMed
  21. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1967 Jun 6;137(3):484-97 - PubMed
  22. J Anim Sci. 1981 Mar;52(3):628-34 - PubMed
  23. Br J Nutr. 1974 Jul;32(1):155-61 - PubMed
  24. J Anim Sci. 1974 Apr;38(4):908-14 - PubMed
  25. Proc Nutr Soc. 1972 Sep;31(2):165-70 - PubMed
  26. J Anim Sci. 1983 Jul;57(1):168-77 - PubMed
  27. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Dec;24(6):871-7 - PubMed
  28. Br J Nutr. 1975 Jul;34(1):25-44 - PubMed
  29. Z Tierphysiol Tierernahr Futtermittelkd. 1970 Mar;26(2):100-4 - PubMed
  30. J Anim Sci. 1985 Feb;60(2):544-50 - PubMed
  31. Br J Nutr. 1973 Sep;30(2):369-76 - PubMed
  32. Z Tierphysiol Tierernahr Futtermittelkd. 1970 Mar;26(2):91-100 - PubMed
  33. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Feb;54(2):502-6 - PubMed
  34. J Anim Sci. 1972 Mar;34(3):510-5 - PubMed
  35. J Dairy Sci. 1993 Aug;76(8):2213-21 - PubMed
  36. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Jul;42(1):12-9 - PubMed
  37. Proc Nutr Soc. 1987 Sep;46(3):415-21 - PubMed
  38. Z Tierphysiol Tierernahr Futtermittelkd. 1978 Jul;40(4):183-90 - PubMed
  39. Biochem J. 1967 Oct;105(1):271-7 - PubMed
  40. J Anim Sci. 1992 Jan;70(1):281-8 - PubMed
  41. Br J Nutr. 1981 Jul;46(1):131-48 - PubMed
  42. Br J Nutr. 1965;19(4):511-22 - PubMed
  43. J Dairy Sci. 1994 Nov;77(11):3426-31 - PubMed
  44. J Bacteriol. 1979 Jan;137(1):264-73 - PubMed
  45. J Dairy Sci. 1992 Aug;75(8):2165-75 - PubMed
  46. J Anim Sci. 1986 Jun;62(6):1737-41 - PubMed
  47. J Anim Sci. 1990 Jul;68(7):2142-9 - PubMed
  48. J Bacteriol. 1967 Jul;94(1):171-5 - PubMed
  49. J Anim Sci. 1983 Dec;57(6):1553-60 - PubMed
  50. Br J Nutr. 1986 Jul;56(1):181-92 - PubMed
  51. J Anim Sci. 1972 Nov;35(5):1064-8 - PubMed
  52. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Jan;55(1):1-6 - PubMed
  53. J Anim Sci. 1984 Jun;58(6):1518-27 - PubMed
  54. J Anim Sci. 1994 Jun;72(6):1630-5 - PubMed
  55. J Dairy Sci. 1987 Sep;70(9):1835-40 - PubMed
  56. Biochemistry. 1968 May;7(5):1707-13 - PubMed
  57. J Dairy Sci. 1971 Apr;54(4):536-40 - PubMed
  58. Reprod Nutr Dev. 1989;29(3):247-57 - PubMed
  59. J Appl Bacteriol. 1994 Jan;76(1):55-61 - PubMed
  60. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Sep;34(3):251-7 - PubMed
  61. J Anim Sci. 1994 Nov;72(11):2992-3003 - PubMed
  62. Br J Nutr. 1975 Nov;34(3):447-57 - PubMed
  63. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Jul;38(1):72-7 - PubMed
  64. Z Tierphysiol Tierernahr Futtermittelkd. 1974 Jun;33(3):121-5 - PubMed
  65. Arch Tierernahr. 1990 Apr;40(4):329-37 - PubMed
  66. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A. 1986 Dec;33(10):721-45 - PubMed
  67. Br J Nutr. 1982 May;47(3):565-76 - PubMed
  68. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Dec;54(12):2981-5 - PubMed
  69. J Anim Sci. 1990 May;68(5):1400-4 - PubMed
  70. Acta Vet Scand. 1977;18(1):108-21 - PubMed
  71. J Anim Sci. 1987 Jul;65(1):256-66 - PubMed
  72. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Nov;42(5):856-62 - PubMed
  73. Arch Tierernahr. 1994;46(1):61-76 - PubMed
  74. Arch Microbiol. 1989;151(5):399-406 - PubMed
  75. Br J Nutr. 1981 May;45(3):567-78 - PubMed

Publication Types