Front Pharmacol. 2012 Aug 23;3:155. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2012.00155. eCollection 2012.
Perlecan and the blood-brain barrier: beneficial proteolysis?.
Frontiers in pharmacology
Jill Roberts, Michael P Kahle, Gregory J Bix
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY, USA.
PMID: 22936915
PMCID: PMC3425914 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2012.00155
Abstract
The cerebral microvasculature is important for maintaining brain homeostasis. This is achieved via the blood-brain barrier (BBB), composed of endothelial cells with specialized tight junctions, astrocytes, and a basement membrane (BM). Prominent components of the BM extracellular matrix (ECM) include fibronectin, laminin, collagen IV, and perlecan, all of which regulate cellular processes via signal transduction through various cell membrane bound ECM receptors. Expression and proteolysis of these ECM components can be rapidly altered during pathological states of the central nervous system. In particular, proteolysis of perlecan, a heparan sulfate proteoglycan, occurs within hours following ischemia induced by experimental stroke. Proteolysis of ECM components following stroke results in the degradation of the BM and further disruption of the BBB. While it is clear that such proteolysis has negative consequences for the BBB, we propose that it also may lead to generation of ECM protein fragments, including the C-terminal domain V (DV) of perlecan, that potentially have a positive influence on other aspects of CNS health. Indeed, perlecan DV has been shown to be persistently generated after stroke and beneficial as a neuroprotective molecule and promoter of post-stroke brain repair. This mini-review will discuss beneficial roles of perlecan protein fragment generation within the brain during stroke.
Keywords: blood-brain barrier; brain; domain V; extracellular matrix; perlecan; stroke; vascular basement membrane
References
- Glycobiology. 2007 Sep;17(9):897-905 - PubMed
- Vascul Pharmacol. 2002 Jun;38(6):323-37 - PubMed
- Development. 1993 Dec;119(4):1079-91 - PubMed
- J Oral Pathol Med. 2011 Aug;40(7):552-9 - PubMed
- Trends Neurosci. 2001 Dec;24(12):719-25 - PubMed
- Curr Pharm Des. 2009;15(12):1277-94 - PubMed
- Neuroscience. 1998 Oct;86(4):1245-57 - PubMed
- J Clin Invest. 2011 Aug;121(8):3005-23 - PubMed
- Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006 Sep;26(9):1966-75 - PubMed
- Glia. 2011 Dec;59(12):1822-40 - PubMed
- Brain Res. 2012 Feb 15;1438:65-74 - PubMed
- J Neurochem. 2011 Nov;119(4):760-71 - PubMed
- Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14(16):1581-93 - PubMed
- Neuron. 2008 Jan 24;57(2):178-201 - PubMed
- Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2012 Mar;32(2):159-65 - PubMed
- J Cell Biol. 1999 Nov 29;147(5):1109-22 - PubMed
- Neurobiol Aging. 2012 Jul;33(7):1379-88 - PubMed
- Mol Cell Neurosci. 2008 May;38(1):43-52 - PubMed
- Glia. 2004 Mar;45(4):325-37 - PubMed
- Development. 2004 Apr;131(7):1619-28 - PubMed
- J Biol Chem. 1992 Jun 5;267(16):10931-4 - PubMed
- Dev Dyn. 1997 Oct;210(2):130-45 - PubMed
- Stroke. 2008 Jan;39(1):191-7 - PubMed
- Microsc Res Tech. 2008 May;71(5):339-48 - PubMed
- Stroke. 2011 Nov;42(11):3323-8 - PubMed
- J Neurochem. 2002 Oct;83(2):381-9 - PubMed
- Dev Neurobiol. 2011 Nov;71(11):1018-39 - PubMed
- Biochemistry. 2008 Oct 28;47(43):11174-83 - PubMed
- Stroke. 2004 Apr;35(4):998-1004 - PubMed
- Nat Genet. 1999 Nov;23(3):354-8 - PubMed
- FASEB J. 1990 Apr 1;4(6):1577-90 - PubMed
- J Cell Biol. 2004 Jul 5;166(1):97-109 - PubMed
- Dev Dyn. 2003 Jun;227(2):170-84 - PubMed
- BMC Dev Biol. 2007 Apr 05;7:29 - PubMed
- J Biol Chem. 2005 Feb 25;280(8):7080-7 - PubMed
- Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2013 Apr;39(3):270-83 - PubMed
Publication Types
Grant support