Display options
Share it on

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Feb 02;20:10. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-10.

Evaluation of performance of two different chest tubes with either a sharp or a blunt tip for thoracostomy in 100 human cadavers.

Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine

Clemens M Ortner, Kurt Ruetzler, Nikolaus Schaumann, Veit Lorenz, Peter Schellongowski, Ernst Schuster, Ramez M Salem, Michael Frass

Affiliations

  1. University of Washington, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 1811 East Lynn Street, Seattle, WA 98112 , USA.

PMID: 22300972 PMCID: PMC3395864 DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-10

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergent placement of a chest tube is a potentially life-saving procedure, but rate of misplacement and organ injury is up to 30%. In principle, chest tube insertion can be performed by using Trocar or Non-trocar techniques. If using trocar technique, two different chest tubes (equipped with sharp or blunt tip) are currently commercially available. This study was performed to detect any difference with respect to time until tube insertion, to success and to misplacement rate.

METHODS: Twenty emergency physicians performed five tube thoracostomies using both blunt and sharp tipped tube kits in 100 fresh human cadavers (100 thoracostomies with each kit). Time until tube insertion served as primary outcome. Complications and success rate were examined by pathological dissection and served as further outcomes parameters.

RESULTS: Difference in mean time until tube insertion (63 s vs. 59 s) was statistically not significant. In both groups, time for insertion decreased from the 1st to the 5th attempt and showed dependency on the cadaver's BMI and on the individual physician. Success rate differed between both groups (92% using blunt vs. 86% using sharp tipped kits) and injuries and misplacements occurred significantly more frequently using chest tubes with sharp tips (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION: Data suggest that chest drain insertion with trocars is associated with a 6-14% operator-related complication rate. No difference in average time could be found. However, misplacements and organ injuries occurred more frequently using sharp tips. Consequently, if using a trocar technique, the use of blunt tipped kits is recommended.

References

  1. Am J Surg. 1989 May;157(5):494-7 - PubMed
  2. Br J Hosp Med. 1997 Sep 17-30;58(6):248-52 - PubMed
  3. J Intensive Care Med. 1993 Feb-Mar;8(2):73-86 - PubMed
  4. Arch Surg. 1995 May;130(5):521-5; discussion 525-6 - PubMed
  5. J Trauma. 2001 Oct;51(4):677-82 - PubMed
  6. J Trauma. 2003 Mar;54(3):610-1 - PubMed
  7. Thorax. 2003 May;58 Suppl 2:ii53-9 - PubMed
  8. J Accid Emerg Med. 2000 Mar;17(2):111-4 - PubMed
  9. BMJ. 2009 Dec 02;339:b4923 - PubMed
  10. J Trauma. 1990 Jan;30(1):93-6 - PubMed
  11. Respirology. 2011 Feb;16(2):244-8 - PubMed
  12. Respirology. 2009 Nov;14(8):1092-7 - PubMed
  13. Anesthesiology. 2007 Jun;106(6):1112-9 - PubMed
  14. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Jan;90(1):54-7 - PubMed
  15. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Dec;31(6):760-8 - PubMed
  16. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Apr 06;5:21 - PubMed
  17. Helv Chir Acta. 1990 Oct;57(2):273-7 - PubMed
  18. J Emerg Med. 1995 Mar-Apr;13(2):155-63 - PubMed
  19. Can J Surg. 2007 Dec;50(6):450-8 - PubMed
  20. ANZ J Surg. 2004 Jun;74(6):420-3 - PubMed
  21. Injury. 2008 Jan;39(1):9-20 - PubMed
  22. Resuscitation. 2007 Feb;72(2):226-33 - PubMed
  23. Emerg Med J. 2005 Jan;22(1):8-16 - PubMed
  24. Resuscitation. 2007 Jan;72(1):11-25 - PubMed
  25. J Emerg Med. 2002 Jul;23(1):89-95 - PubMed
  26. Surg Clin North Am. 1989 Feb;69(1):41-6 - PubMed
  27. Emerg Med J. 2003 Jul;20(4):383-4 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types