Display options
Share it on

Health Policy Plan. 2012 Oct;27(7):541-54. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czr083. Epub 2012 Jan 25.

Community accountability at peripheral health facilities: a review of the empirical literature and development of a conceptual framework.

Health policy and planning

Sassy Molyneux, Martin Atela, Vibian Angwenyi, Catherine Goodman

Affiliations

  1. Kenya Medical Research Institute/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O. Box 230, Kilifi, Kenya. [email protected]

PMID: 22279082 PMCID: PMC3465752 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czr083

Abstract

Public accountability has re-emerged as a top priority for health systems all over the world, and particularly in developing countries where governments have often failed to provide adequate public sector services for their citizens. One approach to strengthening public accountability is through direct involvement of clients, users or the general public in health delivery, here termed 'community accountability'. The potential benefits of community accountability, both as an end in itself and as a means of improving health services, have led to significant resources being invested by governments and non-governmental organizations. Data are now needed on the implementation and impact of these initiatives on the ground. A search of PubMed using a systematic approach, supplemented by a hand search of key websites, identified 21 papers from low- or middle-income countries describing at least one measure to enhance community accountability that was linked with peripheral facilities. Mechanisms covered included committees and groups (n = 19), public report cards (n = 1) and patients' rights charters (n = 1). In this paper we summarize the data presented in these papers, including impact, and factors influencing impact, and conclude by commenting on the methods used, and the issues they raise. We highlight that the international interest in community accountability mechanisms linked to peripheral facilities has not been matched by empirical data, and present a conceptual framework and a set of ideas that might contribute to future studies.

References

  1. Health Policy Plan. 1996 Mar;11(1):93-100 - PubMed
  2. World Hosp Health Serv. 2009;45(1):4-8 - PubMed
  3. J Public Health (Oxf). 2007 Jun;29(2):147-56 - PubMed
  4. Health Policy Plan. 2003 Dec;18(4):399-410 - PubMed
  5. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Feb-Mar;46(4-5):475-94 - PubMed
  6. Health Policy Plan. 2002 Mar;17(1):14-31 - PubMed
  7. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2004 Jan-Mar;19(1):3-22 - PubMed
  8. BMC Public Health. 2007 Jan 26;7:14 - PubMed
  9. Health Policy Plan. 2008 Sep;23(5):291-3 - PubMed
  10. Health Policy Plan. 2001 Dec;16 Suppl 2:52-60 - PubMed
  11. Health Policy Plan. 2006 Mar;21(2):101-9 - PubMed
  12. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2003 Oct-Dec;18(4):329-42 - PubMed
  13. Int J Health Plann Manage. 1996 Oct-Dec;11(4):345-58 - PubMed
  14. Health Policy Plan. 2004 Oct;19 Suppl 1:i78-i86 - PubMed
  15. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2004 Jan-Mar;19(1):23-41 - PubMed
  16. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Nov;47(10):1513-27 - PubMed
  17. Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jul;59(1):157-62 - PubMed
  18. Health Policy Plan. 2004 Nov;19(6):371-9 - PubMed
  19. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2007 Jul-Sep;22(3):183-203 - PubMed
  20. Health Policy Plan. 2008 Sep;23(5):294-307 - PubMed
  21. Soc Sci Med. 2002 Apr;54(8):1255-66 - PubMed
  22. Health Policy Plan. 2008 Sep;23(5):308-17 - PubMed
  23. Health Place. 2003 Mar;9(1):45-53 - PubMed
  24. Health Policy Plan. 2002 Sep;17(3):304-13 - PubMed
  25. Health Policy Plan. 2002 Jun;17(2):202-6 - PubMed
  26. Soc Sci Med. 1988;26(9):931-40 - PubMed
  27. Health Policy Plan. 2006 Jan;21(1):27-39 - PubMed
  28. Health Policy. 2001 Oct;58(1):37-67 - PubMed
  29. J Public Health Med. 2002 Dec;24(4):246-51 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support