Display options
Share it on

OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2010;30(3):111-121. doi: 10.3928/15394492-20090518-01.

Factor Structure, Reliability and Convergent Validity of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey for Older Adults.

OTJR : occupation, participation and health

Aaron M Eakman, Mike Carlson, Florence Clark

Affiliations

  1. Occupational Therapy Program, Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Kasiska College of Health Professions, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, USA.

PMID: 21927592 PMCID: PMC3172818 DOI: 10.3928/15394492-20090518-01

Abstract

This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey (EMAS) (Goldberg, Brintnell, & Goldberg, 2002) in a sample of older adults living in the greater Los Angeles area. The EMAS evidenced moderate test-retest reliability (r = .56) and good internal consistency (α = .89). Exploratory factor analysis (principal components) discerned a two-component structure within the EMAS, indicative of Personal-Competence and Social-Experiential meaning. The EMAS demonstrated theoretically predicted zero-order correlations with measures of meaning and purpose in life, depressive symptomology, life satisfaction, and health-related quality of life. Regression analyses discerned that purpose and meaning in life consistently predicted the EMAS and its components. Furthermore, persons reporting greater levels of Social-Experiential relative to Personal-Competence meaning had the lowest levels of physical health-related quality of life. This study offers initial evidence in support of the EMAS as a valid measure of meaningful activity in older adults.

References

  1. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2004 Jan;74(1):72-88 - PubMed
  2. Psychol Rep. 1995 Apr;76(2):482 - PubMed
  3. Am J Occup Ther. 1999 Nov-Dec;53(6):547-58 - PubMed
  4. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1980 Oct;28(10):466-71 - PubMed
  5. Psychol Aging. 1997 Dec;12(4):600-9 - PubMed
  6. Am J Occup Ther. 1998 May;52(5):326-36 - PubMed
  7. Am J Occup Ther. 1991 Apr;45(4):300-10 - PubMed
  8. Am J Occup Ther. 2001 Mar-Apr;55(2):138-46 - PubMed
  9. Can J Occup Ther. 2004 Dec;71(5):296-305 - PubMed
  10. Psychol Aging. 1994 Jun;9(2):265-73 - PubMed
  11. Gerontologist. 1989 Apr;29(2):183-90 - PubMed
  12. Psychol Aging. 1997 Sep;12(3):489-502 - PubMed
  13. Med Care. 1993 Mar;31(3):247-63 - PubMed
  14. Am Psychol. 1996 Jul;51(7):702-14 - PubMed
  15. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1988;26(4):303-14 - PubMed
  16. Br J Psychol. 1992 Feb;83 ( Pt 1):133-45 - PubMed
  17. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78 - PubMed
  18. Psychol Aging. 1992 Sep;7(3):331-8 - PubMed
  19. Am J Occup Ther. 1999 Jan-Feb;53(1):91-100 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support