Display options
Share it on

Ann Emerg Med. 1991 Apr;20(4):362-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81655-5.

Dispatcher-assisted telephone CPR: common delays and time standards for delivery.

Annals of emergency medicine

L L Culley, J J Clark, M S Eisenberg, M P Larsen

Affiliations

  1. Center for Evaluation of Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Medical Services Division, Seattle, Washington 98104.

PMID: 2003662 DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81655-5

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of bystander CPR before and after implementation of a telephone CPR program in King County; to determine the reasons for dispatcher delays in identifying patients in cardiac arrest in delivering CPR instructions over the telephone; and to suggest time standards for delivery of the telephone CPR message.

DESIGN: An ongoing cardiac arrest surveillance system to calculate the annual bystander CPR rates from 1976 through 1988. Two hundred sixty-seven taped recordings of calls reporting cardiac arrests to nine emergency dispatch centers during 1988 were reviewed and timed.

SETTING: King County, Washington, excluding the city of Seattle.

PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred sixty-seven persons with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests receiving emergency medical services. Arrests in doctors' offices, clinics, or nursing homes were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS: Dispatcher-assisted telephone CPR.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The rate of bystander CPR increased from 32% (1976 through 1981) to 54% (1982 through 1988) after implementation of the dispatcher-assisted telephone CPR program, although an increase in survival could not be demonstrated. The median time for dispatchers to identify the problem was 75 seconds; to deliver the early protocols, 19 seconds; to deliver the ventilation instructions, 25 seconds; and to deliver compression instructions, 30 seconds. The total time to deliver the entire CPR message was 2.3 minutes. The most frequent cause for delay was unnecessary questions (57%) with questions about patient age asked most frequently (32%). Other causes included the caller not being near the patient (29%) and deviations from protocol (22%).

CONCLUSION: In a metropolitan emergency medical services system, a dispatcher-assisted telephone CPR program was associated with an increase in bystander CPR. Delays in proper delivery of telephone CPR can be minimized through training.

Similar articles

Show all 15 similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

Publication Types