Display options
Share it on

Image J Nurs Sch. 1991;23(2):119-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1991.tb00655.x.

Comparative analysis of conceptualizations and theories of caring.

Image--the journal of nursing scholarship

J M Morse, J Bottorff, W Neander, S Solberg

PMID: 2060951 DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1991.tb00655.x

Abstract

We delineated and compared various definitions of caring according to the five major conceptualizations of caring: caring as a human trait; caring as a moral imperative; caring as an affect; caring as an interpersonal interaction; and caring as an intervention. The implications of these diverse conceptualizations of caring for nursing practice are identified, and the commonalities, strengths and weaknesses discussed. It is concluded that caring is relatively undeveloped as a concept, has not been clearly explicated and often lacks relevance for nursing practice.

Similar articles

Devine K.
AWHONN Lifelines. 2001 Jun-Jul;5(3):12. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6356.2001.tb01271.x.
PMID: 11982253

Levine JM.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jan;70(1):308. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17576. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
PMID: 34796910

Bartos S.
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2020 Sep;32(3):ix-x. doi: 10.1016/j.cnc.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
PMID: 32773187

McKendry JB, Perkin RL.
Can Fam Physician. 1979 Dec;25:1429-32.
PMID: 20469293

Show all 20 similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support

LinkOut - more resources