Cite
Nassenstein K, Breuckmann F, Hunold P, et al. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: comparison between a Gd-BOPTA- and a Gd-DTPA-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo sequence and a non-contrast-enhanced steady-state free-precession sequence. Acta Radiol. 2009;50(4):406-11doi: 10.1080/02841850902838066.
Nassenstein, K., Breuckmann, F., Hunold, P., Barkhausen, J., & Schlosser, T. (2009). Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: comparison between a Gd-BOPTA- and a Gd-DTPA-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo sequence and a non-contrast-enhanced steady-state free-precession sequence. Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987), 50(4), 406-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850902838066
Nassenstein, K, et al. "Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: comparison between a Gd-BOPTA- and a Gd-DTPA-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo sequence and a non-contrast-enhanced steady-state free-precession sequence." Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) vol. 50,4 (2009): 406-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850902838066
Nassenstein K, Breuckmann F, Hunold P, Barkhausen J, Schlosser T. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: comparison between a Gd-BOPTA- and a Gd-DTPA-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo sequence and a non-contrast-enhanced steady-state free-precession sequence. Acta Radiol. 2009 May;50(4):406-11. doi: 10.1080/02841850902838066. PMID: 19308763.
Copy
Download .nbib