Display options
Cite
Cappell MS. The effect of Nazism on medical progress in gastroenterology: the inefficiency of evil. Dig Dis Sci. 2006;51(6):1137-58doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-8023-x.
Cappell, M. S. (2006). The effect of Nazism on medical progress in gastroenterology: the inefficiency of evil. Digestive diseases and sciences, 51(6), 1137-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-8023-x
Cappell, Mitchell S. "The effect of Nazism on medical progress in gastroenterology: the inefficiency of evil." Digestive diseases and sciences vol. 51,6 (2006): 1137-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-8023-x
Cappell MS. The effect of Nazism on medical progress in gastroenterology: the inefficiency of evil. Dig Dis Sci. 2006 Jun;51(6):1137-58. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-8023-x. PMID: 16865585.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Dig Dis Sci. 2006 Jun;51(6):1137-58. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-8023-x.

The effect of Nazism on medical progress in gastroenterology: the inefficiency of evil.

Digestive diseases and sciences

Mitchell S Cappell

Affiliations

  1. Gastroenterology Fellowship Training Program, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19141, USA.

PMID: 16865585 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-006-8023-x

Abstract

While Nazism is almost universally recognized as a great evil, control of science and medicine by the totalitarian Nazi state might be viewed as increasing efficiency. Scientific methods are applied to semiquantitatively analyze the effects of Nazism on medical progress in gastroenterology to document its pernicious effects, and to honor outstanding gastroenterologists persecuted or murdered by the Nazis. This is a retrospective, quasi-case-controlled study. To disprove the null hypothesis that Nazism was efficient, retarded progress in gastroenterology is demonstrated by (1) enumerating the loss to Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1944 due to violent death, incarceration, or forced exile of key researchers in gastroenterology, defined by authorship of at least one book or 10 articles in peer-reviewed journals or other outstanding scholarship; (2) demonstrating a statistically significantly greater loss in Nazi Germany than in non-Nazi (Weimar German Republic from 1921 to 1932) or anti-Nazi (democratic America from 1933 to 1944) control groups; and (3) demonstrating that each loss was directly due to Nazism (murder, incarceration, or exile due to documented threat of violence/death or revocation of medical license). Sources of error in analyzing events from 70 years ago are described. Nazi Germany and Nazi-occupied Europe gained 0 and lost 53 key gastroenterology researchers, including 32 lost due to forced exile, 11 murdered by the Nazis, 5 lost due to suicide under threat of violence, 3 in hiding from the Gestapo, and 2 for other reasons. Fifty-two of the gastroenterologists were persecuted solely because they were Jewish or of Jewish descent and one because he was a Christian anti-Nazi Polish patriot. Particularly severe losses occurred in endoscopy. The loss in Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1944 was significantly greater than that in non-Nazi Germany and Austria from 1921 to 1932 (53 versus 4; odds ratio = 25.27; 95% CI: 9.01-70.48; P < 0.0001) and was significantly greater than that in anti-Nazi America from 1933 to 1944 (53 versus 0; odds ratio > 104.0; 95% CI: 17.62-608.95; P < 0.0001). Lost physicians in Nazi Germany (with reasons for loss) included Ismar Boas, the father of modern gastroenterology (suicide after medical license revoked); Hans Popper, the father of hepatopathology (fled impending arrest); Rudolph Nissen, the father of antireflux surgery (fled after job dismissal); Rudolph Schindler, the father of semiflexible endoscopy (fled after incarceration); Heinrich Lamm, the first to experimentally demonstrate fiberoptic transmission and the first to suggest its applicability for gastroscopy (fled after medical license revoked); Hermann Strauss, a pioneer in rigid sigmoidoscopy (suicide in a concentration camp); A.A.H. van den Bergh, who discovered the van den Bergh reaction to differentiate indirect from direct bilirubin (died in hiding in Nazi-occupied Holland); and Kurt Isselbacher, subsequently the Chief of Gastroenterology at Harvard Medical School (fled in childhood after a grandfather murdered by Nazis). All four refugee physicians who were reexposed to Nazi domination, after a regime change in their country of refuge, fled again or committed suicide. The Nazi damage to German and Austrian gastroenterology was immense, e.g., 13 of 14 major international discoveries in diagnostic gastroscopy were made by Germans or Austrians before the Third Reich, versus only 1 of 8 subsequently (odds ratio = 91; 95% CI: 3.58-13,887.61; P < 0.001). Eighteen (34%) of the persecuted physicians immigrated to America, thereby contributing to the postwar flourishing of American gastroenterology, particularly gastrointestinal endoscopy. In conclusion, the Third Reich severely retarded and reversed medical progress in gastroenterology in Germany. The inefficiency of Nazism, as herein documented, is attributable to the Nazi commitment of so much human, economic, and social resources to the military to wage wars of aggression, to the secret police (Gestapo) to pursue and exterminate perceived internal enemies, and to the Party to control and regiment civil society. Most inefficient is the incarceration, exile, or murder of Germany's most trained physicians and talented researchers because of religion or race, sociological parameters that are irrelevant to productivity. Intimidation and repression stifle scientific scholarship and creativity. This work disproves the myth of the efficiency of Nazism, and like tyrannies, by the novel application of semiquantitative scientific methodology to assess causality in medical history.

References

  1. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1992;35(4):243-52 - PubMed
  2. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1956 May 18;86(Suppl 20):590-2 - PubMed
  3. J Clin Invest. 2001 Oct;108(7):s15-s19 - PubMed
  4. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 May;170(5):455-8 - PubMed
  5. Korot. 2001;15:9-45 - PubMed
  6. Ann Surg. 1968 May;167(5):752-6 - PubMed
  7. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1968 Nov 15;93(46):2237-8 - PubMed
  8. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1974 Mar 15;99(11):496-7 - PubMed
  9. Gastrointest Endosc. 1984 Feb;30(1):1-5 - PubMed
  10. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2003;33(1):54-66 - PubMed
  11. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1960 Jan 8;72:13-5 - PubMed
  12. Lancet. 1980 Mar 22;1(8169):629-31 - PubMed
  13. Kinderarztl Prax. 1990 Nov;58(11):587-92 - PubMed
  14. Endoscopy. 1984 Jan;16(1):16-9 - PubMed
  15. Gastroenterology. 1979 Aug;77(2):354-61 - PubMed
  16. Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Feb;30(1):37-42 - PubMed
  17. Gastroenterology. 1993 Feb;104(2):337-42 - PubMed
  18. Lancet. 1961 May 20;1(7186):1074-8 - PubMed
  19. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 Jun;93(6):862-71 - PubMed
  20. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1996 Dec 13;121(50):1561-6 - PubMed
  21. Lancet. 1978 Mar 4;1(8062):459-63 - PubMed
  22. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Feb;69(2):651-4 - PubMed
  23. Gastroenterologia. 1958;90(1):49-53 - PubMed
  24. Z Gesamte Hyg. 1985 May;31(5):306-9 - PubMed
  25. Brain Pathol. 1991 Jan;1(2):125-31 - PubMed
  26. Med Bull (Ann Arbor). 1957 May;23(5):178-80 - PubMed
  27. Ann Intern Med. 1985 May;102(5):721 - PubMed
  28. Urology. 1974 Jan;3(1):119-23 - PubMed
  29. Medizinhist J. 1986;21(3-4):288-307 - PubMed
  30. Ann Intern Med. 1995 May 15;122(10):789-92 - PubMed
  31. Science. 1956 Apr 13;123(3198):635-6 - PubMed
  32. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1988 Feb;10(1):16-24 - PubMed
  33. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1993 Sep 25;137(39):1982-7 - PubMed
  34. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 Nov-Dec;37(6):643-8 - PubMed
  35. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 Mar-Apr;37(2 Suppl):S27-56 - PubMed
  36. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997 Jan 4;141(1):9-17 - PubMed
  37. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2000 Mar;29(1):223-63, viii - PubMed
  38. N Engl J Med. 1990 May 17;322(20):1435-40 - PubMed
  39. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 Mar-Apr;37(2 Suppl):S1-26 - PubMed
  40. Ann Surg. 1895 Apr;21(4):468-78 - PubMed
  41. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1951 Jun;87(6):844-62 - PubMed
  42. Mt Sinai J Med. 1973 Nov-Dec;40(6):716-9 - PubMed
  43. Gastrointest Endosc. 1970 Nov;17(2):59-62 - PubMed
  44. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1960 Oct 14;72:756-61 - PubMed
  45. Int J Dermatol. 1993 Jan;32(1):71-4 - PubMed
  46. Internist (Berl). 1969 Mar;10(3):106-9 - PubMed
  47. JAMA. 1967 Sep 18;201(12 ):943-5 - PubMed
  48. Surgery. 1999 Mar;125(3):347-53 - PubMed
  49. Med Law. 1992;11(1-2):33-6 - PubMed
  50. N Engl J Med. 2001 Jan 18;344(3):232-3 - PubMed
  51. Harefuah. 1993 Mar 15;124(6):375-8 - PubMed
  52. Harefuah. 1950 Nov 15;39(10):120-1 - PubMed
  53. Lancet. 1968 Sep 14;2(7568):626-8 - PubMed
  54. N Engl J Med. 1975 Jan 2;292(1):17-22 - PubMed
  55. Ann Intern Med. 1983 Apr;98(4):437-41 - PubMed
  56. Am Surg. 1995 May;61(5):468 - PubMed
  57. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl. 1959;Suppl 56:1-60 - PubMed
  58. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993 Oct;88(10):1684-99 - PubMed
  59. Endoscopy. 1980 Sep;12(5):241-4 - PubMed
  60. Bull Hist Med. 1972 Mar-Apr;46(2):150-70 - PubMed
  61. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol. 1968;52:574-80 - PubMed
  62. Z Gastroenterol. 2001 Oct;39(10):853-60 - PubMed
  63. Hepatology. 1989 May;9(5):669-74 - PubMed
  64. Pol Tyg Lek (Wars). 1958 May 26;13(21):810-1 - PubMed
  65. Neurology. 1992 Nov;42(11):2214-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types