Display options
Share it on

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Aug;26(7):1772-80.

Effects of carotid or vertebrobasilar stent placement on cerebral perfusion and cognition.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology

Roham Moftakhar, Aquilla S Turk, David B Niemann, Sayed Hussain, Sharad Rajpal, Thomas Cook, Madeleine Geraghty, Beverly Aagaard-Kienitz, Patrick A Turski, George C Newman

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA.

PMID: 16091529 PMCID: PMC7975161

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There are no well-established physiologic or neuropsychological criteria for identifying which patients with stenosis of the cervicocerebral vessels are at high risk of stroke or cognitive impairment. Our purpose was to evaluate changes in cognitive performance and cerebral perfusion associated with endovascular stent placement of the cervicocerebral vessels.

METHODS: A consecutive series of 20 patients, 31-88 years of age, who underwent 21 stent procedures for arterial stenosis (10 extracranial carotid stents [ECS], four intracranial carotid stents [ICS], and seven extra- or intracranial vertebrobasilar stents [VBS]) was investigated retrospectively. All patients were evaluated with CT or MR perfusion studies both before and after stent placement. Cognitive response after stent placement was evaluated by using an informant questionnaire.

RESULTS: In patients with anterior circulation stenoses (ECS and ICS group), 11 of 14 (79%) had a baseline perfusion abnormality and all 11 patients showed improved perfusion after stent placement. Four of seven (57%) patients with posterior circulation stenoses (VBS group) had a baseline perfusion abnormality and two of the four patients showed improved perfusion after stent placement. Degree of stenosis was the strongest predictor of the presence of a baseline perfusion abnormality (P = .03). Fifteen of 19 (79%) of the patients showed improved cognitive scores after stent placement. Among patients with improvement in perfusion after stent placement, 11 of 13 (85%) had improved cognitive scores. Improved perfusion after stent placement was a significant predictor of cognitive improvement (P = .04). Patients who were stented on an elective basis demonstrated greater improvement in cognition as compared with patients stented urgently (P = .01).

CONCLUSION: Endovascular stent placement of the cervicocerebral vessels can safely and effectively resolve cerebral perfusion abnormalities. Improvement in perfusion parameters is associated with cognitive improvement. Larger, blinded, prospective studies are needed to confirm these preliminary observations.

References

  1. Ann Neurol. 1986 Jul;20(1):13-9 - PubMed
  2. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004 May;15(5):421-2 - PubMed
  3. Neurology. 1995 Aug;45(8):1488-93 - PubMed
  4. Stroke. 1994 Sep;25(9):1784-7 - PubMed
  5. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1493-501 - PubMed
  6. J Endovasc Surg. 1998 Nov;5(4):293-304 - PubMed
  7. Med J Aust. 1990 Aug 20;153(4):192-6 - PubMed
  8. Eur Neurol. 2001;46(2):63-9 - PubMed
  9. Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 1984;234(1):69-73 - PubMed
  10. Radiologe. 1999 Feb;39(2):125-34 - PubMed
  11. Psychol Med. 1989 Nov;19(4):1015-22 - PubMed
  12. Circulation. 1997 Jan 21;95(2):376-81 - PubMed
  13. JAMA. 1995 May 10;273(18):1421-8 - PubMed
  14. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98 - PubMed
  15. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004 Aug;25(7):1162-7 - PubMed
  16. Stroke. 1999 Dec;30(12):2671-8 - PubMed
  17. Radiology. 2003 May;227(2):593-600 - PubMed
  18. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999 Oct;20(9):1688-94 - PubMed
  19. Lancet Neurol. 2003 Feb;2(2):89-98 - PubMed
  20. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Jan;194(1 Suppl):S9-14 - PubMed
  21. J Clin Psychol. 1977 Jan;33(1):215-20 - PubMed
  22. Stroke. 2001 Dec 1;32(12):2782-6 - PubMed
  23. Arch Neurol. 2000 Nov;57(11):1625-30 - PubMed
  24. Stroke. 2003 Apr;34(4):1084-104 - PubMed
  25. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 Oct;24(9):1869-75 - PubMed
  26. Surg Neurol. 2003 Jun;59(6):455-60; discussion 460-3 - PubMed
  27. Psychol Med. 1994 Feb;24(1):145-53 - PubMed
  28. N Engl J Med. 1985 Nov 7;313(19):1191-200 - PubMed
  29. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;75(6):847-51 - PubMed
  30. J Vasc Surg. 2001 Feb;33(2):329-33 - PubMed
  31. N Engl J Med. 1991 Aug 15;325(7):445-53 - PubMed
  32. Neurology. 2004 Mar 9;62(5):695-701 - PubMed
  33. Stroke. 2001 Mar;32(3):728-34 - PubMed
  34. Ann Neurol. 1991 Mar;29(3):231-40 - PubMed
  35. Circulation. 2001 Jan 30;103(4):532-7 - PubMed
  36. Neuroepidemiology. 2004 Jan-Apr;23(1-2):23-32 - PubMed
  37. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004 Jan;25(1):97-107 - PubMed
  38. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 May;22(5):905-14 - PubMed
  39. Neuroradiology. 2002 Aug;44(8):706-10 - PubMed
  40. Stroke. 1996 Apr;27(4):612-6 - PubMed
  41. Semin Vasc Surg. 2000 Jun;13(2):139-43 - PubMed
  42. Arch Neurol. 1980 Dec;37(12):743-8 - PubMed
  43. Stroke. 1997 May;28(5):899-905 - PubMed
  44. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Mar;23(3):430-6 - PubMed
  45. Stroke. 1997 Oct;28(10):2084-93 - PubMed
  46. Psychol Med. 1991 Aug;21(3):785-90 - PubMed
  47. Radiology. 1996 Dec;201(3):627-36 - PubMed
  48. Stroke. 2004 Jun;35(6):1388-92 - PubMed
  49. Lancet. 1998 May 9;351(9113):1379-87 - PubMed
  50. Arch Neurol. 2004 Jan;61(1):39-43 - PubMed
  51. J Endovasc Ther. 2000 Oct;7(5):345-52 - PubMed
  52. Radiology. 2004 Apr;231(1):45-9 - PubMed
  53. Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Oct;5(5):457-8 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types