Display options
Cite
Estop AM, Levinson F, Cieply K, et al. The segregation of a translocation t(1;4) in two male carriers heterozygous for the translocation. Hum Genet. 1992;89(4):425-9doi: 10.1007/BF00194315.
Estop, A. M., Levinson, F., Cieply, K., & Vankirk, V. (1992). The segregation of a translocation t(1;4) in two male carriers heterozygous for the translocation. Human genetics, 89(4), 425-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00194315
Estop, A M, et al. "The segregation of a translocation t(1;4) in two male carriers heterozygous for the translocation." Human genetics vol. 89,4 (1992): 425-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00194315
Estop AM, Levinson F, Cieply K, Vankirk V. The segregation of a translocation t(1;4) in two male carriers heterozygous for the translocation. Hum Genet. 1992 Jun;89(4):425-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00194315. PMID: 1618491.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Hum Genet. 1992 Jun;89(4):425-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00194315.

The segregation of a translocation t(1;4) in two male carriers heterozygous for the translocation.

Human genetics

A M Estop, F Levinson, K Cieply, V Vankirk

Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Genetics, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh 15224.

PMID: 1618491 DOI: 10.1007/BF00194315

Abstract

We examined the meiotic segregation pattern of a t(1;4)(p36.2;q31.3) reciprocal translocation in two male cousins heterozygous for the translocation. The wife of subject 1 had four recognized spontaneous abortions and two carrier daughters, and the wife of subject 2 had three recognized spontaneous abortions and no live-born children. The results showed that subject 1 had an imbalance rate of 54% and subject 2 had an imbalance rate of 61% with respect to the translocation. This was not statistically different (P = 0.3174) and the 95% confidence intervals overlapped for each segregation type. The sex ratio of X- and Y-bearing sperm was not statistically different than the expected 50%. The rate of structural abnormalities was 11.3% in subject 1 and 17.8% in subject 2. Both of these values were above the range of control subjects in our lab, but only subject 2's value fell outside the 95% confidence interval for the control population.

Similar articles

References

  1. Am J Med Genet. 1984 Sep;19(1):137-59 - PubMed
  2. Hum Genet. 1990 Jan;84(2):159-62 - PubMed
  3. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1983;35(4):252-6 - PubMed
  4. Hum Genet. 1990 Nov;86(1):33-9 - PubMed
  5. Prenat Diagn. 1984 Spring;4 Spec No:45-67 - PubMed
  6. Hum Reprod. 1990 Jul;5(5):606-9 - PubMed
  7. Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Jun;38(6):954-64 - PubMed
  8. Hum Genet. 1991 Aug;87(4):447-51 - PubMed
  9. Fertil Steril. 1983 Apr;39(4):536-41 - PubMed
  10. Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Feb;38(2):197-208 - PubMed
  11. Nature. 1978 Aug 31;274(5674):911-3 - PubMed
  12. Am J Hum Genet. 1989 Apr;44(4):464-73 - PubMed
  13. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1989;51(1-4):452-8 - PubMed
  14. Hum Genet. 1984;66(2-3):193-201 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

LinkOut - more resources