Display options
Share it on

Sports Med. 2005;35(4):271-83. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200535040-00001.

Cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors : beneficial or detrimental for athletes with acute musculoskeletal injuries?.

Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)

Stuart J Warden

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Indiana University, Indianapolis, 46202, USA. [email protected]

PMID: 15831058 DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200535040-00001

Abstract

The major goal of clinicians when treating acute musculoskeletal injuries is to return athletes to their pre-injury level of function, ideally in the shortest time possible and without compromising tissue-level healing. In this regard, a commonly used intervention is the taking of NSAIDs. These are used to limit the amount and duration of inflammation, and to control pain. While NSAIDs have become synonymous with the management of acute musculoskeletal injuries, their efficacy has yet to be proven. This is of particular concern in view of recent research investigating the latest class of NSAIDs - selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors (COXIBs). COXIBs were developed to reduce the adverse gastrointestinal (GI) effects of traditional NSAIDs. While they have beneficial anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties, and appear to facilitate earlier return to function following acute injury, the effect of COXIBs on tissue-level healing is currently unknown. In experimental animal models of acute injury, COXIBs have been shown to be detrimental to tissue-level repair. Specifically, they have been shown to impair mechanical strength return following acute injury to bone, ligament and tendon. Clinically, this may have implications for ongoing morbidity and future injury susceptibility. However, the current animal studies have limited translation to the clinical setting, particularly because of significant limitations relating to drug use and dosage in these studies. There is currently no randomised, controlled trial evidence of the tissue-level effects of COXIBs on acute musculoskeletal injuries. In addition to questions relating to the effect of COXIBs on tissue-level healing, further questions regarding the use of these agents have been raised given a recent link being shown between one COXIB (rofecoxib) and an increased risk for adverse cardiovascular events. Whether this finding is related to the individual properties of rofecoxib or is a class phenomenon is the subject of ongoing investigation. However, in light of the potential risks associated with using COXIBs, an acceptable and possibly safer alternative in the management of acute musculoskeletal injuries may be to use traditional NSAIDs. Traditional NSAIDs do carry the potential for greater adverse GI effects and their clinical effects on tissue-level healing remain relatively unknown. However, they do not appear to be associated with adverse cardiovascular effects, and they are effective pain relievers and cheaper alternatives.

References

  1. BMJ. 2002 Sep 21;325(7365):619 - PubMed
  2. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2003 Jun;13(3):150-4 - PubMed
  3. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980 Aug;51(4):595-600 - PubMed
  4. Cell. 1995 Nov 3;83(3):473-82 - PubMed
  5. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002 Oct;73(5):489-90 - PubMed
  6. Drug Metab Dispos. 2000 Mar;28(3):308-14 - PubMed
  7. Nature. 1995 Nov 23;378(6555):406-9 - PubMed
  8. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004 Nov;3(11):899-901 - PubMed
  9. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003 Aug;74(4):465-9 - PubMed
  10. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2002 Sep;70(1-2):161-8 - PubMed
  11. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999 Aug;290(2):551-60 - PubMed
  12. Drug Metab Dispos. 2000 Oct;28(10):1244-54 - PubMed
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jan 5;96(1):272-7 - PubMed
  14. Biochem Pharmacol. 1995 Nov 9;50(10):1535-42 - PubMed
  15. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2002 Feb;67(2):121-35 - PubMed
  16. Sports Med. 1999 Dec;28(6):383-8 - PubMed
  17. JAMA. 2000 Sep 13;284(10):1247-55 - PubMed
  18. Clin J Sport Med. 2004 Jul;14(4):225-31 - PubMed
  19. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004 May-Jun;12(3):139-43 - PubMed
  20. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003 Nov;2(11):879-90 - PubMed
  21. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Mar;53(3):255-65 - PubMed
  22. J Clin Invest. 2001 Jul;108(1):7-13 - PubMed
  23. Biochem Pharmacol. 1998 Jan 15;55(2):105-11 - PubMed
  24. J Bone Miner Res. 2002 Jun;17(6):977-8 - PubMed
  25. J Bone Miner Res. 2002 Jun;17(6):963-76 - PubMed
  26. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001 Feb;296(2):558-66 - PubMed
  27. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1709-11 - PubMed
  28. Drug Saf. 1990;5 Suppl 1:40-5 - PubMed
  29. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 May;56(2):167-74 - PubMed
  30. JAMA. 2003 Nov 12;290(18):2411-8 - PubMed
  31. Lancet. 2004 May 29;363(9423):1751-6 - PubMed
  32. Genomics. 1993 Feb;15(2):458-60 - PubMed
  33. Drug Metab Dispos. 2000 May;28(5):514-21 - PubMed
  34. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Jul;82(5):655-8 - PubMed
  35. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jun 22;96(13):7563-8 - PubMed
  36. Clin Sports Med. 1995 Apr;14(2):353-410 - PubMed
  37. Clin Sports Med. 1992 Jul;11(3):625-44 - PubMed
  38. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 2001 Aug 25;760(1):83-90 - PubMed
  39. Sports Med. 2003;33(3):177-85 - PubMed
  40. Am J Sports Med. 2004 Oct-Nov;32(7):1743-7 - PubMed
  41. Adv Immunol. 1996;62:167-215 - PubMed
  42. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000 Mar;38(3):225-42 - PubMed
  43. Am J Med. 1998 May;104(5):413-21 - PubMed
  44. J Biol Chem. 1999 Aug 13;274(33):22903-6 - PubMed
  45. AACN Clin Issues. 2004 Jan-Mar;15(1):3-17 - PubMed
  46. J Clin Invest. 2001 Jun;107(11):1347-51 - PubMed
  47. Am J Sports Med. 2001 Nov-Dec;29(6):801-5 - PubMed
  48. BMJ. 2002 Jan 12;324(7329):71-86 - PubMed
  49. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2004 Mar;3(2):131-6 - PubMed
  50. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Apr 1;23(7):834-8 - PubMed
  51. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jan;86-A(1):116-23 - PubMed
  52. Am J Sports Med. 1997 Jul-Aug;25(4):544-53 - PubMed
  53. J Med Chem. 2000 Mar 9;43(5):775-7 - PubMed
  54. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002 Jan;282(1):R323-9 - PubMed
  55. J Orthop Res. 2003 Jul;21(4):670-5 - PubMed
  56. Curr Med Res Opin. 2002;18(8):503-11 - PubMed
  57. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(6):545-56 - PubMed
  58. J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Mar;20(3):438-46 - PubMed
  59. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jun 17;340(24):1888-99 - PubMed
  60. Nat New Biol. 1971 Jun 23;231(25):232-5 - PubMed
  61. Phys Sportsmed. 2003 Jan;31(1):35-52 - PubMed
  62. Science. 2004 Oct 15;306(5695):384-5 - PubMed
  63. Science. 2002 Apr 19;296(5567):539-41 - PubMed
  64. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Oct 23;160(19):2998-3003 - PubMed
  65. J Clin Invest. 2002 Jun;109(11):1405-15 - PubMed
  66. Can Fam Physician. 2002 Sep;48:1455-7, 1458-60 - PubMed
  67. J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Aug;43(8):807-15 - PubMed
  68. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci. 2002 Sep;21(5):235-8 - PubMed
  69. Scand J Rheumatol. 1981;10(1):38-42 - PubMed
  70. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 9;345(6):433-42 - PubMed
  71. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2002 Aug;31(8):445-51 - PubMed
  72. Am J Cardiol. 1991 Sep 3;68(7):11B-15B - PubMed
  73. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 23;343 (21):1520-8, 2 p following 1528 - PubMed
  74. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Feb 24;163(4):481-6 - PubMed
  75. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003 Dec;26(6):571-8 - PubMed
  76. Nat Med. 1999 Jun;5(6):698-701 - PubMed

Substances

MeSH terms

Publication Types