Display options
Share it on

Eur Radiol. 2004 Jan;14(1):21-30. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1981-x. Epub 2003 Oct 03.

Microbubble ultrasound contrast in the assessment of hepatic artery patency following liver transplantation: role in reducing frequency of hepatic artery arteriography.

European radiology

Paul S Sidhu, Ashley S Shaw, Stephen M Ellis, John B Karani, Suzanne M Ryan

Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, SE5 9RS, London, UK. [email protected]

PMID: 14530998 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-1981-x

Abstract

We prospectively evaluated the role of microbubble ultrasound contrast for detection of hepatic artery thrombosis following liver transplantation. The hepatic artery of adult liver transplant recipients with suspected thrombosis on surveillance Doppler ultrasound (US) were re-examined by a second observer. In patients with no hepatic spectral Doppler signal the microbubble contrast agent Levovist was used. The presence or absence of flow following microbubble contrast was evaluated against arteriography or repeated Doppler US findings. A total of 794 surveillance Doppler US examinations were performed in 231 patients. Hepatic artery flow was demonstrated in 759 of 794 (95.6%) examinations. Microbubble ultrasound contrast was administered in 31 patients (35 studies) with suspected hepatic artery thrombosis. Following microbubble US contrast the hepatic artery could not be demonstrated in 13 of 35 (37.1%) studies (12 patients). Eight patients had arteriography: there was hepatic artery thrombosis in 7 patients and 1 patient had a patent, highly attenuated artery. Detection of a patent hepatic artery increased from 759 of 794 (95.6%) to 781 of 794 (98.4%) with the addition of microbubble contrast. Upon independent reading of the data, the degree of operator confidence in the assessment of the hepatic artery patency prior to microbubble contrast was 4.7 (CI 1.92-7.5) but rose to 8.45 (CI 7.06-9.84) following microbubble contrast ( p<0.0001). In 22 of 35 (62.9%) of studies arteriography could potentially have been avoided. Ultrasound microbubble contrast media may reduce the need for invasive arteriography in the assessment of suspected hepatic artery thrombosis.

References

  1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Oct;147(4):657-63 - PubMed
  2. J Pediatr Surg. 1999 May;34(5):845-9; discussion 849-50 - PubMed
  3. Rofo. 1997 May;166(5):411-6 - PubMed
  4. Radiol Med. 1994 May;87(5 Suppl 1):15-23 - PubMed
  5. Acta Radiol. 1994 Jan;35(1):1-5 - PubMed
  6. Clin Radiol. 1993 Mar;47(3):180-2 - PubMed
  7. Radiology. 1998 May;207 (2):339-47 - PubMed
  8. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988 Sep;151(3):481-3 - PubMed
  9. Radiology. 2001 Jun;219(3):823-7 - PubMed
  10. Eur Radiol. 2000;10 (7):1114-26 - PubMed
  11. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Jan;146(1):137-41 - PubMed
  12. Transplant Proc. 1991 Feb;23(1 Pt 2):1484-6 - PubMed
  13. Clin Radiol. 1992 Jul;46(1):38-42 - PubMed
  14. Ultraschall Med. 1998 Aug;19(4):148-56 - PubMed
  15. Radiology. 1996 Feb;198(2):553-9 - PubMed
  16. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 Nov;159(5):943-50 - PubMed
  17. Clin Radiol. 2002 Sep;57(9):789-99 - PubMed
  18. Clin Radiol. 2000 Jul;55(7):517-24 - PubMed
  19. Radiology. 1994 Sep;192(3):657-61 - PubMed
  20. Radiology. 1994 Oct;193(1):195-201 - PubMed
  21. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1994;20(4):319-33 - PubMed
  22. Ann Surg. 2000 Oct;232(4):490-500 - PubMed
  23. Radiology. 1998 Apr;207 (1):153-60 - PubMed
  24. Radiology. 1992 Dec;185(3):623-9 - PubMed
  25. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Dec;175(6):1735-9 - PubMed
  26. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Sep;163(3):585-9 - PubMed
  27. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1993 Sep;22(5):762-7 - PubMed
  28. Invest Radiol. 1995 Aug;30(8):451-7 - PubMed
  29. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Sep;149(3):485-9 - PubMed
  30. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 Dec;159(6):1199-201 - PubMed
  31. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Sep;155(3):517-25 - PubMed
  32. J Hepatol. 1995 Jun;22(6):623-32 - PubMed
  33. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Mar;154(3):573-5 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types