Display options
Share it on

CMAJ. 1992 Dec 01;147(11):1671-8.

Use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: physicians' attitudes and practice.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne

I G Stiell, I McDowell, R C Nair, H Aeta, G Greenberg, R D McKnight, J Ahuja

Affiliations

  1. Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ont.

PMID: 1362372 PMCID: PMC1336591
Free PMC Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficiency of the current use of radiography in patients with acute ankle injury. To study the judgements and attitudes of experienced clinicians in their use of ankle radiography and to thereby assess the potential for improved efficiency.

DESIGN: Two-stage study: retrospective chart review and prospective survey.

SETTING: Emergency departments of two adult teaching hospitals and one community hospital.

PARTICIPANTS: The records of 1831 adults presenting with acute blunt trauma to the ankle over 5 months were examined; another 732 patients were seen by 21 full-time emergency staff physicians over a subsequent 6-month period.

MEASURES AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 1831 patients with an ankle injury in stage 1, 94.9% had had at least one radiographic series; the yield for clinically important fractures was 12.8%. In stage 2, experienced physicians predicted the probability of fracture to be 0% or 10% in 57.8% of cases. The kappa (kappa) level for interobserver agreement in 98 patients seen independently by two physicians was 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39 to 0.72). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for physicians' predicted probability was 0.88 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.92), reflecting good discrimination between fracture and nonfracture cases. Likelihood ratios for predicted probabilities ranged from 0.08 for the 0% level to 151 for the 100% level. The physicians indicated that they would feel comfortable or very comfortable in not ordering radiography in 45.9% of cases (kappa level 0.52; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS: Emergency physicians order radiography for most patients with ankle injury even though they can accurately discriminate between fracture and nonfracture cases and clearly expect most of the radiographs to give normal results. These findings suggest great potential for a more efficient use of radiography in patients with ankle injury, possibly through the use of guidelines.

Similar articles

Show all 8 similar articles

Cited by

References

  1. N Engl J Med. 1979 Dec 27;301(26):1413-9 - PubMed
  2. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981 Jan;29(1):111-23 - PubMed
  3. Lancet. 1988 Jan 30;1(8579):244-5 - PubMed
  4. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Sep 6;293(6547):603-5 - PubMed
  5. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Apr 11;294(6577):943-7 - PubMed
  6. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1985 Aug;3(3):437-46 - PubMed
  7. Arch Intern Med. 1985 Jul;145(7):1257-9 - PubMed
  8. N Engl J Med. 1971 Feb 4;284(5):236-9 - PubMed
  9. Injury. 1983 May;14(6):507-12 - PubMed
  10. N Engl J Med. 1982 Feb 11;306(6):333-9 - PubMed
  11. N Engl J Med. 1979 May 24;300(21):1213-6 - PubMed
  12. Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Apr;21(4):384-90 - PubMed
  13. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 May;19(5):497-502 - PubMed
  14. Arch Emerg Med. 1986 Jun;3(2):101-6 - PubMed
  15. CMAJ. 1986 Nov 1;135(9):973-4 - PubMed
  16. Med Decis Making. 1988 Jan-Mar;8(1):40-7 - PubMed
  17. N Engl J Med. 1987 Jan 8;316(2):84-91 - PubMed
  18. JAMA. 1985 Sep 6;254(9):1203-7 - PubMed
  19. Injury. 1985 Sep;16(8):545-6 - PubMed
  20. Injury. 1974 Feb;5(3):213-4 - PubMed
  21. Can Med Assoc J. 1983 Jul 15;129(2):129-31 - PubMed
  22. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Feb 21;282(6264):607-8 - PubMed
  23. Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36 - PubMed
  24. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

LinkOut - more resources