Display options
Share it on
Full text links
Wiley Free PMC Article

Protein Sci. 1992 May;1(5):582-9. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560010504.

Specificity determinants of acylaminoacyl-peptide hydrolase.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society

R G Krishna, F Wold

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Medical School, Houston 77225.

PMID: 1304357 PMCID: PMC2142236 DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560010504
Free PMC Article

Abstract

In an attempt to explore how specific features of the substrate's primary structure may affect the activity of rabbit muscle acylaminoacyl-peptide hydrolase (EC 3.4.19.1), a number of acetylated peptides containing specific amino acid replacements in specific positions were prepared and compared as substrates for the hydrolase. The principal variants were D-Ala, Pro, and positive charges (His, Arg, Lys); in addition, the effect of the length of the peptide was also investigated in a less systematic manner. The substrates were either prepared by direct acetylation of peptides, by extension of the N-terminus with acetylamino acids or acetylpeptides, activated as N-hydroxysuccinimide esters, or by isolation of the N-terminal peptides from naturally occurring acetylated proteins. It was found that D-Ala on either side of the bond to be cleaved (positions 1 and 2) completely inhibited the enzymatic activity, whereas acetylated peptides with D-Ala in positions 3 or 4 were as good substrates as those containing L-Ala. Peptides with Pro in positions 2 were also inactive, and most of the peptides with Pro in the third position were very poor substrates; only the peptide Ac-AAP gave reasonably high activity (30% of Ac-AAA), which was reduced to 1-2% if additional residues were present at the C-terminus (Ac-AAPA, Ac-AAPAA). The presence of a positive charge in positions 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 gave strong reduction in hydrolase activity varying with the charge's distance from the N-terminus from 0 to 15-20% of the rates obtained with the reference peptides without positive charges.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

References

  1. J Biochem. 1975 Jan 1;77(1?):89-102 - PubMed
  2. Eur J Biochem. 1985 Nov 4;152(3):523-7 - PubMed
  3. Biochemistry. 1991 Jan 29;30(4):1017-21 - PubMed
  4. Biochemistry. 1991 Jan 29;30(4):1010-6 - PubMed
  5. J Biol Chem. 1990 Mar 5;265(7):3603-6 - PubMed
  6. Science. 1989 Jun 23;244(4911):1480-3 - PubMed
  7. J Biochem. 1989 Oct;106(4):548-51 - PubMed
  8. J Biol Chem. 1989 Jul 5;264(19):11076-81 - PubMed
  9. FASEB J. 1987 Nov;1(5):349-57 - PubMed
  10. Science. 1986 Oct 10;234(4773):179-86 - PubMed
  11. J Biol Chem. 1987 Aug 25;262(24):11435-45 - PubMed
  12. J Biol Chem. 1985 Mar 25;260(6):3784-90 - PubMed
  13. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1985 Jan 31;126(2):933-40 - PubMed
  14. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680-5 - PubMed
  15. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54 - PubMed
  16. Anal Biochem. 1991 Nov 15;199(1):45-50 - PubMed
  17. Science. 1991 Jul 12;253(5016):164-70 - PubMed
  18. Eur J Biochem. 1991 Mar 28;196(3):679-85 - PubMed
  19. Trends Biochem Sci. 1989 Jul;14(7):276-9 - PubMed
  20. J Biol Chem. 1989 May 25;264(15):8892-9 - PubMed
  21. J Biol Chem. 1988 Oct 15;263(29):14948-55 - PubMed
  22. Biochemistry. 1988 Oct 18;27(21):7979-84 - PubMed
  23. Biochemistry. 1987 Dec 15;26(25):8242-6 - PubMed
  24. Trends Biotechnol. 1990 Oct;8(10):282-8 - PubMed

Substances

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support

LinkOut - more resources