Display options
Share it on

Wien Med Wochenschr. 2003;153(9):202-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1563-258x.2003.02112.x.

Cost-effectiveness in diagnosis of patients with long-standing fever.

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)

Harald Wolf, Wolfgang Graninger

Affiliations

  1. Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Medicine A, Department of Anaesthesiology and General Intensive Medicine, University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. [email protected]

PMID: 12836456 DOI: 10.1046/j.1563-258x.2003.02112.x

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It is difficult to make an adequate diagnosis regarding patients with fever of unknown origin (FUO). The cases require time-consuming and costly investigations. Our study features a cost-effectiveness analysis and the development of an alternative diagnostic model. The diagnostic programmes include: serological and microbiological tests, blood laboratory test, radiological, histopathological and radionuclide tests.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: For 100 hospitalized patients with fever (group A: > 38.0 degrees C for as long as 7 days; group B: > 38.3 degrees C for 3 weeks), the various results of clinical investigations were obtained, and the costs of a three-step programme for the four main diagnoses, including the diagnostic value, were evaluated.

RESULTS: There was no significant difference between male and female patients, or patients < 35 vs. > 35, and < 50 vs. > 50 years. Infections were found in 46%, neoplasma and collagen-vascular disease/autoimmune disorders in 10% each, and other diseases in 20% of all patients. The third diagnostic programme was the most expensive in all four disease categories. In total, 30, 34, and 22 patients were diagnosed by the three diagnostic steps, respectively. In 14 patients no diagnosis was found. The overall cost of the three diagnostic programmes was 359, 1,996 and 3,496 EUR, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of the cases (64%), the first and second diagnostic programmes result in a diagnosis. The investigations of the third diagnostic programme are more accurate, more expensive, and result in a diagnosis, mainly in patients of group B. Our proposed new diagnostic model would save 134, 746, and 558 EUR for each diagnostic step, respectively.

References

  1. Acta Clin Belg. 1992;47(2):100-16 - PubMed
  2. Med Klin (Munich). 1998 Oct 15;93(10):598-611 - PubMed
  3. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1978 Nov;26(11):498-505 - PubMed
  4. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1982 Jul 2;107(26):1003-7 - PubMed
  5. Medicine (Baltimore). 1961 Feb;40:1-30 - PubMed
  6. Chest. 2000 Mar;117(3):855-69 - PubMed
  7. Med Clin North Am. 1988 Sep;72(5):1247-61 - PubMed
  8. Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Mar;24(3):291-300; quiz 301-2 - PubMed
  9. Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Sep;25(3):551-73 - PubMed
  10. Medicine (Baltimore). 1982 Sep;61(5):269-92 - PubMed
  11. Am J Med Sci. 1977 Jul-Aug;274(1):21-5 - PubMed
  12. Med Decis Making. 1996 Oct-Dec;16(4):357-66 - PubMed
  13. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Nov;41(11):1187-92 - PubMed
  14. Clin Infect Dis. 1998 May;26(5):1042-59 - PubMed
  15. Medicine (Baltimore). 1993 May;72(3):184-96 - PubMed
  16. Arch Intern Med. 1992 Jan;152(1):51-5 - PubMed
  17. N Engl J Med. 1974 Apr 4;290(14):807 - PubMed
  18. Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Dec;15(6):968-73 - PubMed
  19. Curr Clin Top Infect Dis. 1991;11:35-51 - PubMed
  20. J Pediatr. 1991 Jan;118(1):21-9 - PubMed
  21. J Chemother. 1999 Feb;11(1):54-60 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types