Display options
Share it on

Drugs. 2003;63(8):769-802. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363080-00004.

Lopinavir/ritonavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection.

Drugs

Risto S Cvetkovic, Karen L Goa

Affiliations

  1. Adis International Limited, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, New Zealand. [email protected]

PMID: 12662125 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200363080-00004

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Lopinavir is a novel protease inhibitor (PI) developed from ritonavir. Coadministration with low-dose ritonavir significantly improves the pharmacokinetic properties and hence the activity of lopinavir against HIV-1 protease. Coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir was developed for ease of administration and to ensure both drugs are taken together, as part of combination therapy with other antiretroviral agents. Coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimens provide adequate and durable suppression of viral load and sustained improvements in CD4+ cell counts, as demonstrated in randomised trials in antiretroviral therapy-naive and -experienced adults and children. To date, development of primary resistance to lopinavir/ritonavir has not been observed in 470 antiretroviral therapy-naive patients treated for >48 weeks. The lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen was more effective than nelfinavir in antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV-1-infected patients in a phase III trial. The coformulation is also effective as 'salvage' therapy, as shown by low cross-resistance rates in patients who failed to respond to treatment with other PIs in phase II trials. Coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir was well tolerated in both antiretroviral therapy-naive and -experienced HIV-1-infected adults and children with low rates of study drug-related treatment discontinuations. The most common adverse event in adults associated with lopinavir/ritonavir was diarrhoea, followed by other gastrointestinal disturbances, asthenia, headache and skin rash. The incidence of moderate-to-severe adverse events in children was low, skin rash being the most common. Changes in body fat composition occurred with equal frequency in lopinavir/ritonavir- and nelfinavir-treated naive patients, through week 60 in a phase III study. Although laboratory abnormalities occurred with similar frequency in both treatment groups, triglycerides grade 3/4 elevations were significantly more frequent with lopinavir/ritonavir. Total cholesterol and triglycerides grade 3/4 elevations appear to occur more frequently in PI-experienced than in PI-naive lopinavir/ritonavir-treated patients. A number of clinically important drug interactions have been reported with lopinavir/ritonavir necessitating dosage adjustments of lopinavir/ritonavir and/or the interacting drugs, and several other drugs are contraindicated in patients receiving the coformulation.

CONCLUSION: Coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir is a novel PI that, in combination with other antiretroviral agents, suppresses plasma viral load and enhances immunological status in therapy-naive and -experienced patients with HIV-1 infection. Lopinavir/ritonavir appears more effective than nelfinavir in 'naive' patients and is also suitable for 'salvage' therapy, because of its high barrier to development of resistance. Given its clinical efficacy, a tolerability profile in keeping with this class of drugs, favourable resistance profile and easy-to-adhere-to administration regimen, coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir should be regarded as a first-line option when including a PI in the management of HIV-1 infection.

OVERVIEW OF PHARMACODYNAMIC PROPERTIES: Lopinavir/ritonavir is a coformulation of two structurally related protease inhibitor (PI) antiretroviral agents. Lopinavir is a highly potent and selective inhibitor of the HIV type 1 (HIV-1) protease, an essential enzyme for production of mature, infective virus. It acts by arresting maturation of HIV-1 thereby blocking its infectivity. Thus, the main antiviral action of lopinavir is to prevent subsequent infections of susceptible cells; it has no effect on cells with already integrated viral DNA. Lopinavir has an approximate, equals 10-fold higher in vitro activity against both wild-type and mutant HIV-1 proteases than ritonavir; however, its in vivo activity is greatly attenuated by a high first-pass hepatic metabolism. The low-dose ritonavir coadministered with lopinavir inhibits metabolic inactivation of lopinavir and acts only as its pharmacokinetic enhancer. Therefore, the antiretroviral activity of roviral activity of coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100mg twice daily is derived solely from lopinavir plasma concentrations. Combining lopinavir with low-dose ritonavir produces lopinavir concentrations far exceeding those needed to suppress 50% of in vitro and in vivo viral replication in CD4+ cells and monocyte/macrophages (main human reservoirs of HIV-1 infection). Thus far, no resistance to lopinavir has been detected in clinical trials in antiretroviral therapy-naive patients treated for up to 204 weeks and only 12% of HIV-1 strains from patients in whom prior treatment with multiple PIs have failed, have been observed to develop resistance to coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir. A strong negative correlation was found between the number of PI mutations at baseline and the viral response rates achieved with lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimens in PI-experienced patients, indicating that resistance to lopinavir increases with increasing number of PI mutations and that five PI mutations represent the clinically relevant genotypic breakpoint for lopinavir.

OVERVIEW OF PHARMACOKINETIC PROPERTIES: The absolute bioavailability of lopinavir coformulated with ritonavir in humans has not yet been established. Multiple-dosage absorption pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100mg twice daily (the mean peak [C(max)] and trough [C(trough)] plasma concentrations at steady-state and the 12-hour area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC(12)] of either drug) were stable in antiretroviral therapy-naive and single PI-experienced adult patients receiving therapy over a 24-week evaluation period. The C(trough) values of lopinavir, achieved with lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100mg twice daily, were median 84-fold higher than the protein binding-adjusted 50% effective concentration (EC(50)) of lopinavir against wild-type HIV-1 in antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV-1-infected patients in a phase II study. Bioavailability of lopinavir administered in either the capsule or the liquid lopinavir/ritonavir formulation can be increased substantially with concurrent ingestion of food with moderate-to-high fat content. At steady state, lopinavir is approximately 98-99% plasma protein bound and the percentage of its unbound (i.e. pharmacologically active) fraction is dependent on total drug plasma concentration. Both lopinavir and ritonavir penetrate poorly into the human genital tracts and the cerebrospinal fluid. Both agents undergo extensive and rapid first-pass metabolism by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 isoenzyme. However, ritonavir also potently inhibits this enzyme and acts as a pharmacokinetic enhancer of lopinavir. The elimination half-life and apparent oral clearance of lopinavir average approximately 4-6 hours and approximately 6-7 L/h, respectively, with lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100mg twice daily administration. Less than 3% and 20% of the lopinavir dose is excreted unchanged in the urine and faeces, respectively. Limited data show similar pharmacokinetics of lopinavir in children as in adults.

DRUG INTERACTIONS: Coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir has the potential to interact with wide variety of drugs via several mechanisms, mostly involving the CYP enzymes. Coadministration of lopinavir/ritonavir is contraindicated with certain drugs (i.e. flecainide, propafenone, astemizole, terfenadine, ergot derivatives, cisapride, pimozide, midazolam and triazolam) that are highly dependent on CYP3A or CYP2D6 for clearance and for which elevated plasma concentrations are associated with serious and/or life-threatening events. Coadministration with lopinavir/ritonavir is also not recommended for drugs or herbal products (i.e. rifampicin [rifampin] and St. John's wort [Hypericum perforatum]) that may substantially reduce lopinavir plasma concentrations, or drugs whose plasma concentrations elevated by the coformulation may lead to serious adverse reactions (i.e. simvastatin and lovastatin). However, a recent study in healthy volunteers suggests that adequate lopinavir concentrations may be achieved during rifampicin coadministration by increasing the twice-daily dosage of lopinavir/ritonavir in conjunction with therapeutic drug monitoring. The liquid (but not the capsule) formulation of lopinavir/ritonavir contains 42.4% ethanol (v/v) and should not be coadministered with drugs capable of producing disulfiram-like reactions (e.g. disulfiram, metronidazole). Coadministration with saquinavir or indinavir requires no dosage adjustment, whereas coadministration with amprenavir, nevirapine or efavirenz requires a dosage increase of the coformulation typically by 33%. As the oral bioavailability of both didanosine and lopinavir/ritonavir is significantly affected by concurrent food ingestion, didanosine should be administered 1 hour before or 2 hours after lopinavir/ritonavir has been taken with food. Interactions between lopinavir/ritonavir and other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are not expected. The coformulation is also likely to increase plasma concentrations of non-antiretroviral drugs metabolised through the CYP3A pathway. To reduce the risk of their toxicity when coadministered with lopinavir/ritonavir, the recommended actions include: (i) monitoring of the drug plasma concentration (antiarrhythmics and immunosuppressants) or the international normalised ratio (warfarin); (ii) the use of alternative treatment (atorvastatin) or birth control methods (ethinylestradiol); and (iii) dosage adjustment (clarithromycin [only in patients with renal failure], rifabutin, dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers, atorvastatin, ketoconazole and itraconazole). (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

References

  1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Mar;41(3):654-60 - PubMed
  2. J Infect Dis. 2000 May;181(5):1622-8 - PubMed
  3. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Apr 15;34(8):1143-5 - PubMed
  4. AIDS. 1998 May 7;12(7):F51-8 - PubMed
  5. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Aug;43(8):1817-26 - PubMed
  6. AIDS. 2000 Jun 16;14(9):1187-94 - PubMed
  7. AIDS. 1998 Oct 22;12(15):F181-9 - PubMed
  8. BMJ. 2001 May 19;322(7296):1226-9 - PubMed
  9. AIDS. 2000 Jan 28;14(2):117-21 - PubMed
  10. J Infect Dis. 1999 Dec;180(6):2039-43 - PubMed
  11. Science. 1990 Apr 20;248(4953):358-61 - PubMed
  12. AIDS. 2000 Sep 8;14(13):1979-84 - PubMed
  13. N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 15;344(11):824-31 - PubMed
  14. AIDS. 1999 Dec 24;13(18):2493-505 - PubMed
  15. AIDS. 1998 Oct 22;12(15):F167-73 - PubMed
  16. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Jan;47(1):238-43 - PubMed
  17. Am Fam Physician. 1998 Jan 1;57(1):107-16 - PubMed
  18. N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 15;334(7):426-31 - PubMed
  19. AIDS. 1999 Oct 1;13(14):F95-9 - PubMed
  20. J Infect Dis. 2002 Mar 1;185(5):599-607 - PubMed
  21. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002 Jul 18;1587(2-3):258-75 - PubMed
  22. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996 Apr;277(1):423-31 - PubMed
  23. AIDS. 1999 May 28;13(8):957-62 - PubMed
  24. Drug Metab Dispos. 1999 Aug;27(8):902-8 - PubMed
  25. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 27;346(26):2039-46 - PubMed
  26. Pharmacotherapy. 1999 Apr;19(4):471-2 - PubMed
  27. Antivir Ther. 2002 Sep;7(3):165-74 - PubMed
  28. Br J Dermatol. 2000 Mar;142(3):496-500 - PubMed
  29. Virology. 1990 Nov;179(1):508-11 - PubMed
  30. HIV Med. 2001 Apr;2(2):105-13 - PubMed
  31. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Oct;18(4):393-404 - PubMed
  32. Science. 1996 May 24;272(5265):1167-70 - PubMed
  33. AIDS. 1994 Aug;8(8):F1-5 - PubMed
  34. Lancet. 1999 Jun 19;353(9170):2093-9 - PubMed
  35. AIDS. 2001 Jul 27;15(11):1369-77 - PubMed
  36. BMJ. 2002 Mar 30;324(7340):757 - PubMed
  37. JAMA. 1988 May 27;259(20):3023-6 - PubMed
  38. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1992 Feb;8(2):153-64 - PubMed
  39. Virology. 1998 Oct 25;250(2):255-62 - PubMed
  40. HIV Clin Trials. 2002 Jul-Aug;3(4):304-9 - PubMed
  41. J Virol. 2001 Aug;75(16):7462-9 - PubMed
  42. Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(7):709-13 - PubMed
  43. AIDS. 1999 Jun 18;13(9):1035-44 - PubMed
  44. J Virol. 1992 Apr;66(4):1856-65 - PubMed
  45. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Aug 15;35(4):488-90 - PubMed
  46. N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 7;333(23):1534-9 - PubMed
  47. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Dec;42(12):3218-24 - PubMed
  48. Drugs. 2000 Dec;60(6):1371-9; discussion 1380-1 - PubMed
  49. AIDS. 1998 Oct 22;12(15):1991-7 - PubMed
  50. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Mar;32(3):194-209 - PubMed
  51. AIDS. 1999 May 7;13(7):859-60 - PubMed
  52. AIDS. 1999 Sep 10;13(13):1796-7 - PubMed
  53. AIDS. 2001 Jan 5;15(1):F1-9 - PubMed
  54. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Oct 15;33(8):e91-2 - PubMed
  55. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jun 15;126(12):946-54 - PubMed
  56. Antivir Ther. 2001 Dec;6(4):201-29 - PubMed
  57. Drug Saf. 1999 Apr;20(4):299-321 - PubMed
  58. Drug Metab Dispos. 1999 Jan;27(1):86-91 - PubMed
  59. AIDS Read. 2001 Feb;11(2):87-98; quiz 107-8 - PubMed
  60. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jul;85(13):4686-90 - PubMed
  61. AIDS. 2001 Mar 30;15(5):662-4 - PubMed
  62. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993 Feb;24(2):101-23 - PubMed
  63. AIDS. 1999 Oct 1;13(14):1873-80 - PubMed
  64. JAMA. 1998 Jul 1;280(1):67-71 - PubMed
  65. AIDS. 2002 Aug 16;16(12):1698-700 - PubMed
  66. Infection. 1999 Mar-Apr;27(2):77-81 - PubMed
  67. AIDS. 2001 Oct 19;15(15):2051-3 - PubMed
  68. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Jun;30 Suppl 2:S135-42 - PubMed
  69. J Infect Dis. 2001 May 1;183(9):1318-27 - PubMed

Substances

MeSH terms

Publication Types